Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 DECEMBER 2017

Jurisdictional Challenge Against Arbitration Agreement Under Chinese Law (III) —— Problems Arising From Principal And Accessory Contracts

AllBright Law Offices
AllBright Law Offices
Contributor
AllBright Law Offices

AllBright Law Offices

AllBright Law Offices was founded in 1999 as a full-service law firm committed to providing highest...

View firm profile
Explore more from AllBright Law Offices

Jurisdictional Challenge Against Arbitration Agreement Under Chinese Law (III) —— Problems Arising From Principal And Accessory Contracts

ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Compared to other commercial dispute resolution mechanisms (e.g. litigation and mediation), arbitration has a lot of advantages, such as the award is final and binding, the procedure and the hearing are confidential, the award is much easier to be recognized and enforced abroad, etc. However, in practice, quite a lot arbitration awards are held by local courts as non-enforceable due to lack of jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal. Therefore, in order to minimize the possibility of such jurisdictional challenge, parties who refer their disputes to arbitration shall pay attention to the wording and the applicable scope of the arbitration agreement. In some complex transactions, the foregoing question does not only relate to the drafting of a specific arbitration clause under a contract, it requires consistency among a series of contracts.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from