Legal 500
Log in or register
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR
  • Rankings

    • Jurisdictions
    • Submissions
    • Future Lawyers
  • Firms & Lawyers

    • Service Providers
    • Barristers’ Sets
    • Networks
    • Interview with…
  • In-House

    • In-House Content
    • GC Powerlist
  • Knowledge Centre

    • Data Products
    • Legal Business
    • Market Intelligence
    • About us

      • Legal 500
      • FAQs
      • Marketing
      • Careers
      • Trust Centre
      • Contact us
  • Comparative Guides
  • Events
  • Legal 500 TV

About us

  • Legal 500
  • FAQs
  • Marketing
  • Careers
  • Trust Centre
  • Contact us
  • Deutschland DE
  • Paris FR

© 2026 Legalease Ltd. All rights reserved

Registered company in England & Wales No. 02427356 VAT GB 321 5727 22

Registered address: 188 Fleet Street, London, EC4A 2AG

  • Legal 500 Trust Centre
  • Contact Us
  • home
  • Market Intelligence
  • Search

367 results found

Use advanced search filters to refine your search

2 filters applied

Advanced search filters

Topics
Countries
Contributor

Start typing to add contributors

Content type
Show options
  • Article

    企业商业秘密维权司法途径之选择——劳动仲裁 or 诉讼?

    商业秘密(含知识产权)对于世界各国企业和组织的重要性,可谓无论如何强调也不为过。对于大多数企业而言,商业秘密是其生存和发展根
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    DeHeng Law Offices
    DeHeng Law Offices
  • Article

    《商标法》、《反不正当竞争法》2019年最新修改

    2019年4月23日,中华人民共和国国家主席习近平签发第二十九号主席令,公布了对《中华人民共和国商标法》、《中华人民共和国反不正当竞争法z
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    AFD China
    AFD China
  • Article

    AFD China Newsletter - February 2023

    On January 29, 2023, the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA) issued Announcement No. 515, informing that from February 7, 2023 (inclusive), the CNIPA will fully implement electronic patent certificates.
ChinaIntellectual Property
AFD China
AFD China
  • Article

    员工保守商业秘密和国家秘密脱密期相关法律问题分析

    脱密期,是指接触保密信息且负有保密义务的劳动者,在离职或者入职新单位前需要"脱离"秘密的期间。
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    AnJie Broad Law Firm
    AnJie Broad Law Firm
  • Article

    首席知识产权官的核心优势:2026年实现卓越的关键

    七月的一个清晨,伦敦温布尔登的排队人群沿着公园蜿蜒延伸。
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Rouse
    Rouse
  • Article

    2025 Typical Intellectual Property Cases

    Administrative Case on Distinctiveness of a Phrase Mark: Company A vs. China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA), Administrative Dispute over Refusal of Trademark Application...
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    AFD China
    AFD China
  • Article

    China Releases 2025 Typical IP Cases

    China's Supreme People's Court released ten landmark intellectual property cases from 2025, covering trademark distinctiveness, patent infringement in chip technology, trade secret theft, unfair competition through employee poaching and data scraping, and criminal prosecution of counterfeiters. These decisions establish important precedents for balancing innovation incentives with public interests while demonstrating China's commitment to strengthening IP protection in the digital economy.
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    AFD China
    AFD China
  • Article

    自主研发抗辩的举证责任分配与审查认定——最高院案例解读系列⑬

    在侵害技术秘密纠纷案件中,自主研发抗辩是被诉侵权人常常会提出的一种不侵权抗辩主张,关于自主研发抗辩的举证责任分配与审查认定,是正确处理此类案件的关键所在。最高人民法院在(2023)最高法知民终1669号案中,纠正了一审法院作出的被诉侵权人自主研发抗辩成立的错误认定结论,
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    AnJie Broad Law Firm
    AnJie Broad Law Firm
  • Article

    Practical Q&A | Struggling With Trade Secret Protection And Employee Management?

    Featuring three essential Q&As on the definition of trade secrets, common risks, and enforcement strategies.
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Rouse
    Rouse
  • Article

    从小米高管"泄密"被辞事件看企业商业秘密保护与法律责任——企业如何通过有效制度和措施,防止泄密及违反利益冲突行为

    根据澎湃新闻报道,9月8日,小米公司发布内部公告称:中国区市场部员工王腾,泄露公司机密信息,且存在利益冲突等严重违规违纪行为。根&#
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
    Jincheng Tongda & Neal
  • Article

    人工智能(AI)创新的商业秘密保护:三起典型案例的观察

    随着人工智能和大模型技术的快速发展,底层算法、核心训练代码、海量数据集等关键技术要素已成为AI创新企业的核心无形资产。本文通过分析ߍ
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Han Kun Law Offices
    Han Kun Law Offices
  • Article

    最高人民法院知的財産権法廷における最近の裁判要旨のまとめ

    2026年8月末から9月にかけて、中国最高人民法院知的財産権法廷が公表した複数の裁判要旨は、特許の進歩性判断、クレーム解釈、営業秘密保護、&#
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Kangxin
    Kangxin
  • Article

    员工保守商业秘密和国家秘密脱密期相关法律问题分析

    脱密期,是指接触保密信息且负有保密义务的劳动者,在离职或者入职新单位前需要"脱离"秘密的期间。
    ChinaEmployment and HR
    AnJie Broad Law Firm
    AnJie Broad Law Firm
  • Article

    从最高院典型案例看违反竞业限制义务行为的举证责任分配

    上述规定并未将劳动者的亲属纳入竞业限制人员的范围,对于应当承担竞业限制义务的劳动者,也未限制其亲属到与劳动者原雇主生产、经营
    ChinaEmployment and HR
    AnJie Broad Law Firm
    AnJie Broad Law Firm
  • Article

    数据载体型知识产权的司法杯葛兼论电子数据鉴定质证法(下篇):野战实训

    数据载体型知识产权是指以数据作为信息载体以体现出来的知识产权。常见的包括两类:一是用数据记载的知识产权,二是以数据本身作为知识产权。由于数据载体型知产不稳定,其面临着更为严重的证据排除问题。根据案件类型化实证分析,数据载体型知产的证据排除主要原因是证明力缺
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    AnJie Broad Law Firm
    AnJie Broad Law Firm
  • Article

    Newsletter From AFD China For February 2025

    The average review time for invention patents in China has been reduced to 15.5 months, according to the China National Intellectual Property Administration (CNIPA).
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    AFD China
    AFD China
  • Article

    China Manufacturing Contracts: When One Agreement Is Not Enough

    A U.S. company recently called one of our international dispute resolution lawyers after receiving a message from its Chinese factory.
    ChinaCorporate/Commercial Law
    Harris Sliwoski
    Harris Sliwoski
  • Article

    Punitive Damages In Intellectual Property Civil Cases

    China's Supreme People's Court has issued a comprehensive 2026 Interpretation that fundamentally reshapes the punitive damages landscape for intellectual property disputes. The new framework introduces stricter procedural requirements, clearer standards for proving intentional infringement, and detailed methodologies for calculating damages multipliers. How will these refined rules impact litigation strategy and enforcement outcomes for rights holders operating in China's evolving IP regime?
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
    Spruson & Ferguson Lawyers
  • Article

    新规章下地理标志保护的变与不变

    2024年1月2日国家知识产权局发布《地理标志产品保护办法》...
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office
    CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office
  • Article

    China Is Strengthening Its IPR Protection

    The legislatures in China have been amending laws and among other things, introduced punitive damages for IP infringement acts.
    ChinaIntellectual Property
    CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office
    CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office
  • Showing 321–340 of 367 results

    PreviousNext
    Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics