Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

134 results found

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

2 filters applied

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor

Start typing to add contributors

Content type
Show options
  • Article

    《建工解释二》下代位权诉讼如何破局:从驳回至改判,债权人代位权实务难点——以(2026)粤06民终6324号案为例

    《建工解释二》实施后,实际施工人如何通过代位权诉讼向发包人主张工程款?本文以(2026)粤06民终6324案为例,深度剖析代位权诉讼的三大核心难点:如何证明
    ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
  • Article

    各大法域下对仲裁裁决进行上诉的可行性

    "一裁终局"是仲裁的基本原则,一般情况下当仲裁裁决作出后,当事人就同一纠纷申请再次仲裁或另行起诉的,将不被受理。
    ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    AllBright Law Offices
    AllBright Law Offices
  • Article

The Boundaries Of AI In Judicial Proceedings: From Parties To Lawyers

As artificial intelligence tools become increasingly integrated into legal practice, critical questions emerge about privilege protections and professional responsibilities. Recent court rulings and regulatory guidance are establishing new boundaries for how parties and their counsel may use AI platforms when handling confidential case information, with significant implications for litigation strategy and attorney conduct.
ChinaTechnology
Jincheng Tongda & Neal
Jincheng Tongda & Neal
  • Article

    Service Of Process In Cross-Border Litigation: Comparing U.S. And UPC Practice (Part 1)

    Cross-border litigation presents unique challenges when serving process on foreign defendants, particularly for Chinese companies facing U.S. federal or Unified Patent Court proceedings. Understanding the fundamental differences between common law and civil law approaches to service, along with the requirements of the Hague Service Convention, is essential for protecting procedural rights and ensuring the enforceability of judgments.
    ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Purplevine IP Group
    Purplevine IP Group
  • Article

    英国法下不满仲裁裁决的法院救济之路

    "一裁终局"是仲裁的基本原则,一般情况下当仲裁裁决作出后,当事人就同一纠纷申请再次仲裁或另行起诉的,将不被受理。
    ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    AllBright Law Offices
    AllBright Law Offices
  • Article

    商品房消费者“超级优先权”扩张下金融机构抵押权如何应对?——以《执行异议之诉解释》第十一条为中心

    The 2025 Supreme People's Court Interpretation on Execution Objection Litigation introduces a pivotal shift in protecting commercial housing consumers' rights over mortgage rights held by financial institutions.
    ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
  • Article

    Enforcing U.S. Judgments In China: What Judgment Creditors Need To Know

    It is still not easy or inexpensive to enforce a U.S. court judgment in China. And it is also far from automatic. But Chinese courts have become more willing to recognize and enforce foreign civil and commercial...
    GlobalLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Harris Sliwoski
    Harris Sliwoski
  • Article

    刑民交叉商标侵权案的维权新尝试

    知识产权权利人通常希望采取刑事处罚和民事赔偿方式有效地制止和惩罚制假售假行为并挽回经济损失,而司法实践中知识产权保护领域的刑
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Lusheng Law Firm
    Lusheng Law Firm
  • Article

    Clash Of Civil And Common Law: Case Guidance System v. Stare Decisis

    On May 13, 2015, the highest judicial institution in China, the Supreme People's Court, issued the Detailed Rules of Implementation of the Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Case Guidance Work...
    ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Sheppard
    Sheppard
  • Article

    Can You Subpoena A Chinese Company? What You Need To Know About China Discovery

    Cross-border litigation involving Chinese companies presents unique discovery challenges that U.S. litigators must navigate carefully. Understanding the limits of subpoena enforcement...
    GlobalLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Harris Sliwoski
    Harris Sliwoski
  • Article

    2025 Typical Intellectual Property Cases

    Administrative Case on Distinctiveness of a Phrase Mark: Company A vs. China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA), Administrative Dispute over Refusal of Trademark Application...
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    AFD China
    AFD China
  • Article

    《关于办理贪污贿赂刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释(二)》核心要点梳理

    中国最高人民法院和最高人民检察院联合发布《关于办理贪污贿赂刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释(二)》,这是继2016年首部解释施行十年后的
    ChinaCriminal Law
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
  • Article

    ANZ Bank, Manila Branch v. China National Electric Engineering Co., Ltd. & Bank Of Jiangsu [2024] (2024) Zui Gao Fa Min Shen No. 2800 [PRC]

    Retrial application dismissed in case involving a dispute over alleged fraud and application the PRC Independent Guarantee Provisions to a standby LC governed by ISP98
    ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
  • Article

    文书"跨境"新时代 —《取消外国公文书认证要求的公约》评析

    2023年11月7日,《取消外国公文书认证要求的公约》(Convention Abolishing the Requirement of Legalisation for Foreign Public Documents...
    ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
  • Article

    涉消费者格式合同仲裁条款有效性案例研究

    随着多元化纠纷解决机制的发展,...
    ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    DeHeng Law Offices
    DeHeng Law Offices
  • Article

    案外人针对保全错误的救济

    我们知道在生效法律文书执行阶段,法院保全了债务人名下的财产,拟进行执行的,若案外人认为自己是该财产的所有权人,可以向执行法院
    ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    DeHeng Law Offices
    DeHeng Law Offices
  • Article

    民刑交叉案件“同一事实”的认定方法——以《关于审理涉及刑事犯罪的民事纠纷案件若干问题的规定》为中心

    The Supreme People's Court's 2026 judicial interpretation establishes a dual-criteria framework for determining when civil and criminal cases involve "the same facts," requiring both identical...
    ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
  • Article

    《关于办理贪污贿赂刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释(二)》中职务犯罪的三大辩护维度

    最高人民法院、最高人民检察院联合发布《关于办理贪污贿赂刑事案件适用法律若干问题的解释(二)》,为职务犯罪辩护带来新的挑战与机遇。
    ChinaCriminal Law
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
  • Article

    中国法院永久终止独立保函付款的法律原则:中国法和最高法院案例回顾(下篇)

    [摘要]:中国最高法院2016年制定并颁布的《独立保函司法解释》第二十条设定了永久终止见索即付独立保函的严格的前提条件,审视这些条件特别是这些条件在中国最高法院本身审理的实际的诉讼案件中如何实际适用...
    ChinaFinance and Banking
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
  • Article

    英国《2025年仲裁法》修订: 兼顾仲裁公正性和效率的关键变化

    英国《2025年仲裁法》(Arbitration Act 2025)xvii已于2025年2月24日获得皇家批准,这是对施行近30年的《1996年仲裁法》(Arbitration Act 1996)的修改xviii。此次修法旨在进一步推动《1996年&#
    ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
  • Showing 101–120 of 134 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics