Wang Ling: Dare to tackle new areas

How would you define your firm’s culture? How important is firm culture to you?

If I had to summarise our culture in one word it would be collaboration. By that I mean not only collaboration internally and with clients, but also with other professionals, including from other law firms.

Client-centric, commitment and dedication, collaboration and sharing, teamwork, and striving for excellence.

The firm’s culture defines us as who we are and how we get here. As the firm expands and more people join us, it is important that we share the same value. This culture binds us together and motivates our people to release their potential and increase cohesion. It will also attract talents who appreciate the same culture. It ensures healthy expansion, stable and sustainable development, as well as enables us to achieve common goals and face challenges. We appreciated very much our clients’ recognition of our firm’s culture.

What’s the main change you’ve made in the firm that will benefit clients?

It is our top priority to provide high quality and efficient services to our clients. In addition to continuously improving our service quality and consistency of the quality among the firm, in recent years, we also took several structural development and initiatives based on our understanding of the client business strategic direction and the opportunities provided by the country’s economic development policies, to ensure us enter the same market with our clients.

As our clients’ businesses become more and more sophisticated, we need to grow with the clients in multiple dimensions, from the scope of services, to geographical landscape and new areas of legal service and products. To satisfy fast increasing demands of the client service, we must understand the industry and our clients’ business goals as well. The firm has been working towards industry focus and coordinating our legal resources of different practice groups and regions with very clear vision on certain traditional and emerging industries, such as energy, medical and healthcare, TMT, fintech, etc.

Our firm has been regarded as the fore runner in many practice and sectors by the clients and market, such as fintech, cyber securities, debt-for-equity Swap, securitisation/ABS, and so on. Having been involved in many industry sectors’ ‘firsts’, now KWM is deemed by peers and clients as being able to offer the most cutting-edge services in some areas of practice and complicated deals/cases.

In April, 2018, we announced the establishment of KWM International Center (KWMIC) in the Greater Bay Area, corresponding to the countries’ new development strategy of forming China’s Great Bay Area, combining the Pearl River Delta of Mainland, HK SAR, and Macau SAR into one economic entity. This strategic move will further enhance regional integration of our four offices in South China (Shenzhen, Guangzhou, Hong Kong ,and San Ya) as well as globalisation of the firm in general.

KWMIC focuses on providing an integrated service offering to assist our Chinese and international clients with exploring more business opportunities in the Greater Bay Area, including Belt and Road projects, cross-border investments, high-end financial services, PE/VC investments, capital markets, IP protection, and cross-border dispute resolution, etc. KWMIC was launched to best serve our clients and capture the historic opportunities arising from the Greater Bay Area.

In March 2019, we also established the BRCICF, as a comprehensive professional service platform combining legal services, think tank studies, consultation services, and international cooperation. It has been established to connect the government and enterprises, and to provide high-level professional services to both Chinese and foreign participators who explore the opportunity brought by the Belt & Road Initiative.

KWM has been engaged in a great number of Belt & Road projects for the last a few years, gaining extensive practical experiences covering all types of cross-border projects across various Belt & Road countries and industries, such as energy, transport, infrastructure, manufacturing, finance, etc.

What does innovation mean to you and how can firms be better at it?

Innovation is a mindset, it should not be limited to technical as such. For us, innovation means less mental restriction on what we do and find solutions, means always dare to tackle into new areas. Over the years, we have done numerous ‘firsts’ in the Chinese legal industry, including adapting western law firm compensation and management systems and IT infrastructure, expanding into new areas of practices and sectors, etc.

Being innovative also means we are always willing to look into new solutions for our clients. KWM is constantly thinking differently and redefining what is possible to enable us to deliver exceptional business outcomes and service to our clients. Wang Junfeng, our Global Chairman, and our management, have been keeping open-minded and paying attention to innovation to promote the firm’s development. The innovative mindset has been rooted in our strategy and development as well as in our management and our people.

The combination between legacy King & Wood and legacy Mallesons Stephen Jaques was an historical event in the world legal history where the first time a Chinese law firm and an established Western firm with long history merged, making the first global law firm headquartered in Asia. The firm took many innovative initiatives to accelerate the integration of two cultures and systems.

What are the biggest challenges facing you in China?

The challenges we are facing mainly relate to how to ensure the firm maintain the same pace of rapid development and continue to lead the market. We also need to ensure continuity of same quality client service across the firm, as well as constantly improve the level of globalisation and management level.

What are the biggest trends facing your practice?

Globalisation of Chinese legal services has become the biggest trends, alongside which is increasingly deeper competition in the local market. Chinese law firms are rapidly maturing and entering the international legal market competition.

What do you think are the top things most clients want and why?

  • Understand clients’ businesses and their commercial goals behind the business decisions and align with it;
  • Quick response;
  • Deliver high quality and comprehensive service; and
  • Value-add service

Is technology changing the way you interact with your clients, and the services you can provide them?

Modern technology has changed the ways of interaction between lawyers and clients. Through mobile applications and other means, it has become much easier and efficient for communication. As a result, new ways of client interaction and maintenance at personal level become possible and easier.

Technology in data collection enables lawyer to access more information so that lawyers can provide the client with value-add additional services and products through data analytics. We can foresee technology will make more changes to the way of interaction between the legal counsel and their clients which will further change the way of providing services.

What have you found is the best way to retain talent – both at partner and associate levels?

KWM always regards talent retention and cultivation as one of our primary development strategies. To keep our competitive advantage in the highly competitive legal market, we take people-oriented approach in all areas of management, firm culture, humanistic care, training and career development, and build a multi-dimensional system around it. This covers from interns to associates of all levels and partners.

We consider that the best way to retain talents is to provide a good platform and support them to develop and become successful. Based on this approach,KWM was elected as one of the China’s Most Attractive Employers 2018 by Universum for the third consecutive year.

Since becoming managing partner what’s surprised you most about running a firm?

Chinese law firms have experienced phenomenal rapid growth for 30 years, it has always been a challenge to get involved in management keeping up with the growth. I am very lucky that I can work with a group of highly talented and devoted partners in the management, who are diligent and conscientious on driving business forward, and dedicated to the firm and strive for perfection.

Our global chairman, Wang Junfeng, has been the driven force behind all of our developments, with his entrepreneur spirit, long-term vision, innovative thinking and the courage.

We also have a very dedicated operational team to support the implementation of management decisions.

Going forward and with further growth of the firm, we will definitely face more challenges in law firm management, we must continue to improve ourselves and management styles and learn in order to keep up with the development.

How has your involvement in client-facing work changed since becoming managing partner?

My responsibility requires me to focus more on the management and maintenance of the clients from the overall consideration of the firm, including setting up strategy and structure for the firm’s client management system as well as oversee its implementation. I also need to look into internal resource coordination among practice groups, regions, etc. from the business strategy level of the firm.

What advice would you give to the next generation of partners ready to rise the ranks?

Stay hungry, stay foolish; become a master of your area, while broader your horizon with wider range of knowledge; gain transboundary experience and commercial sense, understand the market and the client, and with a view on the big picture.

What are your firm’s policies on diversity and inclusion?

We encourage a diversified corporate culture from the establishment of the firm and we always keep an open policy on nationality, culture background, gender and so on. In our firm, people from many countries work together closely, and female staff members have always been a key part of our community. Currently, 34% of our partners are female and 57% of associates are female.

Exchanging places

My route into law started with a training contract in 1994. Before then, I completed a postgraduate degree and taught at a university for a few years. I decided to go into practice because academia wasn’t as interesting or rewarding as I thought it would be and even then, the system seemed to be offering students less and less and charging them more and more.

I decided to qualify as a solicitor for a few reasons. One of them was definitely money. I was a bit older than most trainees and I had more commitments. I wanted the security of a job with a monthly salary. Things are much better at the Bar now for new entrants and I wouldn’t want anyone reading this to be discouraged by the way things were 25 years ago. The other reason was that I was initially attracted by the idea of doing transactional corporate and restructuring work and didn’t see myself as a litigator.

I spent the first half of my career at what is now DLA Piper in the restructuring team. There was a mixed caseload of contentious and non-contentious work and I found litigation more enjoyable than the transactional work. I spent the last few years as a partner at a large firm doing contentious fraud insolvency work for HMRC and insolvency practitioners. I enjoyed the fee earning work and dealing with clients, but realised that I didn’t enjoy the ‘running the business’ side of partnership, and I wasn’t particularly good at it either.

I decided to make the change to the Bar to allow me to spend more time doing what I enjoy and to get away from financial management and supervising a team. I had been thinking about it for a few years before I made the move in 2014, and that’s the only regret I have – I should have done it earlier.

Transferring to the Bar was surprisingly easy. If you have higher rights, which I did, you’ll normally be excused pupillage and have to do six qualifying sessions, which you can complete after you’ve been called. You can be called to the Bar without it affecting your status as a solicitor – you don’t have to resign from your firm or give up your practising certificate.

When I made my move, I was looking for a chambers which had experience of solicitors transferring to the Bar. I already knew the clerks and many of the members of the commercial team at Exchange because I had been instructing them for years as a solicitor. I knew that other former solicitors had moved there and built very successful practices.

The other members and the chambers management were incredibly supportive to me when I joined. I wasn’t required to do pupillage but chambers arranged for me to spend some time following some of the more senior members around. It was really useful to me and reassured me that I had made the right decision.

Some of my initial practice at the Bar came from former colleagues. I was also lucky enough to have some former clients steer work to me from solicitors I didn’t know well. The clerking and management team at Exchange have superb contacts and have been able to put me forward for work which suits me.

During my time at Exchange, I’ve experienced the huge differences between partnership in a large firm and practice at the Bar. The Bar offers a combination of more flexibility and freedom at the price of far less certainty about what you’ll be doing at any given time. There’s a greater variety of work at the Bar. You don’t have the opportunity to work closely with the same people all the time, and you don’t have a team of solicitors to whom you can delegate work.

To anyone thinking about transferring, the first thing I’d recommend is getting hold of some books on advocacy and cross-examination techniques. If you spend some time understanding techniques for preparation and appearing in court, you’ll probably overcome some of your fears and at the same time understand whether it’s the sort of work you’ll enjoy.

The other thing to do is to ask yourself what you enjoy most about being a lawyer. If it’s the client contact, working in or managing a large team, and (if you’re fairly senior) having a fair degree of control over what you’re doing and when, then the Bar might not be right for you. If it’s doing the law, and if you enjoy the challenge of taking on something complicated at short notice and making it make sense, you’ll love the Bar.

Making a successful transition

For many years there has been talk about the amalgamation of the solicitors’ and barristers’ professions; a fused profession, a one-stop shop, and so on. It seems to have gone quiet at the moment, but maybe that’s because it’s happening stealthily! Some of our most successful barristers (over 10%) are former solicitors, and it’s fascinating to see how they use a wide range of skills to achieve their success.

Of course, there are reservations. Not all of our solicitor acquisitions have enjoyed the change as much as they hoped, because it really is a transformation of working practices for most solicitors. Barristers are self-employed, with all the risks and benefits attached, and we eat what we kill. Although our chambers, which is one of the largest in the country, is very corporate, and is managed to help all our members to achieve maximum success, it remains the case that, the harder you work, the more commitment you show, and the more you provide a top class service, the better you will do.

For us, there are many benefits in taking on solicitors who have a real and mature aspiration to come to the Bar. First, it may give us a better than average chance of recruiting a barrister who will be a great success. Second, it brings a wider pool of knowledge and experience into our area of work. Because we are a service business, we constantly ask: what do our solicitor clients want from us, and what do they value? Former solicitors will have some insight into that vital question.

When we discuss with solicitor applicants their desire to join us, the first thing we want to establish is that they really do understand the difference between being an employed solicitor and a self-employed barrister. Also that, whatever their seniority, they will inevitably be starting from the bottom and working their way up (we give them the choice of appearing on our list by date of admission, to reflect their seniority as a solicitor, or date of call – which may reduce their financial commitment to chambers in the early days).

With all new recruits, solicitor or barrister, we establish at the outset a clear plan of management, including lists of solicitors whom they would like us to help them to contact and encourage. Of course, that has to be done by the recruit, as well as by chambers, and so building worthwhile relationships (internally as well as externally) is hugely important. We review all our barristers at regular intervals, agreed in advance, and we use that as an opportunity to share views both ways; are they achieving what they and we want, and are we living up to their expectations.

Generally, we find that solicitor recruits appreciate the fact that we’re run as a business, like most solicitor firms, and that we have a business governance structure. Also, we have a huge advantage in this area of recruitment in that our deputy chief executive, Jonathan I’Anson, is a former partner in a significant commercial firm of solicitors.

James Segerdahl: Price is a poor proxy for quality or value

How is technology changing the way you meet client needs? Which areas will be most affected by new tech?

We have sought to be very proactive in utilising technology to meet client needs because it is a key vehicle for delivery of value to clients. Much of the focus in the business of law is rightfully on the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) and blockchain.

Like many firms, we are using and developing AI technologies to automate repetitive tasks, such as document review and management, to complete work faster and reduce the risk of error. At the same time, blockchain solutions are coming online to replace traditional ledger-based tasks like security ownership, real estate titles, etc., while also creating self-effecting ‘smart contracts’.

Building on our pioneering experience as an early leader in e-Discovery Analysis and Technology (e-DAT), we continue to be at the forefront of technological development including, for example, our role as a co-developer with a leading global technology provider of its recently-launched, industry-wide interconnected platform that combines knowledge management, project management, price modelling, billing data, and matter mapping capability. We also have invested in our own internal, private, and permissioned blockchain, placing us among the first firms to begin implementing the technology, which we will expand and leverage across our globally integrated platform.

How do you differentiate your offering in an increasingly crowded and competitive market?

We do what we do best. We focus on our clients in everything we do. We are a highly integrated and collaborative global law firm with a multi-disciplinary client focus built to deliver solutions and results that clients need in order to grow, manage, and protect their businesses.

We serve clients in a variety of industry sectors, with particular profile in energy, financial services, healthcare, manufacturing and industrial, and technology. Our practice and geographic reach is extraordinary in its focus on seamless service, solutions, results and delivery of value.

What innovation have you introduced that has added the most value?

For us, innovation extends far beyond technology. We find that the most valuable asset is our culture of supporting innovation. Our client-focused teams include human-centred design practitioners who help us better understand our client service needs to develop and deliver creative, cost-effective, real world solutions. Our team also includes certified change management specialists who work alongside our clients and lawyers to drive innovation and continuous improvement.

These tech-savvy professionals work hand-in-hand with our lawyers and clients, using legal project management and process improvement techniques to address all facets of our service delivery and operations. Through this partnership with our clients, we have elevated the way we collaborate, escalated the speed at which we can develop and deliver solutions, and enhanced the security of valuable legal platforms and data.

To promote adoption of our innovative solutions over the past couple of years, we have featured a hands-on and interactive line-up of new and emerging technologies, products, and ideas at our global partner retreat, all designed to add value to clients in the course of our delivery of legal services. We call it the ‘Avenue of Innovation’. Our partners love it. It has been an extraordinarily valuable and engaging way to pilot, educate, and develop best practices for the benefit of clients. It helps meet the threshold challenge – firm-wide education about the resources that our firm, and the fertile minds across our platform, have in the works and in practical use that are available to enhance and improve our service to our clients.

What have been the main changes in the way you charge for your work in recent years? What percentage of work is charged out with alternatives to the billable hour?

In many markets, the billable hour as a foundational piece of the billing approach is far from dead – many clients prefer the familiarity and straightforward manner of this form of pricing, at least as a base. Having said that, there are some parts of the globe where the billable hour is on its last leg, if not yet deceased.

In all markets, alternative fee arrangements are here to stay, and will only increase on a percentage basis as time goes on. We don’t try to break down the percentage in any precise way; there is too much overlap these days for that statistic to be particularly meaningful. We believe it is in our interest, and in our client’s interest, to be open and creative regarding pricing strategies that can be mutually beneficial. This means our lawyers have to get better at legal project management through a culture of continuous improvement. For that reason, we have invested in education and training in that discipline, and this pays off for both the law firm and the client, and is increasingly a skillset that clients expect to see from their law firm.

The rise of legal operations has increased law firms’ focus on metrics and data – which metrics are clients most focused on now?

Clients are increasingly recognising that pricing of legal services is a poor proxy for quality and even less of a proxy for value. They need to justify their outside counsel spend relative to their budget and the value that the client receives from that work. The actual metrics can vary by clients, who often have an internal scorecard that compares their internal ratings of complexity and risk or value.

We are often asked how efficiently we are managing the work (e.g. days a file is open and number of timekeepers involved), the appropriateness of our staffing as compared to the client’s perceived complexity (e.g. leverage), and what other services/value we offer (e.g. CLE programmes).

Finally, we also see an increasing focus on objectively measuring diversity – not just our percentage of lawyers or partners, etc., but more granular evaluation of the diversity of our client service team makeup, in terms of either hours or fees as a percentage of our firm’s total for that client. Here, as in all other aspects, the key for us is working with our clients to understand what business drivers are critical for them and how we can help deliver our service, and monitor our own performance along the way, to help the client achieve its quantitative benchmarks.

Robert Brodrick: Innovation from a different perspective

What made you want to become the new chair of Payne Hicks Beach and what do you hope to achieve?

It is a great honour to be responsible for a firm that has been around for almost 300 years. The private client landscape has altered dramatically in the last 25 years with an explosion of private wealth, and at the same time, the firm has evolved.

We continue to provide top-class private client and family advice as well as property, dispute resolution, employment, and corporate. However, we now provide new services such as reputation management and citizenship and immigration advice as well. My job as chair is to make sure we do everything to service the needs of ultra-high-net-worth (UHNW) clients and to attract the best practitioners to so that we can continue to attract the best clients.

How will your role/involvement in client-facing work change upon becoming chair?

I will be supported by Dominic Crossley (head of dispute resolution) and Jonathan Gatward (head of corporate) on our new management board, and we have an experienced director of management, Virginia Farquharson, who has run the firm for several years, so it will be business as usual for my clients.

What’s changes do you hope to make in the firm that will benefit clients?

I want to focus on excellence and client service. We are not planning any drastic changes.

What does Payne Hicks Beach do differently from its competitors?

We’ve been in the business of looking after clients for almost 300 years so we understand the concept of long-term client relationships – I think that is what we do best.

What does innovation mean to Payne Hicks Beach? How can firms generally be better at innovation?

For Payne Hicks Beach innovation is about responding to clients’ needs – too often firms look at everything from their own perspective. When you are dealing with families and individuals you have to put yourself into their shoes.

Is technology changing the way the firm interacts with clients and the services it provides them?

Yes – the way in which we work since the advent of email has completely changed the solicitor’s job, and that has a knock on effect for support services, such as secretaries and IT. We can now provide electronic access to documents which not only applies to commercial clients but also to traditional landed estates who, for the first time, have access to documents that would previously have been confined to a strong room.

What do you think are the top three things your clients want and why?

Empathy, expertise, and good value for money. These are all essential if you are to develop a long-term relationship with your clients and be able to add value.

What are the specific challenges of working for UHNW individuals as opposed to high-profile corporate entities?

Individuals are not answerable to shareholders or a board – they are able to make irrational or emotional decisions which can make advising them challenging as well as deeply rewarding because of the direct impact advice will have. This is why empathy is particularly important.

What are the biggest challenges facing firms of your size and specialty in the UK?

The ever increasing complexity of tax legislation is particularly challenging for the private client practitioner. The regulatory environment has also become more demanding.

What specific trends are you seeing in the legal services market?

It is always challenging to recruit good candidates and we are constantly on the lookout.

How does the firm retain talent in an increasingly competitive marketplace?

The quality of the work (and the clients) is a major incentive, as is the opportunity to work with some of the country’s leading lawyers in a collegiate and collaborative culture.

What do you look for in a lawyer wanting to make partner?

As well as technical expertise, I am looking for someone who is commercially astute and is able to generate work either from existing clients or by attracting new clients.

What are your firm’s policies on diversity and inclusion, as well as wellbeing?

We are committed to providing equal opportunities and the firm ensures that everyone is equally valued, respected, and treated with dignity and fairness. We have regular training on diversity and inclusion. We have also adopted an agile working policy to assist members of the firm to work from home.

What has been your greatest achievement, both in a professional and personal capability, to date?

Moving to Payne Hicks Beach in 2012 with my clients and followed by a small team of solicitors and trust managers from my previous firm was not only an achievement but also one of my best decisions.

Manuel Galicia R: The process of institutionalisation

How would you define your firm’s culture? How important is firm culture to you?

Our firm’s culture is based on (i) collaboration and respect in order to offer the best possible multidisciplinary service in the market; (ii) helping our clients to make business happen and to make better business decisions; and (iii) assuring the best and constant development of our members, clients, and that of our society.

What’s the main change you’ve made in the firm that will benefit clients?

The institutionalisation process of our firm to assure that our clients receive advice from the most qualified and specialised professionals within the firm. More recently, in the past year we created a new area in the firm responsible for innovation and within its responsibilities, this area has established a project management process to achieve a more efficient service for our clients.

What does innovation mean to you and how can firms be better at it?

For us, innovation is any new procedure, process or structure developed by our teams to implement a transaction or to develop a product in order to provide a better and more efficient service to our clients. In this respect, technology becomes a tool, however, creating a culture within the firm that results in trained lawyers incentivised to innovate is even more important.

Is technology changing the way you interact with your clients, and the services you can provide them?

It is starting to impact for purposes of cybersecurity (financial sector) and payment processes; but it will accelerate its impact in the years to come. We therefore need to create a more technological environment to create and incentivise a culture that focus more on innovation and technology.

What are the biggest challenges facing firms of your size in Mexico?

Becoming more institutionalised and consequently more strategical ready to adapt to the new challenges our market is presenting and avoiding internal competition.

What are the top things most clients want and why?

  • More knowledge of their business and closer collaboration with their GCs;
  • Lawyers that resolve problems, but not only legal problems;
  • More creativity on fee arrangements;
  • Innovation

What have you found is the best way to retain talent – both at partner and associate levels?

Assuring that our talent is convinced that the firm: (i) is committed to their professional and personal development; (ii) assigns responsibilities to our associates; and (iii) provides them the opportunity of working in projects that have a certain purpose aligned with their motivations.

The foregoing is supported by having a career plan, through constant feedback and by establishing coaching and training programmes aimed to develop their professional and soft skills.

Organisations like ours need to create the platform that will allow people to develop themselves at their maximum level and thereby permitting them to make better and larger contributions to the firm, our clients, and our country.

Since becoming managing partner what’s surprised you most about running a firm?

The challenge of being a good leader by learning to better listening and communicating to our partners and teams; as well as convincing partners to look to their firm as a business and act accordingly.

How has your role/involvement in client-facing work changed since becoming managing partner?

The compensation committee has set forth my objectives which relate more to institutionalising the clients’ relationship, focus on strategy, and on positioning the firm in the international markets, as well as participating together with other partners in those transactions where my participation could contribute some value.

Clients understand that my partners will be the ones performing the work and that my role is more strategic but that I will intervene as requested and needed.

What advice would you give to the next generation of partners ready to rise the ranks?

Devote 10% of your time to learning about your client’s business and to develop a closer relationship; get the support of the firm’s BD area and share your information with those areas; support the leaders of the firm and become one of them in due course.

Do your job with passion and enjoyment; protect and live our values and culture; develop the capability of listening to our partners; assure that we hire people based on their potential; and continue focusing on the development of both professional and soft skills of the firm’s members.

Finally, trust our business model and measure performance.

What are your firm’s policies on diversity and inclusion?

The creation and implementation of a sustainability plan is a fundamental part of the process of institutionalisation of our law firm. Currently our main axes of social responsibility are diversity and inclusion policies, individual participations with the community, a pro bono programme, teaching, collaborations in forums, inclusion policies, and good working conditions, among others.

In order to achieve this goal, we are now in the process of integrating our projects into a single platform that allows us to position ourselves nationally and internationally, strengthen a culture of global social responsibility and, by the end of this year, join the UN Global Compact.

Kristof Roox and Thomas De Meese: Managing partners shouldn’t hide behind their role

How would you define your firm’s culture?

Our firm was founded in the US in 1979 by a group of lawyers, staff, and clients who left a large corporate firm because they believed in doing things differently. Four decades later, this belief is still a cornerstone of the firm’s culture. Our Brussels office was started in 1999, and has become a family within the family, where staff and attorneys work together in a cohesive, collaborative way. We find that it results in smart, down-to-earth professionals who embrace the challenge of practicing sophisticated, complex law.

Our professionals value having a life outside of work and always treat clients the way they themselves would like to be treated. It should therefore come as no surprise that Crowell & Moring takes great pride in the fact that when new lawyers in any Crowell & Moring office are asked why they joined the firm, the people and the culture are always among the top reasons.

What’s the main change you’ve made in the firm in the past few years that will benefit clients?

Our legal project management programme (LPM) is much more than a necessary response to expanding business risks and shrinking legal-services budgets. It is a framework for providing top-notch legal counsel and litigation services in a manner that ensures predictability, accountability and efficiency. We have developed a suite of in-house LPM tools and mandated their use for certain types of clients and engagements.

Legal project management is not a new development at Crowell & Moring, and many LPM processes and best practices have been in use at the firm for years. What distinguishes our LPM programme today is the creation and implementation of our linked, proprietary tools: Matter Planning and Matter Management.

Our Matter Planning tool is the foundation of our LPM system. Developed in tandem with our in-house information technology department and legal practice leaders, Matter Planning features the ability to create a budget or to use a suite of customisable templates that enable the input of key engagement data: statement of work (desired legal outcome(s) from the client’s perspective, key assumptions to develop the budget, what’s in scope and out-of-scope, constraints and risks), timekeeper resources, and various pricing scenarios to develop realistic budgets based on the particular facts and circumstances of each matter.

Matter Management is a flexible, intuitive tool that enables input, review, analysis and reporting of legal project data. Our IT department worked closely with firm partners, counsel, associates, and paralegals to identify the information that is most important in helping them manage and complete even the most complex client projects. Client input and feedback is equally important, and we spoke to a number of in-house counsel to better understand and incorporate their information requirements.

Our Matter Management system enables our lawyers and paralegals to monitor actual hours and time-value progress against budgeted amounts and milestones. We are able to update and track tasks and deliverables by person responsible, add important dates to a shared calendar and set upcoming alerts, maintain discussions between team members and project participants, log open issues and track them to resolution, and produce effective, understandable reports.

When a project or matter is concluded, it is not yet complete. Matter Management further enables us to track lessons learned and conduct post-mortem analyses so that we can improve our processes and develop additional best practices that reduce client risk and improve satisfaction.

When our clients succeed, we succeed. LPM helps us achieve this common goal.

What are the biggest challenges facing firms of your size in Belgium?

For a law firm of the size of our Belgian office, the challenges lie in growth and in establishing the processes needed to accompany this growth whilst remaining agile. Most firms, and companies, face an uphill battle once they hit a certain size. The struggle is about taking the next step towards becoming a mid-sized law firm in Belgium and finding the people with the right attitude to join. And once they’ve joined, the struggle consists in setting up processes and procedures to uphold the required professional level, without jeopardising the present agile culture.

What have you found is the best way to retain talented partners and associates?

The most important factor in retaining people – whether associates, partners, or staff – is ‘firm culture’. Excellent coaching, exciting matters, great client encounters and high tech are almost a given these days. What you want to strive for (and what we have established) is an open culture in which every individual can thrive and be a member of several multi-purpose teams. Also, the current generation wants to be involved in (the organisation of) the firm. We incite people to take initiative, to come with new ideas and to, collaboratively, realise as much as possible. It’s because of this undefined ‘firm culture’ that people want to stay aboard.

What are your firm’s policies on diversity and inclusion?

Diversity is, for us, about creating a culture of inclusion. We are a multinational firm that embraces different backgrounds, ideas, traditions, and perspectives. In January 2019, we were part of the launch of the Brussels-based Legal Diversity & Inclusion Alliance (LDIA) of which we are a founding member. We are committed to creating a workplace where there is no room for discrimination or prejudice.

At Crowell & Moring, people are recognised for their unique talents, backgrounds, and perspectives. Our commitment to diversity and inclusion takes the form of a pledge to eliminate discrimination in the workplace, to promote an inclusive organisational culture, and to take tangible actions to fulfil our mission. We strongly believe that combining our efforts will greatly aid our progress towards achieving these goals.

In 2017, Crowell & Moring provided unconscious bias training for those in leadership positions, including the management board, practice group leaders, the lawyer development and recruiting committees, and senior staff members. We also hosted the firm’s inaugural Diversity & Inclusion Retreat, which brought together more than 70 of the firm’s LGBTQ+ attorneys and attorneys of colour for two days of business, professional, and networking development opportunities. In the spirit of continued dialogue, we also worked with external consultants to create diversity dialogues, in which almost 300 lawyers and staff participated in small group discussions, designed to be a safe forum for exploring how current events and other external issues affect internal firm dynamics.

In 2018, the firm launched Sponsorship 2.0 – Yearly Cohort, building on our foundation of sponsorship (original pilot in 2012). We have collaborated with an external consultant to create an opportunity for 36 of our lawyers – associates, counsel, and partners – to participate in sponsorship circles, including workshops and informal gatherings, over six months in 2018. Circles focus on inclusivity of women and diverse lawyers, consisting of two sponsors (partners) and two protégés (mid-level associate or counsel) that are strong performers, from a broad range of practice areas and geographic locations. We have also committed to abide by the Mansfield Rule, as part of the Diversity Lab’s Mansfield Rule 2.0 initiative, which will further drive our efforts to ensure that we have diverse individuals under consideration for firm leadership positions, in lateral recruiting, and for promotions.

More recently, Chambers Associate ranked Crowell & Moring fifth for ‘Best Firms for Diversity’ in its 2018 survey (among 40 leading firms); Law360 ranked Crowell & Moring fifth in its 2018 Diversity Snapshot for ‘Best Law Firms for Minority Attorneys’ in the 300–599 lawyers category; and Vault ranked Crowell & Moring 12th in its 2019 Associate Survey for ‘Overall Diversity,’ ‘Diversity for Minorities,’ and ‘Diversity for Women’ and 11th for ‘Diversity for LGBT Individuals’.

How can law firms best encourage innovation?

By embracing innovation in our culture and by listening to what clients want. Innovation at Crowell is about encouraging everyone to share their ideas and about working together across all levels contributing to the spirit of innovation with the goal of doing great work for our clients even better than before. It’s about aligning our business with our clients’ businesses. And it’s about embracing technology, which goes back to culture.

Is technology changing the way you interact with your clients, and the services you can provide them?

Absolutely. Technology is a game changer for the HOW we interact with clients and HOW we can provide services to them. But technology is not about the WHY. This quote sums it up very well: ‘Technology will never replace the comfort, trust, and human connection clients may get from knowing their lawyer is looking out for them and has their back.’ And even with technology, clients will want a trusted relationship, but preferably with someone who is tech-knowledgeable.

Differentiation is critical to buyers of legal services – how do you stand apart from the rest of the market?

At first, we would have said ‘culture’ but we know it’s very difficult to explain. There are of course other differentiators and amongst the most common ‘modern ones’ we go for the depth-of-expertise combined with a significant investment in the understanding of our clients business, and a no-nonsense pragmatic approach. We add on top of that culture and innovative service delivery models where applicable. A combination of those will help us to stand out.

What do you think are the top three things most clients want and why?

In our experience, this depends enormously on when, where, who, and how you ask this question. Maybe you can generate a top three for a certain sub-geographic market but even then you will find striking differences between positions, sectors, specific preoccupations, and locations.

Based on our experience, in our market, and combined with market research, we can state that the top three things clients want is (not necessarily in this order): level of service (responsiveness, interaction, personal touch), quality of work (although that is a given), and efficiency.

How have your roles/involvement in client-facing work changed since becoming managing partners?

It’s common knowledge that being a managing partner of a law firm brings about challenges. It can be difficult to balance all the different responsibilities required for the smooth running of the business. For this balance to work, a solid team of attorneys is a prerequisite. The strength of both our IP and competition departments is what makes it work. Kristof was sole managing partner of the Brussels office for five years. In April 2017, Thomas joined him as co-managing partner, and their reliable tandem has given Kristof some breathing space and has capably steered the Brussels office ever since.

In conclusion, the managing partner role did not change our involvement in our legal practice. We are still on top of things, develop strategies, review briefs and plead cases. The leg work, however, is done by a committed team. The MP role forces us to staff and manage better which is beneficial for the respective teams and the Brussels office. The MP role should also not be overestimated. Very often, MPs get side tracked and lose sight of their practices/clients and hide behind the management role. We try to avoid this at all costs.

Client Service Awards – What clients really want

Stewarts, Mishcon de Reya, and Weil, Gotshal & Manges have emerged among the top-performing law firms for client service in the UK, according to brand new Legal 500 research assessing what clients really think about their external advisers.

The trio are among a host of leading US and UK firms to have been recognised by our new research project, which is the culmination of one of the most comprehensive surveys of law firm clients ever.

Thousands of clients contributed feedback last autumn on the firms they work with in the UK, rating firms on a range of criteria – including billing practices, team quality, industry knowledge and consistency of service – on a scale from ‘not good’ to ‘exceptional’.

The process collected more than 200,000 scores, which we have used to create a list of the top performers in five categories: major US firms in London; UK top 25 firms; UK large firms; UK mid-size; and the global elite, which is defined by sister publication Legal Business as firms with revenue of at least £500m and average profits per equity partner of at least £1m.

The scores of all firms within these groupings were then combined to create an overall list of the top ten firms for client service delivery in the UK.

At a time when the client is increasingly king, the results provide a clear indication of the firms setting the pace in the eyes of those using their services.

Firms with a distinct focus score well, with disputes specialist Stewarts and disputes and private client focused Mishcons, private client and media firm Harbottle & Lewis and insurance leader Kennedys all sitting within the overall top ten.

Commenting on the findings, Stewarts managing partner John Cahill says: ‘We are a litigation-only practice. Our clients are often faced with high-value and high-stakes disputes, and they value expertise, experience and judgement on litigation and – to an extent – on wider strategic issues.’

‘When you’re neither the biggest nor the smallest, differentiation is very important,’ adds Mishcons partner and business development director Elliot Moss on the firm’s USP.

With Kirkland & Ellis and Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton joining Weil in the overall top ten chart, US firms’ City arms also put in a strong performance.

Weil London head Mike Francies believes that, despite some US firms’ growing scale in the City, the fact most are not trying to be all things to all people can serve as a competitive advantage. In addition, he argues that US firms have traditionally been more focused on the client than some UK firms.

‘The US model has always been very focused on clients,’ he says. ‘Big UK firms are sometimes building more of an accounting model – “here’s the brand and you can rely on it”. It’s more about the firm than the client.

‘Another possible aspect when you look at US firms in London is that, by definition, every time we get a lateral we’re benefiting from the hire of someone ambitious who thinks they can build a practice and is no longer doing that at their UK firm.’

Other highly-rated firms across the tables include Shearman & Sterling, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, Slaughter and May, Linklaters, and Hogan Lovells in the global elite grouping, and Fieldfisher, Taylor Wessing, and Irwin Mitchell in the UK top 25.

Looking broadly at what makes good client service, irrespective of firm size or location, Mishcons’ Moss stresses the need for a personal service and continued involvement, even when matters have finished.

‘Clients want genuine ownership of the relationship by the partner and the team. When firms get bigger, people may think it’s just an institutional relationship, but clients still really want personal care. They also want dialogue in between matters. Lawyers must not disappear because their transaction has ended.

‘They also want lawyers who understand the context in which they’re delivering their advice – the things you’re not taught in law school are really important,’ he adds.

Others, such as Cahill at Stewarts, stress the importance of firms genuinely listening to their clients and understanding the service they need – rather than what the firm wants to offer.

Price in and of itself is not the most important factor. What is more important is that clients believe they are receiving value for money – and indeed added value – from their advisers and that firms are being as efficient as possible, whether that is by using new technology, alternative delivery centres or through other forms of innovation.

According to partners, clients increasingly want firms to be doing all of the above while also meeting expectations to improve on both diversity and ethical awareness.

Linklaters corporate partner Jessamy Gallagher says: ‘The whole industry needs to keep working hard on diversity, inclusion and social mobility. While some big strides have been made in the last few years, this remains a long road to travel for many law firms.’

Fieldfisher managing partner Michael Chissick concludes: ‘Understanding the impact all organisations have on society and the environment is increasingly important. Our employees want to work for a responsible and caring firm and our clients want the same. Articulating the good you are doing and defining your purpose beyond profit can now make the difference between you and your competitors in recruiting the best people and winning the best clients.’

Never overlook the basics of client service

A law firm provides an array of services, ranging from consultancy to drafting of documents, to assistance in litigation, to name but a few. The reputation of a firm is deeply grounded in the quality of services it provides its clients. Many firms coach their partners on the notion of delivering excellence in client service, lest someone inadvertently overlook the basics. It seems therefore useful to summarise those suggestions as we at Eversheds Sutherland did in a recent partners’ meeting in London.

Management of client expectations is crucial. One basic tip is to advise clients in advance if you are not going to be available, so they are not surprised by your ‘out of office’ reply if on a deal or involved in an urgent issue. We are all familiar with pressure caused by client needs and this may help to mitigate it.

A further valid suggestion is to ask clients and learn how they like to work, along with when and how best to communicate: for instance, if your contact person always travels home at 7pm that may be a great time for a catch-up call.

Giving clients a team sheet and escalation procedure, and if a client does not set a deadline asking what they envisage may be a useful tool to avoid unwelcome surprises and disappointment due to longer than anticipated response time.

In today’s business climate, clients expect solutions that are practical and technically faultless. To achieve this it is vital to work closely with the client partners and account teams to stay joined up and better understand their needs. Having a thorough knowledge of the client and the sectors they operate in is also invaluable in addressing clients’ requirements.

It is recommendable to plan some time away from calls and inbox management to get through critical client work, especially that of drafting complex legal opinions or statements of defence, when maximum concentration is vital.

In terms of efficiency, doing what needs to be done once and well makes things easier and more productive for you and facilitates cost control.

Also, getting to know the technology, specialist assistance, and other solutions that the Big Law firms routinely have in place, provides help in getting the job done.

Always opt for solutions whereby you can achieve multiple objectives with one action: e.g. work from a client’s office, or join in a CSR activity with a client.

Using common sense aimed at finding an easier, clearly better solution is always a sound suggestion.

In managing teamwork, diarise deadlines for relevant team members who contribute to a certain piece of work, also think globally about how you set up teams, resource client service teams and matters. And if something does not work properly, tell someone and suggest what can be done.

When you have important things to do out of the office – this includes birthdays, attending a parents’ night or important social occasions – do explain and ask for help from colleagues or plan your day to manage expectations.

Regular interaction through in-person meetings will deepen client relationships and improve the overall experience.

It is always strongly advisable to look for solutions and ideas and be clear about what you need and expect and treat internal team and group members like a client when delivering work internally; respect other team members’ needs to profitably get on with work and speak with internal members of the firm in person wherever possible, are basic but helpful pointers.

As a final point, provide clear, succinct emails (both internal and external) with actions/key advice upfront. This is the crucial suggestion: clients are totally put off by long opinion letters full of case law references and jurisprudence.

Generally speaking, those who instruct a lawyer is required to take decisions in a short timeline, taking into account an amount of data and other factors, and do not have the time or patience to go through a lengthy, complex document, possibly written in legalese – they just want to know the best option and the relative risks and costs. All the rest is unnecessary and may be counter-productive.

Also in drafting defence briefs, being concise is always a winning choice. Judges spend a great part of their time reading legal briefs; thus it is easy to imagine how little they will appreciate long, verbose submissions.

Finally, requesting feedback from the client is useful for the purposes of honing performance – and it is also appreciated by clients.

All very simple advice, but it may be of use to review the various points from time to time.

Being your true self at work

Office Merger cover image

From Brunei to the UK, the inclusion of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT+) people in society has rarely been out of the news in recent months.

In April, Brunei introduced new legislation making sodomy an offence punishable by death, with lesbian sex now subject to corporal punishment and/or ten years imprisonment. In May, Kenya’s high court rejected an attempt to repeal colonial-era laws criminalising gay sex, a contrasting decision to judges in India who in 2018 decriminalised homosexual sex, as well as the Angolan parliament which recently repealed its anti-gay laws and declared it unlawful to discriminate against anyone on the basis of sexual orientation.

Also in May, Taiwan became the first country in Asia to legalise same-sex marriage, while, in the US, the Democrat-controlled House of Representatives recently passed the Equality Act, a bill that would protect LGBT+ people from discrimination in housing, the workplace, and public accommodations. However, it will likely face opposition in the Republican-controlled Senate.

Here in the UK, the teaching of same-sex relationships and transgender issues to primary school children has led to ongoing protests by parents in Birmingham and a debate over religious freedom and parental rights.

Changes in UK equality legislation, starting in 1967, have increasingly protected the rights of LGBT+ individuals, both in private and in the workplace. In January, the charity Stonewall published its annual Workplace Equality Index. Now in its fifteenth year, the index highlights the 100 most inclusive UK employers. Leading the 2019 list is international firm Pinsent Masons, followed by Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner in second, and Baker McKenzie in tenth.

Amy Ulliott: Historically, how have you embedded LGBT+ inclusion in your workplace?

Kate Fergusson: Pinsent Masons was the first law firm on the Stonewall Workplace Equality Index back in 2008 and we were ranked Employer of the Year in 2019, so this has been a real journey for us. Senior leadership has played a key part in enabling us to embed LGBT+ inclusion in to our workplace. Our senior partner is also our senior ally and we have a number of senior LGBT champions who also actively support our network group. This sends a very clear message to our people about the importance of creating an inclusive workplace. Ultimately, it is everyone’s responsibility within our organisation and it has to been seen as business as usual.

Daisy Reeves: Since BCLP’s UK LGBTQ* group formed 12 years ago, our mission has been to create an environment where our people feel able to be themselves at work, regardless of sexual orientation, gender identity or expression. We were delighted to be ranked as the second most inclusive workplace for LGBTQ* employees, cross-sector and cross-UK, in this year’s Stonewall Work Equality Index. We are also ranked by Stonewall as one of the ten ‘Top Trans Employers’ in the UK. One of the keys to the success of this has been the overt way in which the partnership, including the top level of management at BCLP, have actively, and vocally, made clear that the firm is LGBTQ*-inclusive.

It is also about collaboration with other firms, clients, and charities, for the greater good, to embed inclusivity. BCLP’s LGBTQ* group has a history of collaboration, encouraging ideas and innovation (but there is still a way to go!). For example, BCLP spearheaded the LGBTQ*-focused graduate recruitment initiatives ‘DiversCity’ (now in its eighth year and participated by 14 City law firms) and ‘Authenticity’ (across all sectors in the City). This year we brought together six leading employers to form ‘WAVE’, an LGBTQ* network offering a platform for the career progression of junior to mid-level professionals across industries. We also initiated a mentoring programme in partnership with the Law Society, seeing firms included in Stonewall’s ‘Top 100 Employers’ list mentor smaller, regional firms around their approach to LGBTQ* inclusion.

Beyond engaging and empowering members of our LGBTQ* community and focusing on talent attraction strategies, we have actively engaged our entire workforce around issues which really matter. As mentioned above, BCLP’s board and leadership are genuinely engaged around LGBTQ* inclusion. We regularly communicate with all staff (locally and globally) on LGBTQ* issues and we have taken steps to ensure that sexual orientation and gender identity considerations are hardwired through our policies and processes.

Harry Small: Baker McKenzie’s global position on LGBT+ equality is ‘We are not neutral’. We are proud to support all individuals, whatever their sexual orientation, gender identity, or expression, and have implemented measures to ensure they can succeed and fulfil their ambitions.

We believe that diversity within the firm makes us stronger and that all our people in all of our 78 offices deserve respect, equal protection in the workplace, support and freedom from mistreatment. No one should be put at a disadvantage professionally, financially, or socially, on the basis of who they are. We give practical effect to these policies by, amongst other things, ensuring that same-sex couples are treated the same way as opposite-sex couples for the purposes of pay and benefits.

The firm encourages our people to be conscious of all our differences, including those that cannot be seen, and requires them to act in a way that is respectful of such differences. All our people are expected to contribute to creating and maintaining an open and supportive working environment. Our LGBT+ diversity commitments are recognised as significant elements of our diversity commitments. All diversity commitments have equal priority and it is our policy to act accordingly.

Support of LGBT+ equality reflects our values, supports the firm strategy, demonstrates alignment with our clients, is critical to our ability to recruit and retain top talent, and is consistent with our commitments to equality and non-discrimination as outlined in our global diversity and inclusion policies and Code of Conduct; our participation in LGBT+ workplace equality indices; and our participation in the UN Global Compact.

AU: For those firms that haven’t given it much thought, what are the obvious benefits of being an openly LGBT+-friendly business?

KF: When everyone can be themselves at work, we benefit from a more productive and motivated workforce and it’s easier to attract and retain staff. A diverse team also means that we benefit from diversity of thought which often generates more creativity and innovation.

DR: Being LGBTQ* is, for the most part, invisible and choosing to be ‘out’ at work is, of course, a personal decision but studies show that, if someone feels they must self-edit and pretend to be someone they are not, it can significantly impact that person’s general enjoyment of workplace life and even have an impact on their mental health. It is also widely known that if you are not able to be ‘out’ at work (should you choose to be) you are 30% less productive and 76% more likely to leave your place of work within three years. So, from a personal and business point of view, being an inclusive employer is a win-win situation.

HS: Building a diverse workforce is the smart business thing to do. It is good business to reflect in our workforce the diversity and inclusivity of our clients, because our clients expect it. If we do not reflect the diversity of our clients when we approach them, they will not do business with us. Many clients committed to diversity and inclusion will not accept a workforce working on their matters composed predominantly of straight white men!

This attitude and policy helps recruitment, too. High-quality recruits, often the very best in the market, are attracted to join us with our public stance on supporting LGBT+ and other people’s rights to fair treatment, always in the workplace and outside it wherever we can.

And lastly, we are not neutral in respect of LGBT+ issues because to be not neutral is the right thing to be!

AU: What has the firm done this past year to better foster an inclusive environment for LGBT+ staff and clients?

KF: A few highlights include: (i) rolling out trans inclusion training aimed at different teams within our business. This is helping to raise awareness and understanding of issues around gender identity/expression and create a forum where people can ask questions and learn how to create an inclusive workplace; (ii) we have run an LGBT+ Network Conference event, so that LGBT+ staff members and allies across our business can come together to share ideas, be inspired by some great guest speakers and help develop our network business plan for the next 12 months; and (iii) we have encouraged collaboration between network groups. For example, our Family Support Network and LGBT+ Network have run events to help parents/carers learn how to talk to their children about sexual orientation, gender identity, and modern families.

DR: Actively promoting LGBTQ* inclusion throughout BCLP, not just in the UK but globally, has been critical in maintaining momentum and creating opportunities for our people to learn more about the LGBTQ* community. Over the last year, in addition to the activities listed above and celebrating key dates in the LGBTQ* calendar, we have planned a broad range of events for LGBTQ* colleagues and their allies, ranging from educational sessions on important topics such as religion and trans issues through to our celebratory Pride Party each July and a Christmas Allies event, this year featuring the London Gay Men’s Chorus. We regularly share best practice with clients on LGBTQ* issues and we have learnt a lot along the way ourselves through doing so!

HS: We have had lots to be proud of when it comes to LGBT+ equality in the past year: For the third consecutive year we were named one of Stonewall’s Top Global Employers on their Workplace Equality Index; we have an active Global LGBT+ Business Resource Group, which actively monitors each office’s compliance with our safe spaces and LGBT+ inclusion policy; we joined Out Leadership – a global LGBT+ business network that helps out leaders and organisations realize the economic growth and talent dividend derived from inclusive business.

In every global business sector, Out Leadership has been instrumental in making LGBT+ equality a priority in global c-suites; we reinforced our gender transition and identity guidelines to support transitioning employees and we have actively supported the revision of the UK’s gender recognition laws to make things easier and fairer for our trans fellow citizens; and we relaunched our Safe Spaces campaign across the firm, which helps create an environment that is safe, supportive and inclusive for everyone, including LGBT+ people.

AU: Hypothetically, how can a firm retain its inclusiveness when doing business in a jurisdiction that does not respect gay rights?

KF: It’s important for us that we hold on to our values and strive to ensure that, at least within our offices, our people feel able to be themselves. Employee safety will always be our priority and we are respectful of local law and culture in the jurisdictions in which we operate. Sometimes, however, I think the fear of getting it wrong, makes employers reluctant to do anything at all. We need to be a little bolder, to (respectfully) ask questions, have the conversations with local D&I champions, find out what can be achieved around inclusion, and where appropriate, help to promote progress. It has helped us to work with partner organisations like Stonewall who produce really informative country guides for employers, and also to collaborate and share best practice with other global employers.

DR: Since our combination in 2018, BCLP has signed the UN’s Global LGBTI Standards of Conduct for Business and formed a Global LGBTQ* Allies network, which, since forming has attracted over 500 members across all four corners of the globe – including certain locations where the culture towards LGBTQ* rights is more hostile. Supporting LGBTQ* colleagues – and engaging with our leaders – in such locations is critical and something we take incredibly seriously to the maximum extent possible. We have engaged proactively with human rights organisations and with our contemporaries to understand how we can ensure we are approaching this area responsibly and taking into account insights from local actors and regulations.

HS: A firm can – and we do – maintain safe spaces for LGBT+ staff even in places where gay intimacy is unlawful or where public ‘propagandising’ for LGBT+ rights may be unlawful. A safe space breaks no laws.

AU: Is LGBT+ inclusion overlooked by law firms when it comes to diversity considerations? If so, why is that?

KF: Whilst the legal sector might not always have had the best reputation for diversity and inclusion, I am pleased to say that is slowly changing. As I mentioned earlier, back in 2008, we were the only law firm on the Stonewall Workplace Equality Index. We are now one of many and the legal sector is one of the best performing. There is still work to do but there is far more collaboration across law firms and a real commitment to driving positive change.

DR: From BCLP’s perspective, no. LGBTQ* inclusion is core to the firm’s approach to diversity and has been for many years!

HS: Sometimes we think it is. There are two reasons. First in some places the legal prohibitions on gay intimacy may discourage active support of LGBT+ safe spaces in the workplace: firms go no further in their thinking than ‘it’s illegal’ – even though it isn’t. Second, firms may feel that advocating for LGBT+ rights is in some way a ‘political’ act; it isn’t, there is a world of difference between advocating for people’s human rights and making a political point.

AU: What advice would you give to firms looking to launch their own LGBT+ initiatives?

KF: I think there is a willingness to share ideas and promote progress in this area and so I would suggest speaking to other firms in the sector and asking them for support and ideas. I would also suggest talking to organisations like Stonewall that have so much expertise in helping organisations to develop LGBT+ inclusion strategies. In relation to D&I generally, I think there is often a huge benefit from an external perspective. We have definitely learned a lot from working with the team at our in-house D&I consultancy, Brook Graham.

DR: First, engage with the LGBTQ* community within your organisation. Understand their concerns and ‘what good would look like’. Second, engage with external organisations such as Stonewall, who provide an excellent framework for best practice relating to LGBTQ* workplace inclusion. Finally, remember a primary objective should be that you create an environment where people choose to be open and able to bring their true selves to work. Respect that individuals will be at different stages in that journey and that change can take time.

HS: Do it! For us, we have had nothing but positive feedback on our LGBT+ initiatives from both our people and our clients.

AU: Finally, what would you say to convince LGBT+ lawyers that your firm would be a good home for them?

KF: We are not complacent and realise there is still more to do but we have worked hard over the last 12 years to create an inclusive workplace where everyone can be themselves. However, you don’t have to take my word for it! If you are interested in applying to Pinsent Masons and would like to speak to a member of our LGBT+ network about what it is really like to work for us, please do not hesitate to contact me.

DR: We have worked incredibly hard for over a decade to provide a workplace environment which is genuinely inclusive and where LGBTQ* individuals across all levels can bring their whole selves to work. This is not just about having an active and welcoming LGBTQ* group (although this is something we are incredibly proud of) and engaging with leading LGBTQ* organisations, but it is about providing an inclusive and respectful environment day in day out.

HS: Four simple words: We are not neutral.

See Stonewall’s Top 100 Employers list, in full, here https://www.stonewall.org.uk/our-work/campaigns/top-100-employers-2019.