Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 MAY 2024

Settlement Agreements: Can Courts Unilaterally Alter Their Terms?

In the judgment handed down on 25 April 2024, Mafisa v Road Accident Fund and Another, the Constitutional Court dealt with an application for leave to appeal...

South AfricaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In the judgment handed down on 25 April 2024, Mafisa v Road Accident Fund and Another, the Constitutional Court dealt with an application for leave to appeal against an order granted by the Free State Division of the High Court, which had unilaterally altered the terms of a settlement agreement concluded between the Road Accident Fund (“RAF”) and Tumalo Mafisa.

The road to litigation

On 31 January 2016, Mafisa was involved in a motor vehicle accident which, according to him, was caused by the sole negligence of the driver who collided with a tree. As a result, Mafisa suffered bodily injuries and thereafter issued summons against the Road Accident Fund (“RAF”) for past and future medical expenses together with loss of income, and general damages. The RAF disputed both liability and the quantum of the claim.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from