The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Veirano Advogados

AV PRESIDENTE WILSON, 231, 25Âș ANDAR – RIO DE JANEIRO, RJ 20030-021, BRAZIL
Tel:
Work +55 21 3824 4747
Fax:
Fax +55 21 2262 4247
Email:
Web:
www.veirano.com.br
Brasilia, Porto Alegre, Rio de Janeiro, Sao Paulo

Pedro Garcia

Tel:
Work +55 21 3824 4747
Email:
Web:
www.veirano.com.br
Veirano Advogados

Work Department

Mining, Corporate & Mergers and Acquisitions, Infrastructure & Projects and Antitrust & Competition

Position

Partner

Career

Pedro Garcia is a recognized practitioner in the areas of contracts and corporate law, regulatory and antitrust, with significant experience in the mining and infrastructure sectors. Pedro is the Firm’s regional coordinator for the Mining Practice Group in Rio de Janeiro. He brings extensive knowledge to client projects, providing expert counsel on local and cross-border transactions, negotiating and drafting of commercial agreements, antitrust proceedings, and regulatory, real estate and environmental issues for mining ventures. Mr. Garcia is also a member of the Board of Directors of the World Initiative of Mining Lawyers - WIOML.

Mining clients frequently retain Mr. Garcia to advise them on a variety of areas specific to the industry, including the structuring of new investments in mining projects, purchase and sale transactions for exploration and exploitation tenements, and due diligences before the National Department of Mineral Production (DNPM). Clients also rely upon his counsel in drafting option and lease agreements, farm-in/farm-outs, streaming and royalty contracts. Mr. Garcia has also advised clients on mergers and acquisitions, financing of mining ventures, ore purchase and sale agreements, environmental issues, surface rights arrangements and service agreements.

From the antitrust perspective, Mr. Garcia’s experience includes handling antitrust proceedings across multiple industries, including mining, oil & gas, infrastructure and finance. He is well versed in the analysis of potentially anti-competitive agreements and submission for approval of proposed mergers and acquisitions before the Administrative Council of Economic Defense (CADE). Mr. Garcia also focuses on the negotiation of terms of performance commitment and economic restrictions with the antitrust authorities, anti-competitive practice proceedings and compliance programs.

Mr. Garcia brings a unique global perspective to clients gained from his experience working and studying abroad. He spent two years in Europe working as a foreign attorney with Simmons & Simmons in their London and Lisbon offices, where he focused his practice on corporate law, capital markets and antitrust law. During this time Mr. Garcia also took post-graduate courses at the University of Lisbon and University of London. Fluent in Spanish, Mr. Garcia is deeply involved with the Latin Desk of Veirano Advogados.

Languages

Portuguese, English and Spanish

Member

Brazilian Mining Institute (IBRAM), Legal Commission
British Chamber of Commerce (BRITCHAM), Mining Committee
Center of Advanced Mining Studies (CEAMIN)
Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada (PDAC)
Rocky Mountain Mineral Law Foundation
Brazilian Bar Association (OAB) – Rio de Janeiro
Portuguese Bar Association – Portugal

Education

LL.B, Pontifica Universidade Catolica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-RJ), 1998
EC Competition Law, King’s College, University of London, UK, 2003-2004
International Contracts, Classic College of the University of Lisbon, Portugal, 2002-2003


Brazil: Energy and natural resources

Mining

Within: Leading individuals

Pedro Garcia - Veirano Advogados

Within: Mining

Veirano Advogados’ mining team leverages the wider firm’s expertise in project finance and real estate to pack a punch in project development. The group also handles a varied mix of corporate finance, regulatory and environmental matters, including litigation. In a highlight example of its strength in cross-border deals, Pedro Garcia acted as Brazilian counsel for Leagold on its headline multi-jurisdictional acquisition of Brio Gold. On the contentious side, Garcia advised AngloGold Ashanti on various expansion issues related to its gold mining operations, including representing it before the Mining Agency. Carlos Americo Castro and Pedro Freitas are also recommended.

[back to top]


Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • CommuniquĂ© on Equity Crowdfunding Is Officially Published

    By way of background, in January 2019, the Capital Markets Board (“ CMB ”) had issued an announcement on its website on the Draft CommuniquĂ© on Equity Crowdfunding [1] . The CMB has now officially published the CommuniquĂ© on Crowdfunding No. III-35/A (“ CommuniquĂ© ”), on October 3, 2019. The CommuniquĂ© entered into force as of October 3, 2019.
  • Beneficial Ownership Concept new interpretation from the Russian federal tax service

    The recent interpretative letter issued by the Russian Federal Tax Services (“FTS”) on 08th August 2019, has provided further guidance as to the application of the Beneficial Ownership Concept, further to the letter initially provided on the 12th of April 2018 which adopted a strict approach of the concept. 
  • Cyprus and Netherlands Double Tax Treaty Update

    Cyprus has concluded the negotiations for the avoidance of double taxation with the Netherlands. The double tax treaty was agreed at technocratic level in Hague. It is expected to be signed by the end of 2019 or early in 2020.
  • Vacancy - Senior Corporate Lawyer

    The Senior Corporate Lawyer, who will be reporting to Partners, will be working with both the firm’s legal team as well as the financial services team. The successful candidate will be requested to show initiative, take on certain responsibilities within the firm, work in a multinational environment and will immediately be given the opportunity to further advance their career within the law firm.
  • CJEU RULED ON THE APPLICATION OF THE BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP CONCEPT

    The judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on February 26, 2019, in the “Danish Beneficial Ownership Cases”, can be perceived as a landmark on the interpretation of the Beneficial Ownership concept under the Interest and Royalties Directive (IRD) and the Parent-Subsidiary Directive (PSD).
  • Court of Justice rules on source of income for Derivative Residence applications

    On 2 October 2019, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Bajratari v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Directive 2004/38/EC) Case C-93/18 which concerns Chen applications and the source of funds for self-sufficiency. 
  • End of the ‘centre of life test’ in Surinder Singh cases?

    In the recent case of  ZA (Reg 9. EEA Regs; abuse of rights) Afghanistan   [2019] UKUT 281 (IAC ), the Upper Tribunal found that there is no basis in EU law for the centre of life test, as set out in Regulation 9(3)(a) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (the “Regulations”). It further found that it is not to be applied when Judges assess  Surinder Singh  cases that appear before them.
  • ITALIAN RULES ON JOINT VENTURES IN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AND CONCESSIONS

    Italian rules on jointventures concerning public procurement and concession contracts are set out inlight of the European legal framework provided for in Directive 2014/23/EU and 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council. The European rules aim to ensurethe best use of public money so that EU citizens benefit from strategicinvestments and services at fair prices. In this context, public procurementand concessions represent key instruments that need to be regulated and standardisedin order to ensure free movement of goods, freedom of establishment and freedomto provide services.
  • Terms of employment as a sole representative

    In this article we examine the working arrangements of sole representatives, looking at the terms and conditions of employment that the Home Office will expect a sole representative to have in order to qualify as a representative of an overseas business.  
  • Can Sole Representatives Be Shareholders?

    The Immigration Rules require that an applicant for a  sole representative visa  is not “a  majority shareholder in the overseas business”.