Hong Kong: Alternative Investment Funds

This country-specific Q&A provides an overview of Alternative Investment Funds laws and regulations applicable in Hong Kong.

The author would like to thank Amanda Liu for her contributions to this chapter.

  1. What are the principal legal structures used for Alternative Investment Funds?

  2. Does a structure provide limited liability to the sponsor and/or manager vis-a-vis investors?

  3. Is there a market preference and/or most preferred structure? Does it depend on asset class?

  4. Does the regulatory regime distinguish between open-ended and closed-ended Alternative Investment Funds (or otherwise differentiate between different types of funds or strategies (e.g. private equity vs. hedge)) and, if so, how?

  5. Are there any limits on the manager’s ability to restrict redemptions? What factors determine the degree of liquidity that a manager offers investor of an Alternative Investment Fund?

  6. What are potential tools that a manager may use to manage illiquidity risks regarding the portfolio of its Alternative Investment Fund?

  7. Are there any restrictions on transfers of investors’ interests?

  8. Are there any other limitations on a manager’s ability to manage its funds (e.g., diversification requirements)?

  9. What is the local tax treatment of (a) resident, (b) non-resident, and (c) pension fund investors (or any other common investor type) in Alternative Investment Funds? Does the tax treatment of the target investment dictate the structure of the Alternative Investment Fund?

  10. What rights do investors typically have with respect to the management or operations of the Alternative Investment Fund?

  11. Are managers or advisers to Alternative Investment Funds required to be licensed, authorised or regulated by a regulatory body?

  12. Are Alternative Investment Funds themselves required to be licensed, authorised or regulated by a regulatory body?

  13. Are there local residence or other local qualification or substance requirements?

  14. What service providers are required?

  15. Are local resident directors / trustees required?

  16. What rules apply to foreign managers or advisers wishing to manage, advise, or otherwise operate funds domiciled in your jurisdiction?

  17. What are common enforcement risks that managers face with respect to the management of their Alternative Investment Funds? 

  18. What is the typical level of management fee paid? Does it vary by asset type?

  19. Is a performance fee typical? If so, does it commonly include a “high water mark”, “hurdle”, “water-fall” or other condition? If so, please explain.

  20. Are founder shares (which offer a reduce fee structure for initial investors) typical in raising assets for new fund launches?

  21. Are management fee “break-points” offered based on investment size?

  22. Are first loss programs used as a source of capital (i.e., a managed account into which the manager contributes approximately 10-20% of the account balance and the remainder is furnished by the investor)?

  23. What is the typical terms of a seeding / acceleration program?

  24. What industry trends have recently developed regarding management fees and incentive fees? 

  25. What restrictions are there on marketing Alternative Investment Funds?

  26. Is the concept of “pre-marketing” (or equivalent) recognised in your jurisdiction? If so, how has it been defined (by law and/or practice)?

  27. Can Alternative Investment Funds be marketed to retail investors?

  28. What are the minimum investor qualification requirements?

  29. Are there additional restrictions on marketing to government entities or pensions?

  30. Are there any restrictions on the use of intermediaries to assist in the fundraising process?

  31. Is the use of “side letters” restricted?

  32. Are there any disclosure requirements with respect to side letters?

  33. What are the most common side letter terms? What industry trends have recently developed regarding side letter terms?