Senior legal counsel, head of global practice area | ANDRITZ AG
Head of Legal, Compliance & Risk Management Department Southeast Europe | Schenker & CO AG
Head of Legal Department | Wirtschaftskammer Wien
Head of group legal and compliance | TÜV AUSTRIA HOLDING AG
General counsel South East Europe | Siemens Energy Austria
Head of central legal services | Greiner AG
General counsel (Head of legal, compliance and insurance) | Kwizda Holding GmbH
Group general counsel & chief compliance officer | HOERBIGERÂ
General counsel/head of group legal | SPAR Österreichische Warenhandels-AG
Head of Legal & Compliance | Bundesrechenzentrum GmbH
Regional Compliance Officer Central/Eastern Europe/CIS | thyssenkrupp AG
Head of legal (Austria and Switzerland) | ALD Automotive Fuhrparkmanagement und Leasing GmbH
Head of legal and compliance | Liechtensteinische Landesbank (Österreich) AG
General counsel/Managing Director Zürich Service GmbH / ZSG (subsidiary of Zurich) | Zürich Versicherungs-Aktiengesellschaft
Regional general counsel & group compliance officer | ANDRITZ AG
Group compliance officer and general counsel | IMS Nanofabrication
Vienna Group Lead International Legal/PPP Department | STRABAG
General counsel | Niederösterreichische Verkehrs-organisationsges.m.b.H
Head of legal and compliance | Wiener Stadtwerke GmbH (Vienna Utilities Services Group)
Country legal director, ethics and compliance officer | Coca-Cola
Head of legal affairs Austria | ALSTOM Transport Austria
Head of legal and Corporate Affairs Director | Tobaccoland Handels GmbH & Co KG
It is my pleasure to announce another edition of Legal 500’s GC Powerlist: Austria. The 2025 edition of the Powerlist once again recognises some of the pre-eminent in-house counsel across the country.
I would like to congratulate all those featured in this year’s Powerlist and thank everyone who took part in the research process.
Throughout our conversations with general counsel from an array of companies across different sectors, several recurring themes emerged – ones that in-house counsel should keep in mind. As Dr. Michael Stelzel, group general counsel and chief compliance officer at HOERBIGER, points out, ‘extremely fast-moving sanctions regimes and geopolitical economic and political power games’ are forcing organisations to stay on top – and ahead – of various emerging trends. And in-house counsel are often at the forefront of these efforts.
Among the most frequently cited issues were AI and digitalisation. Philip Pauser, group general counsel at Alpega, cited AI as ‘a key trend, if not the key trend’. As AI continues to impact the way that companies operate, GCs are having to strike a balance between embracing new technology and maintaining the high standard expected of legal departments. Amanda Neil, general counsel at Head Group, notes: ‘law is an area which demands a high degree of accuracy and attention to detail, and some tools are not yet adequate to the task.’
However, as AI continues to be incorporated into organisations and the legal sector more widely, Dr. Roswitha Stöllner, general counsel at SPAR Österreichische Warenhandels-AG, reminds us that ‘the potential for efficiency and accuracy gains is significant and worth monitoring closely’.
Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) concerns are also a priority for many in-house counsel across Austria – despite ongoing global political shifts – as GCs play an integral part in the adoption of ESG initiatives. Mario Zlattinger, Head of Legal Austria and Switzerland at ALD Automotive Fuhrparkmanagement und Leasing, emphasises that the GC ‘plays a critical leadership role in embedding ESG principles into the corporate fabric.’ He examines several ways in which in-house counsel can ensure that they carry out this crucial role, from training to curating the very culture of the company.
After all, as Christian W. Schaumann, Head of Central Legal Services at Greiner, points out: ‘ESG principles and compliance is not a trend, but a business enabler and a potential USP in the competition for sustainable business opportunities.’
And, as the majority of our honourees agreed, in-house counsel are are integral to organisational success. As Nicole Christ, Head of Legal (EU/CIS & META) at RHI Magnesita GmbH, puts it: ‘legal acumen is, of course, foundational, but the ability to apply that expertise in a commercially pragmatic, risk-balanced way is what really adds value to the business.’
On 26 March, Legal 500 partnered with Portuguese law firm PLMJ to bring its renewed sustainability‑focused conference series to Lisbon with the ESG Forum: Portugal 2026. The half‑day event gathered senior leaders from the legal, financial, energy and sustainability spheres for a concentrated programme hosted at PLMJ’s offices. Throughout the sessions, speakers explored the regulatory, governance and enforcement forces reshaping ESG strategy in Portugal, offering a clear cross‑sector perspective on how organisations are adapting to an increasingly complex and fast‑moving landscape.
The event opened with some welcome remarks from Legal 500 editor Francisco Castro, who emphasised the value of events that bring the in‑house community together to learn, exchange experiences and build meaningful professional networks. In his welcome address, he highlighted the growing complexity of ESG obligations across Europe and the increasing pressure on organisations to adopt integrated, business‑wide approaches to compliance, risk management and strategic planning. By underscoring the need for practical, grounded discussion rather than abstract theory, he set the tone for a programme designed to deliver actionable insight and foster collaboration among practitioners navigating a rapidly evolving ESG landscape.
Followed an opening brief delivered by PLMJ’s Managing Partner, Bruno Ferreira, who provided a concise yet comprehensive overview of the ESG priorities defining Portugal in 2026. He outlined the expanding influence of EU regulatory frameworks on corporate reporting, due diligence and governance, noting how these requirements are reshaping expectations around data quality, transparency and accountability. His remarks positioned ESG not as a peripheral concern but as a central driver of corporate behaviour, capital flows and long‑term competitiveness in the Portuguese market.
The first panel, moderated by João Marques Mendes, Partner at PLMJ and joined by Cláudia Teixeira de Almeida of Banco BPI, Nuno Moraes Bastos of GALP and Diogo Graça of REN, explored how corporate governance and sustainable finance are shaping Portugal’s energy transition. The discussion examined how boards and executive teams are adapting oversight structures to manage transition‑related risks and how legal, compliance, sustainability and procurement functions are increasingly intertwined in project governance. Panellists described the growing influence of financing structures on project execution, noting that lenders’ expectations around ESG metrics, contractor performance and transparency now shape governance decisions from the earliest stages. They also addressed the operational constraints that continue to challenge Portugal’s transition ambitions, including permitting timelines, grid capacity limitations and delivery risk. While acknowledging the complexity of EU‑level frameworks, speakers emphasised that these standards also present strategic opportunities to harmonise practices, unlock investment and strengthen Portugal’s competitive position in the energy transition.
Following a short break, the second panel turned to litigation, liability and the emerging enforcement era surrounding sustainability claims. Moderated by Raquel Azevedo, Partner at PLMJ and featuring contributions from Carla Góis Coelho of PLMJ, Carlos Martins Ferreira of Jerónimo Martins, Filipa Rodrigues Carmona of Caixa Geral de Depósitos and Céline da Graça Pires of NOVA, the session examined the rapid rise of ESG‑driven disputes, investigations and regulatory actions. Panellists discussed the typical trigger points for scrutiny, ranging from sustainability reports and corporate websites to marketing materials and investor presentations, and highlighted how these touchpoints are increasingly tested by regulators, competitors, consumers and NGOs. They analysed recent case law developments and their implications for Portuguese organisations, noting the emergence of more stringent evidentiary standards around disclosures and due‑diligence obligations. The panel concluded that sustainability claims can no longer be treated as aspirational messaging; they now carry the weight of binding legal obligations, requiring more rigorous internal validation and cross‑functional coordination.
The forum concluded with closing remarks from Francisco Castro, after which attendees were invited to continue their conversations over a light lunch, providing a relaxed setting to deepen connections and reflect on the themes explored throughout the morning.
Legal 500 extends its thanks to PLMJ for its collaboration in bringing this conference format to Portugal’s in‑house legal community. The team looks forward to returning soon for the launch event of this year’s GC Powerlist: Portugal.