Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 JULY 2016

New China Antitrust Guidance On Restrictive Business Agreements

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

Many horizontal collaborations among competitors, and most vertical supply or distribution arrangements, have both procompetitive and anticompetitive effects.

ChinaAntitrust/Competition Law

Many horizontal collaborations among competitors, and most vertical supply or distribution arrangements, have both procompetitive and anticompetitive effects. Exceptions, of course, are price fixing and other "hardcore" or "per se" illegal antitrust violations, which are considered inherently anticompetitive. Until recently, the Chinese Anti-Monopoly Law ("AML") provided little guidance for companies operating in China about how to evaluate and balance those procompetitive and anticompetitive effects so as to assess an agreement's compliance with antitrust law. Recent guidance will help in counseling companies doing business in China.

In effect since 2008, the AML prohibits certain horizontal and vertical agreements that may restrict competition, so-called "monopoly agreements." At the same time, monopoly agreements may be exempted from the AML when three conditions are met:

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from