United Kingdom Teams 2022 – GC Powerlist
GC Powerlist Logo

United Kingdom Teams 2022

Supported by the Association of Corporate Counsel

ACC Alliance Logo
  • Industries

  • Powerlist

Financials

View profile
Information technology

View profile
Materials and mining

View profile
Consumer products

View profile
Consumer products

View profile
Transport and infrastructure

View profile
BT

|

Telecommunication services

View profile
Healthcare

View profile
GC Powerlist logo as placeholder
Financials

View profile
Commercial and professional services

View profile
Information technology

View profile
Transport and infrastructure

View profile
Consumer products

View profile
Energy and utilities

View profile
Transport and infrastructure

View profile
Transport and infrastructure

View profile
Information technology

View profile
Non-profit / public sector

View profile
GSK

|

Healthcare

View profile
Healthcare

View profile
Consumer products

View profile
Transport and infrastructure

View profile
Materials and mining

View profile
Consumer products

View profile
GC Powerlist logo as placeholder
Consumer products

View profile
Consumer products

View profile
Information technology

View profile
Information technology

View profile
Energy and utilities

View profile
Sports and media

View profile
Transport and infrastructure

View profile
Transport and infrastructure

View profile
Information technology

View profile
SSE

|

Energy and utilities

View profile
Industrials and real estate

View profile
Information technology

View profile
UBS

|

Financials

View profile
Information technology

View profile
Transport and infrastructure

View profile
Telecommunication services

View profile
Financials

View profile
GC Powerlist logo as placeholder
Information technology

GC Powerlist logo as placeholder
AIG

|

Financials

GC Powerlist logo as placeholder
Consumer products

GC Powerlist logo as placeholder
Financials

GC Powerlist logo as placeholder
Aon

|

Financials

GC Powerlist logo as placeholder
Financials

GC Powerlist logo as placeholder
Industrials and real estate

GC Powerlist logo as placeholder
Financials

GC Powerlist logo as placeholder
Financials

GC Powerlist logo as placeholder
BBC

|

Sports and media

GC Powerlist logo as placeholder
Industrials and real estate

GC Powerlist logo as placeholder
Commercial and professional services

GC Powerlist logo as placeholder
Financials

GC Powerlist logo as placeholder
Sports and media

GC Powerlist logo as placeholder
Food

GC Powerlist logo as placeholder
EDF

|

Energy and utilities

GC Powerlist logo as placeholder
Consumer products

GC Powerlist logo as placeholder
Financials

GC Powerlist logo as placeholder
Sports and media

GC Powerlist logo as placeholder
Financials

GC Powerlist logo as placeholder
Consumer products

GC Powerlist logo as placeholder
Industrials and real estate

GC Powerlist logo as placeholder
Financials

GC Powerlist logo as placeholder
Consumer products

GC Powerlist logo as placeholder
Information technology

GC Powerlist logo as placeholder
Financials

GC Powerlist logo as placeholder
Transport and infrastructure

GC Powerlist logo as placeholder
Financials

GC Powerlist logo as placeholder
PwC

|

Commercial and professional services

GC Powerlist logo as placeholder
Consumer products

GC Powerlist logo as placeholder
Materials and mining

GC Powerlist logo as placeholder
Commercial and professional services

GC Powerlist logo as placeholder
Industrials and real estate

GC Powerlist logo as placeholder
Sky

|

Sports and media

GC Powerlist logo as placeholder
Consumer products

GC Powerlist logo as placeholder
Consumer products

GC Powerlist logo as placeholder
Telecommunication services

GC Powerlist logo as placeholder
Financials

GC Powerlist logo as placeholder
WPP

|

Sports and media

Heading up the GC Powerlist team at The Legal 500 for the past year has been a pleasure and a privilege, and, as it is the jewel-in-the-crown and home edition of our esteemed publication, it is my extreme honour to be able to introduce this latest instalment of the UK Powerlist, the GC Powerlist: UK Teams 2022.

For this year’s teams-focused Powerlist, we ran with the theme ‘in-house teams in ascendance’. We chose this to reflect the increased prominence that in-house teams have achieved following the challenging and potentially adverse business environment that UK in-house lawyers have had to navigate over the past two-and-a-half years, which unfortunately looks set to continue. A lot has changed since our team decided on the topic earlier this year (a slightly more optimistic period for the British business world before having to absorb increasingly gloomy predictions about the UK’s economic future). Still, the attributes that a top-quality in-house legal team needs to truly support their business remain the same.

Attributes that the teams within this list have in spades. As well as strategic thinking, a keen but practical sense for risk management, excellent internal team dynamics, a thorough understanding of their company’s operations and a business mindset, the teams within the GC Powerlist: United Kingdom Teams 2022 display profound technical legal skill regularly on the full range of business dilemmas that confront the companies within these pages.

While interviewing for the Powerlist, we took the opportunity to ask some extra questions to some of the in-house lawyers we spoke to, as part of a small survey. It had some interesting results. Of the macroeconomic headaches keeping UK in-house lawyers awake at night, galloping inflation ranked as the number one concern for in-house lawyers in Britain. That this ranked first among such issues as Covid and the Ukraine crisis is quite instructive as to how seriously the business world takes the current position the UK finds itself in. As to how this might affect the way the legal world works going forward, this quote from our interview with Imraan Patel, group general counsel and company secretary of EG Group, may be instructive: ‘The business itself will be more efficient… as cost inflation drives external adviser fee expectations, being able to better anticipate corporate needs and to more effectively resource will be crucial’.

This brings us to our next takeaway from the survey. When asked how their external counsel could help them get through what is likely to be a less-than-optimal short term ahead for many companies, far and away the most popular response was flexibility on billing arrangements. As Tom Parachini, global head of legal and regulatory, explained during his interview, ‘we do not often see law firms focusing on the efficiency of their legal work or delivery of services. It would also be great to see law firms adopting more technology solutions, even simple ones, to drive that efficiency’. For other insights from the great and the good of the British in-house legal scene, read on to the interviews which follow this introduction.

A huge thanks from The Legal 500’s GC in-house legal research team to everyone who helped us put this project together, and a massive congratulations to all the legal teams who made the final cut.

In-house legal research team

LexisNexis AI Forum 2026

The recent news that elite US firm Sullivan & Cromwell had apologised to a judge over AI hallucinations in a court filing prompted a collective wince from the legal profession.

But while some lawyers remain wary of AI, others are striking a more open-minded note, and at the LexisNexis AI Forum hosted this Wednesday (20 May) by Legal 500 and Legal Business, panelists argued that the risks are far outweighed by the opportunities.

Barbara Zapisetskaya, principal technology counsel at the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, made the case that hallucinations and other potential pitfalls can be overcome with a shift in mindset.

‘What makes a difference,’ she said, ‘is empowering your lawyers to take responsibility for AI output – helping them become active AI operators, not just passive AI users. You have agency to decide whether you agree with the output or not.’

Zapisetskaya was among a line-up of leading in-house figures speaking on two panels, which covered everything from practical steps for AI implementation to the key decisions GCs need to be making in the coming months.

Financial Times general counsel Dan Guilford began by stressing the importance of building the right culture for AI adoption. In addition to proactively upskilling himself, Guilford talked about how he had implemented a voluntary weekly ‘show and tell’ meeting for team members to share successful use cases – or an exercise that became a gratifying measure of progress.

Other panelists discussed how increased in-house productivity is altering the dynamic with their external counsel.

While some see the use of AI by law firms as a precursor for reduced fees, Russell Davies, head of global operations for legal and compliance at Dentsu, said that faster results – however they are delivered – are something to be valued.

GSK assistant general counsel Anthony Kenny agreed, saying that while there was an expectation that external counsel would be utilising AI, the focus should be on the value of the output, rather than an overemphasis on identifying AI use as a justification to reduce fees.

Speaking on the second panel, MUFG EMEA general counsel James Morgan stressed the critical importance of education, noting that educating the C-suite on the advantages and risks of AI is just as important as enabling large in-house teams to use these tools.

Shanthini Satyendra, vice-chair of the AI Committee, Society for Computers & Law, CEO and founder of Manisain, offered a reminder of the importance of making the connection between tasks and the purpose behind them, extolling the virtues of identifying use cases for AI that can solve a meaningful problem.

Zapisetskaya concurred, adding that one of the most important tasks for GCs across the next six to twelve months is to create AI playbooks and templates, noting that ‘it is easy for lawyers to see problems – much harder for lawyers to see opportunities.’

There was also broad agreement among panellists that GCs should focus on upskilling their junior lawyers on AI, rather than – as some may expect – cutting back their workforce. As Satyendra summarised: ‘Some people are replacing human capital with AI without thinking about what’s required to make AI work. Retain your people and train them up.’

The panels were moderated by Emma Millington, head of the UK Lexis+ Finance Group, and LexisNexis director of segment management Stuart Greenhill.