Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 JANUARY 2025

SMS As A Valid Means Of Serving Arbitration Notices Upheld By Singapore High Court

Jincheng Tongda & Neal
Jincheng Tongda & Neal
Contributor
Jincheng Tongda & Neal

Jincheng Tongda & Neal

JINCHENG TONGDA & NEAL (JT&N) was founded in Beijing in 1992. JT&N has distinguished itself as a...

View firm profile
Explore more from Jincheng Tongda & Neal

In the case of Wang Bin v Zhong Sihui, Zhong Sihui (the "defendant") sought to set aside an enforcement order related to an arbitral award issued by the Shenzhen International Arbitration Court ("SCIA") on the basis of ineffective notice having been received in the arbitration proceedings.

ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Abstract

In the case of Wang Bin v Zhong Sihui, Zhong Sihui (the "defendant") sought to set aside an enforcement order related to an arbitral award issued by the Shenzhen International Arbitration Court ("SCIA") on the basis of ineffective notice having been received in the arbitration proceedings. Specifically, the defendant complained that the notice she had received had been sent via SMS to a number registered under her husband's name. Rejecting this argument, the court found that the defendant had actual notice of the arbitration, citing inconsistencies in her testimony and supporting evidence.

The court upheld the use of SMS as a valid method for serving arbitration notices under the SCIA rules, recognizing the evolving nature of electronic communications in legal processes. This development represents significant progress in adopting pragmatic and practical solutions for effective dispute resolution in international arbitration.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from