Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 FEBRUARY 2024

Frivolous Litigation: A Warning To Practitioners

In the case of Strydom and Another v Coomans and Others, the North West Division of the High Court ruled against attorneys billing clients for frivolous and thoughtless litigation.

South AfricaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In the case of Strydom and Another v Coomans and Others, the North West Division of the High Court ruled against attorneys billing clients for frivolous and thoughtless litigation. The court emphasised that such a practice would constitute an injustice committed by an attorney against their own client for the attorney's personal financial gain and a waste of the judiciary's invaluable time and its limited resources.

Background

On 16 November 2023, the court handed down a written judgment and on 14 December 2023, the applicant's attorney requested reasons as to why the court refused to grant leave to appeal in the aforesaid judgment.

The critical question before the court was whether an attorney could invoice their client for the costs associated with the drafting and filing of a court's reasoning for its judgment and any further legal steps thereafter if such reasons were already being elaborated upon by the court.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from