Hugill & Ip | View firm profile
Divorce is rarely a straightforward process, and when children are involved, the emotional stakes are even higher. Among the most distressing issues that can emerge is parental alienation, a phenomenon where one parent — whether consciously or unconsciously — undermines the child’s relationship with the other parent. Over time, this can lead to the child rejecting a once-loved parent without legitimate justification, causing profound emotional harm.
In Hong Kong, where family law draws heavily from English common law principles, the Courts are increasingly attuned to the damaging effects of parental alienation and its long-term consequences for children.
Understanding Parental Alienation
There is no legal or unified definition of “parental alienation”. In the case of Re S (Parental Alienation: Cult: Transfer of Parental Care) [2020] EWCA Civ 568 , which is frequently cited in Hong Kong cases, the Judge borrowed the CAFCASS’s definition of alienation :
“When a child’s resistance/ hostility towards one parent is not justified and is the result of psychological manipulation by the other parent.”
The Judge further added that the manipulation does not have to be malicious or deliberation. “It is the process that matters, not the motive.” However, regardless of intent, the impact on the child can be devastating. Common behaviours associated with alienation include persistently speaking ill of the other parent, restricting contact without valid reason, making false allegations of abuse, or subtly encouraging the child to view one parent as the “good” parent and the other as unworthy of love. Over time, the child may internalise these negative perceptions, leading to estrangement that can persist well into adulthood.
The legal framework in Hong Kong
Hong Kong’s approach to parental alienation is shaped by a combination of statutory provisions and case law. The Guardianship of Minors Ordinance (Cap 13) enshrines the principle that the child’s welfare is the paramount consideration in any custody or access dispute. Meanwhile, the Matrimonial Proceedings and Property Ordinance (Cap 192) provides the legal basis for determining custody and visitation rights. While there is no specific legislation addressing parental alienation, Hong Kong Courts have demonstrated a willingness to tackle the issue by drawing on established common law principles and expert psychological evidence.
One of the key challenges in parental alienation cases is proving that alienation is occurring, as opposed to a child’s natural reluctance to spend time with a parent for legitimate reasons (such as past conflict or abuse). Courts often rely on third party evidence including social welfare reports, and child psychologists’ assessments to determine whether a parent’s behaviour is actively poisoning the child’s relationship with the other parent. There are also procedures in Hong Kong whereby a Judge can talk to the child directly before making the necessary fact finding.
How Courts respond to Parental Alienation
When parental alienation is established, Hong Kong Courts adopt a nuanced approach tailored to the severity of the case. The primary objective is always to restore the child’s relationship with the alienated parent, provided it is in the child’s best interests. In less severe cases, where alienation behaviours are identified early, the Court may first attempt non-punitive interventions. These often include mandatory family therapy or counselling sessions designed to address the underlying emotional dynamics and facilitate reconciliation. The Court may also issue specific directions to the alienating parent, such as refraining from negative comments about the other parent or ensuring compliance with visitation schedules.
For severe cases where alienation is entrenched and the child exhibits extreme rejection of a parent, this may justify transferring primary custody from the alienating parent to the alienated parent to prevent long term harm to the child. Such decisions are never taken lightly and are always accompanied by continuous psychological support for the child. In rare instances where a parent persistently violates court orders — for example, by intentionally breaching undertakings not to badmouth the other parent — the Court may impose contempt sanctions such as jail time.
Preventing Parental Alienation: the need for a proactive approach
Given the profound long-term damage on a child caused by parental alienation and the limitations of legal remedies, prevention or early fact finding must be a priority for divorcing parents and professionals alike. The foundation of prevention lies in education and awareness. Many parents engaging in alienating behaviours do not fully grasp the psychological harm they’re inflicting on their children.
Effective communication between co-parents is another critical preventive measure. Even in high-conflict divorces, establishing clear boundaries around child-related discussions can prevent the spillover of adult disputes into the parent-child relationship. Tools like parenting apps are gaining popularity in Hong Kong as they provide a neutral platform for scheduling and communication while creating an auditable record that can be useful if disputes arise.
For parents already navigating post-divorce co-parenting, structured parenting plans can serve as an alienation preventative. These detailed agreements — covering everything from holiday schedules to protocols for introducing new partners — reduce ambiguity that might otherwise fuel conflict.
Schools and extracurricular providers also play an often-overlooked role in prevention. Teachers and coaches in Hong Kong are increasingly trained to spot abnormality of a child, such as a child suddenly refusing to discuss one parent or parroting negative statements about a previously loved parent. Early identification allows for timely referrals to school counsellors or social workers before patterns become entrenched.
Protecting children in high-conflict divorces
Parental alienation represents one of the most complex challenges in family law, blending legal principles with deep psychological undercurrents. Hong Kong’s legal system, while rooted in common law traditions, continues to evolve in its response — increasingly recognising alienation as a serious threat to children’s welfare that demands both judicial and therapeutic interventions.
The most effective solutions emerge when the legal system, mental health professionals, and parents themselves work collaboratively. Courts can order remedies, but lasting change requires parents to commit to putting their children’s needs above their own conflicts. For families navigating these difficult waters, early legal advice combined with psychological support provides the strongest foundation for protecting children’s emotional well-being.
As Hong Kong’s family justice system continues to develop, there is growing recognition that addressing parental alienation requires more than just legal tools — it demands a cultural shift in how we approach post-divorce parenting. By prioritising children’s rights to love and be loved by both parents, we can mitigate one of the most painful consequences of family breakdown.
Author: Raphael Wong