Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 SEPTEMBER 2009

Second Judicial Explanation On PRC Contract Law

On 24 April 2009, the PRC Supreme Court issued the Second Judicial Explanation on the PRC Contract Law (“Second Judicial Explanation”).

ChinaCorporate/Commercial Law

This article was first published in Asian Counsels country files, www.pbpress.com

A discussion of issues such as formation, validity, performance, termination and damages

On 24 April 2009, the PRC Supreme Court issued the Second Judicial Explanation on the PRC Contract Law ("Second Judicial Explanation"). This Second Judicial Explanation treats contract law issues that were not covered or remained unclear in the existing legislation and the first judicial explanation.

1. Formation of a contract

Article 1 of the Second Judicial Explanation clarifies the existence of three indispensable elements for formation of a contract: contract parties, contract object and quantity. Failure to agree on other matters should "generally" not impair formation of a contract, unless the law otherwise provides or the parties otherwise agree upon.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from