Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 JULY 2025

Bald Denials And Unsubstantiated Conclusions In Pleadings: A Risky Litigation Strategy

The Gauteng Division of the High Court of South Africa, Johannesburg in Mbiza and Another v Timati considered a contempt of court application that was instituted by Mr Mbiza...

South AfricaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The Gauteng Division of the High Court of South Africa, Johannesburg in Mbiza and Another v Timati considered a contempt of court application that was instituted by Mr Mbiza, a spiritual guide and founder of the Revelation Spiritual Home ("the church"), and by the church against Mr Timati, a former member of the church.

This application followed an order that was granted in the urgent court on 21 June 2023 in terms of which Mr Timati was interdicted from inter alia disseminating directly and indirectly injurious falsehoods about Mr Mbiza and the church pending the outcome of Part B of the application (which concerned final interdictory relief against Mr Timati). Mr Mbiza and the church contended that Mr Timati is in contempt of the urgent court order as a result of certain offending statements that were posted by Mr Timati on Facebook, in contravention of the court order.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from