Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 MARCH 2020

Tax In Brief | Issue 43

application brought to review and set aside the decision of the Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service (" Commissioner" and " SARS") not to remit interest in terms of section 39(7) of...

South AfricaTax

case law

  • The High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Division, Pretoria | Medtronic International v CSARS
    • application brought to review and set aside the decision of the Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service (" Commissioner" and " SARS") not to remit interest in terms of section 39(7) of the Value Added Tax Act, 1991.
    • scope of the record of proceedings in terms of Rule 53(1)(b) of the Uniform Rules of Court ("Uniform Rules"), considered.
    • basis for determining whether information is relevant to the record of proceedings, considered.
    • find a copy of this judgment here.
  • The High Court of South Africa, Eastern Cape Division, Port Elizabeth | Alfdav Construction CC v CSARS
    • application brought in terms of Rule 42 of the Uniform Rules, to amend a judgment to reflect that no penalties or interest would be payable in respect of certain value-added tax assessments, which had been reviewed and set aside.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from