AI HALLUCINATIONS: WHEN CREATION COMES AT A COST, WHO PAYS?
Artificial Intelligence has transformed the way information is processed and consumed, offering unprecedented capabilities and value across fields like medicine, law, journalism, and finance.
M/S. DAKSHIN GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LIMITED V. M/S. GAYATRI SHAKTI PAPER AND BOARD LIMITED AND ANOTHER, ETC._ CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 8527-8529 OF 2009
In a landmark judgment delivered on 09.10.2023, the Hon’ble Supreme Court has finally settled the conundrum arising out of the conflicting interpretations of Rule 3 of the Electricity Rules,
M/S. DAKSHIN GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LIMITED V. M/S. GAYATRI SHAKTI PAPER AND BOARD LIMITED AND ANOTHER, ETC._ CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 8527-8529 OF 2009
In a landmark judgment delivered on 09.10.2023, the Hon’ble Supreme Court has finally settled the conundrum arising out of the conflicting interpretations of Rule 3 of the Electricity Rules, 2005 (“Rules”) as given by the Hon’ble APTEL in the two judgments i.e. Kadodara Power Pvt. Ltd. and Others v. Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission (“Kadodra Power”),
FOURTH SCHEDULE TO ARBITRATION ACT: SUPREME COURT TO SETTLE THE CONUNDRUM IN ESSE
I Introduction: Alternative Dispute Resolution mechanism (commonly known as ADR mechanism”) has prevailed in India since its medieval period. While the panchayat system i.e., a form of ADR mechanism, was predominant in the country for being cheap and easily accessible with liberal procedural laws, the hierarchy of court system propounded by the Britishers has changed …
Continue reading “FOURTH SCHEDULE TO ARBITRATION ACT: SUPREME COURT TO SETTLE THE CONUNDRUM IN ESSE”
Unconstitutionality of Section 3(2) of the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act 1988
It is a well settled principle of law that any enactment which substantially affects the rights of people cannot be applied retrospectively. This was upheld by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Union of India v. Ganpati Dealcom Pvt. Ltd., CIVIL APPEAL No. 5783 of 2022, decided on 23.08.2022, wherein it was declared that Section 3(2) and Section …
FOURTH SCHEDULE TO ARBITRATION ACT: SUPREME COURT TO SETTLE THE CONUNDRUM IN ESSE
Alternative Dispute Resolution mechanism (commonly known as ADR mechanism”) has prevailed in India since its medieval period. While the panchayat system i.e., a form of ADR mechanism, was predominant in the country for being cheap and easily accessible with liberal procedural laws, the hierarchy of court system propounded by the Britishers has changed the landscape …
Continue reading “FOURTH SCHEDULE TO ARBITRATION ACT: SUPREME COURT TO SETTLE THE CONUNDRUM IN ESSE”
AN INSIGHT INTO PROPOSED REGULATORY REGIME ON VIRTUAL ONLINE SPORTS IN RAJASTHAN
Authored by – Mr. Rishi Anand, Partner; Mr. Chirag Jain, Principal Associate and Ms. Shruti Agrawal, Associate
CERT-IN ISSUES DIRECTIONS AND CLARIFICATIONS RELATING TO CYBER SECURITY PRACTICES
Authored by – Mr. Rishi Anand, Partner; Mr. Nakul Batra, Associate Partner and Mr. Kunal Garg, Associate.
Covid-19 and The Changing Landscape of Deal Making
It has been nearly 18 months since the onset of the pandemic and the world has already experienced far reaching implications of Covid-19. While the impact of Covid-19 has affected every country, every sector and every business, the impact has been rather brutal on some countries and especially on some sectors and businesses. For e.g. …
Continue reading “Covid-19 and The Changing Landscape of Deal Making”
Delicate Balance of Doing Complete Justice- Supreme Court’s Judgment in NHAI v. M. Hakeem
Introduction The Supreme Court of India has passed a judgment in a batch of over 50 appeals on the question as to whether the Courts are empowered to modify an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (“Arbitration Act”) when they are adjudicating an application for setting aside an award …