Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 MARCH 2021

Tax In Brief | Issue 58

Below, please find issue 58 of ENSafrica's tax in brief, a snapshot of the latest tax developments in South Africa.

South AfricaTax

Below, please find issue 58 of ENSafrica's tax in brief, a snapshot of the latest tax developments in South Africa.

CASE LAW

  • Tax Court of South Africa I ABC Bank Limited v Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service SARSTC VAT 1904 [2020] (26 November 2020)
    • The appellant claimed a deduction under section 16(3)(c) of the VAT Act, 1991 (the "VAT Act") for their unsecured lending business in which they would, upon the retrenchment or death of their clients, settle their outstanding loans up to a specified amount.
    • ABC does not charge any fees for the loan cover but does charge an initiation fee, service fees and interest.
    • The South African Revenue Service ("SARS") contends that the loan cover payments do not qualify for an input tax deduction in terms of section 16(3)(c) of the VAT Act because the supply of the loan cover did not constitute a "taxable supply" in that: (1) the loan cover was provided for no "consideration" and accordingly the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from