Search

Search

Log in or registerMenuClose

Search

Rankings
Firms & Lawyers
In-House
- In-House Content
- GC Powerlist
Knowledge Centre
- About us

Comparative Guides
Events
Legal 500 TV

About us

Legal 500
FAQs
Marketing
Careers
Trust Centre
Contact us

Deutschland DE
Paris FR

Rankings
Firms & Lawyers
In-House
- In-House Content
- GC Powerlist
Knowledge Centre
- About us

Comparative Guides
Events
Legal 500 TV

About us

Legal 500
FAQs
Marketing
Careers
Trust Centre
Contact us

Deutschland DE
Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

Legal 500 Trust Centre
Contact Us

Market Intelligence
Search

619 results found

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

Search

2 filters applied

Advanced search filters

Topics

Search for topics

Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
- Arbitration & Dispute Resolution
- Civil Law
- Class Actions
- Court Procedure
- Disclosure & Electronic Discovery & Privilege
- Libel & Defamation
- Personal Injury
- Professional Negligence
- Sovereign Immunity: Public Sector Government
- Trials & Appeals & Compensation
Accounting and Audit
Antitrust/Competition Law
Cannabis & Hemp
Compliance
Consumer Protection
Coronavirus (COVID-19)
Corporate/Commercial Law
Criminal Law
Employment and HR
Energy and Natural Resources
Environment
Family and Matrimonial
Finance and Banking
Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
Government, Public Sector
Immigration
Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
Insurance
Intellectual Property
International Law
Law Department Performance
Law Practice Management
Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
Privacy
Real Estate and Construction
Strategy
Tax
Technology
Transport
Wealth Management

Countries

Search for countries

Contributor

Search to show contributors

Start typing to add contributors

Content type

Any
Article
Podcast
Video

Sort by

Article
Intellectual Property Protection By Chinese Courts In 2013
2013 is the initial year which the people’s courts applied the principles of the 18th Party Congress.
ChinaIntellectual Property
Beijing East IP Law Firm
Article
劳动合同解除最后的"底线"——浅析民法基本原则的适用
近年来，我们看到越来越多的地方性口径规定劳动者除遵守规章制度外，还需要遵守诚实信用、劳动纪律和职业道德等，在用人单位没有相关#
ChinaEmployment and HR
AnJie Broad Law Firm
Article
Top 10 Intellectual Property Cases Of Chinese Courts In 2017

Case of Patent Infringement Dispute Administrative Processing between Xixia Longcheng Special Material Co., Ltd. and Yulin Intellectual Property Office, Shaanxi Coal and Chemical Industry Group ...

ChinaIntellectual Property

Beijing Sanyou Intellectual Property Agency Ltd.

专利创造性审查中"相反的技术启示"的判断

专利创造性审查中"相反的技术启示"的判断 时间：2022-10-27作者：姜雁琪分享到：   点击打印文章一、引言在专利的审查以及无效等程序中A

ChinaIntellectual Property

CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office

未经公证认证的域外证据应当如何认定

该证据为域外证据，未经公证认证，缺乏证据必备的形式要件，法院不予采信...

ChinaIntellectual Property

CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office

新《公司法解释（征求意见稿）》诉讼实操探析 ——关于解散公司的诉讼主体列设等问题

最高院新发布的《关于适用〈中华人民共和国公司法〉若干问题的解释（征求意见稿）》（下称"《意见稿》"）发布后，笔者注意到有关"解散公司į

ChinaCorporate/Commercial Law

Jincheng Tongda & Neal

民事诉讼中程序问题适用法院地法原则下证明标准在我国涉外司法实践中的适用问题

程序问题适用法院地法这一原则系国际民事诉讼程序中国际社会通识的法律适用原则。

ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Jincheng Tongda & Neal

诉责险项下的财产保全申请错误如何认定？——以案例库最新案例为视角

诉讼财产"保全程序是为了配合审判程序、执行程序或者其他权利保护程序中对权利人的保护而设置的程序，始终以实现本案权利为依归"。因此&#

AnJie Broad Law Firm

稀土反垄断诉讼案件的价值与意义 --写在最高法院判决之际

2024年年初，安杰世泽反垄断团队拿到了最高法院下达的稀土反垄断民事诉讼二审判决书。

ChinaIntellectual Property

AnJie Broad Law Firm

侵害数据权益案件中的数据类型及司法认定

侵害数据权益案件的裁判结果，除受到司法裁判路径、被诉行为类型等因素的影响外，还受到涉案数据类型的影响。在司法实践中，法院通常

AnJie Broad Law Firm

雇主责任险法律基础与条款设计研究——基于劳动关系与劳务关系的比较分析

在现代企业经营管理中，雇主责任风险已成为不可忽视的重要议题。雇主责任险以被保险人依法对雇员在受雇期间因工遭受人身伤害、死亡或职业

ChinaEmployment and HR

AnJie Broad Law Firm

强区放权以来深圳城市更新纠纷的态势研究

强区放权以来，深圳市城市更新政策加速推出，呈现出 "政策多"、"变化快"、"区域差异化"特征。在此背景下，城市更新纠纷出现了与以往不同的Ū

ChinaReal Estate and Construction

DeHeng Law Offices

Patent Laws And Regulations China 2026

Before what tribunals can a patent be enforced against an infringer? Is there a choice between tribunals and what would influence a claimant's choice?

ChinaIntellectual Property

Fangda Partners

民事抗诉再审案件司法实务观察报告（下）—— 以近5年广东高院再审审查和审理民事抗诉案件为研究样本

因本文篇幅较长，为便于读者阅读，现分为上下两篇刊登。

ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Jincheng Tongda & Neal

律师费转移支付制度在境外的适用和例外

律师费转移支付制度是指由败诉方承担胜诉方律师费用的制度。律师费承担的制度设计涉及到当事人的诉讼成本、司法资源的有效利用和公平

ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

DeHeng Law Offices

简议破产个别清偿撤销之例外情形

从法律性质上看，管理人在破产程序中可行使的撤销权分为两类，其一是根据企业破产法第31条规定，对于欺诈行为的撤销；其二是根据企业破&#

ChinaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

AnJie Broad Law Firm

外国法院判决在中国承认与执行概览

有效的跨境执行能确保判决在域外能够得以实现，落实判决的实践价值.

ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Jincheng Tongda & Neal

印度尼西亚版权诉讼

适用的法规包括2020年第16号政府条例，即《关于作品及相关权利产品登记的条例》（于2020年2月26日签署），该条例旨在实施 2014 年《版权法》中关于版&

ChinaIntellectual Property

信用证/备用信用证和独立保函开证银行作为诉讼被告或第三人的上诉权研究

在中国法院审理信用证或备用信用证或见索即付独立保函的民事程序中，当一审法院经过实体审理作出实体判决，判决开证行终止在用证或备用信用证或见索即付独立保函项下的付款义务时...

ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Jincheng Tongda & Neal

最高人民法院 "澳大利亚和新西兰银行集团有限公司马尼拉分行与中国电力工程有限公司、江苏银行股份有限公司等备用信用证纠纷案"民事申请再审审查裁定书（2024年10月24日）判决缩写和点评

本案涉及一项跨境保备用信用证纠纷，其重大意义在于最高院在本案判决中明确了具有担保功能的备用信用证应当适用独立保函司法解释。

ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Jincheng Tongda & Neal

Showing 581–600 of 619 results

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics