Germany 2026
Supported by the Association of Corporate Counsel
Head of legal and deputy director of legal and compliance | Condor Flugdienst
Rising Star
Vice president legal innovation and head of legal services global purchasing and logistics | Robert Bosch
Head of legal and compliance officer | Danone Deutschland
Senior associate vice president and principal legal counsel | Deutsche Börse
Rising Star
Group general counsel and chief compliance officer | SEFE Securing Energy for Europe
Group general counsel and senior vice president legal and audit | HARIBO Holding
Vice president legal, ethics, compliance and quality | Novo Nordisk
Head of legal - corporate, DigITal and sustainability | Merck Group
Rising Star
Group general counsel and member of the group management committee | Deutsche Bank
Team lead of technics and product law | Jungheinrich
Rising Star
Group investment counsel and interim head of legal Germany | P3 Logistic Parks
Regional general counsel Middle and Eastern Europe | SAP Deutschland
Director of legal and compliance | Condor Flugdienst
Assistant general counsel and director | Aramark Deutschland
Rising Star
In-house counsel and director of corporate services | CGI
Rising Star
General counsel and vice president legal and compliance | GKN Automotive
Head of legal corporate and investment banking Germany, Austria, Switzerland and Nordic countries | Banco Santander
Group head of contract and data protection law | Amadeus Fire Gruppe
Group vice president legal, audit and data protection | Amadeus Fire Gruppe
General counsel and head of global HR and legal | Maxon Computer
Director of legal, human resources and corporate development | VfL BOCHUM 1848
General counsel and vice president legal and corporate compliance | Vetter Pharma-Fertigung
Head of the legal department | Stadtwerke Verkehrsgesellschaft Frankfurt am Main
Rising Star
Head of legal, compliance and risk management | Lufthansa Industry Solutions
Rising Star
The German in-house legal market continues to move towards lean, tech-enabled and strategically embedded legal functions. The 2026 edition of the Legal 500 GC Powerlist: Germany puts the spotlight on the in-house leaders driving a legal counsel sector in which AI and human-centred leadership coexist under growing regulatory and geopolitical pressure.
Over the past year, Germany’s in-house legal market has been shaped by a technology-led transformation and rising regulatory complexity. These forces have pushed legal teams to evolve into the most strategic, efficient, and digitally enabled versions of themselves. Balancing compliance, business partnering, and operational excellence, as budgets tighten and the talent landscape grows increasingly competitive, has become the defining challenge for in-house legal leaders across the country.
Legal is no longer a support function within organisations, but a key strategic business partner. Legal teams across Germany are increasingly perceived as trusted advisors, navigators, and enablers of growth. Their early involvement in strategy, transformation, and crisis management positions GCs in the region not merely as lawyers sitting next to the business but, as Dr Ivo Frohmüller, Senior Associate VP and Principal Legal Counsel at Deutsche Börse, puts it, as “business leaders with a law degree.”
In conversations with in-house counsel worldwide, AI sits firmly at the top of the agenda, and Germany is no exception. With the integration of Copilot, Harvey, and other internal GenAI tools, the narrative has shifted from experimentation to pragmatic, tool-driven implementation. Several German GCs note that while AI is currently surrounded by hype, its real competitive impact will emerge only once it is fully embedded into legal workflows. As Dr Christian Folter, head of legal business at BASF SE, observes, “the trick is to recognize the turning point, and act accordingly.”
At the same time, rising regulatory density, alongside new trade restrictions, export controls, sanctions regimes, and the fragmentation of global legal frameworks, is transforming the legal function in the country. In-house teams are moving beyond the interpretation of law towards navigating contradiction, uncertainty, and speed in an increasingly complex operating environment.
Finally, German in-house counsel have matured their ESG thinking, understanding it as an element of operational culture rather than a standalone compliance exercise. As Dr Christine Fischer, director of legal counsel at Hapag-Lloyd AG, explains, “ESG requirements need to be translated into workable processes for the business, otherwise they risk becoming purely theoretical.”
Against this backdrop of rising expectations, regulatory intensity, and geopolitical pressure, the T-shaped leader, combining deep legal expertise with technological fluency, strategic thinking, and human-centred leadership, is becoming the norm across German legal teams.
We would like to thank and congratulate the 2026 cohort for their thoughtful insights and the candid conversations shared with our team throughout the research process. It has been a pleasure to learn from your perspectives and experiences.
Carmen Godoy Martin, Lead researcher: GC Powerlist Germany 2026
The recent news that elite US firm Sullivan & Cromwell had apologised to a judge over AI hallucinations in a court filing prompted a collective wince from the legal profession.
But while some lawyers remain wary of AI, others are striking a more open-minded note, and at the LexisNexis AI Forum hosted this Wednesday (20 May) by Legal 500 and Legal Business, panelists argued that the risks are far outweighed by the opportunities.
Barbara Zapisetskaya, principal technology counsel at the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, made the case that hallucinations and other potential pitfalls can be overcome with a shift in mindset.
‘What makes a difference,’ she said, ‘is empowering your lawyers to take responsibility for AI output – helping them become active AI operators, not just passive AI users. You have agency to decide whether you agree with the output or not.’
Zapisetskaya was among a line-up of leading in-house figures speaking on two panels, which covered everything from practical steps for AI implementation to the key decisions GCs need to be making in the coming months.
Financial Times general counsel Dan Guilford began by stressing the importance of building the right culture for AI adoption. In addition to proactively upskilling himself, Guilford talked about how he had implemented a voluntary weekly ‘show and tell’ meeting for team members to share successful use cases – or an exercise that became a gratifying measure of progress.
Other panelists discussed how increased in-house productivity is altering the dynamic with their external counsel.
While some see the use of AI by law firms as a precursor for reduced fees, Russell Davies, head of global operations for legal and compliance at Dentsu, said that faster results – however they are delivered – are something to be valued.
GSK assistant general counsel Anthony Kenny agreed, saying that while there was an expectation that external counsel would be utilising AI, the focus should be on the value of the output, rather than an overemphasis on identifying AI use as a justification to reduce fees.
Speaking on the second panel, MUFG EMEA general counsel James Morgan stressed the critical importance of education, noting that educating the C-suite on the advantages and risks of AI is just as important as enabling large in-house teams to use these tools.
Shanthini Satyendra, vice-chair of the AI Committee, Society for Computers & Law, CEO and founder of Manisain, offered a reminder of the importance of making the connection between tasks and the purpose behind them, extolling the virtues of identifying use cases for AI that can solve a meaningful problem.
Zapisetskaya concurred, adding that one of the most important tasks for GCs across the next six to twelve months is to create AI playbooks and templates, noting that ‘it is easy for lawyers to see problems – much harder for lawyers to see opportunities.’
There was also broad agreement among panellists that GCs should focus on upskilling their junior lawyers on AI, rather than – as some may expect – cutting back their workforce. As Satyendra summarised: ‘Some people are replacing human capital with AI without thinking about what’s required to make AI work. Retain your people and train them up.’
The panels were moderated by Emma Millington, head of the UK Lexis+ Finance Group, and LexisNexis director of segment management Stuart Greenhill.
