Barry Isaacs KC > South Square > London, England > Lawyer Profile

South Square
3-4 SOUTH SQUARE, GRAY'S INN
LONDON
WC1R 5HP
England

Position

Barry specialises in insolvency and restructuring, banking and finance, commercial litigation and arbitration, and company law. He is an Associate of the Society of Actuaries and has particular expertise in cases of financial complexity. He often appears as an advocate or expert in overseas jurisdictions.

Barry has appeared in numerous substantial and high-profile cases in the Supreme Court/House of Lords (eg Lehman Brothers (Waterfall), Nortel (Expenses), Rubin/New Cap Reinsurance, Sigma Finance, Mainstream Properties, Three Rivers v Bank of England), in the Court of Appeal (eg Prudential/Rothesay (Pt VII transfer), Rosesilver v Paton, Woolworths, Davenham Trust, FKI v Stribog, Golden Key, Whistlejacket Capital, OT Computers), and at first instance, including several major trials and arbitrations.

Other recent cases of note include Provident Financial, Greensill Capital, Premier Oil, Castle Trust, VB Football Assets v Blackpool Football Club, HSBC (ring-fencing scheme), Noble Group, Carillion, International Bank of Azerbaijan, Ve Interactive, Orion Insurance, Stemcor, APCOA Parking, MF Global, Punch Taverns, Travelodge, BTA Bank v Ablyazov, and AWAL Bank.

Recent cases in overseas jurisdictions include (in the Cayman Islands) ikang, Qunar, AbraajNord Anglia, Medimpact, Platinum Partners, China Branding, Weavering, Eurasia Drilling, Homeinns Hotel Group, Pacific Harbor Asia Fund, CHC Group, Primeo Fund, FFC Fund, China Fishery, Sterling Macro Fund, Caledonian Bank; (in Bermuda) Georges Bay, Lehman Re, Saab FinancialMillennium Asset Management, KIC; (in the British Virgin Islands) Kaupthing, Monarch Pointe Fund, Thema Fund; (in the Bahamas) British American Insurance; (in Hong Kong) Noble Group, Mongolian Mining; (in the DIFC) Abraaj; and (as an expert in proceedings in New York) Lehman Brothers, Hellas Telecommunications , Mill Financial v Hicks, and Deutsche Bank v Serengeti.

Career

Called 1994, QC 2011. Called ad hoc to the Bars of the Cayman Islands, Bermuda and the British Virgin Islands.

Memberships

Chancery Bar Association, Commercial Bar Association, Insolvency Lawyers’ Association, Recovery and Insolvency Specialists Association, Associate of the Society of Actuaries.

Education

Oriel College, Oxford University (1987 BA); Harvard University (1989 MA).

Leisure

Tennis enthusiast.

Lawyer Rankings

London Bar > Insolvency

(Leading Silks)Ranked: Tier 4

Barry Isaacs KCSouth Square ‘Incredibly bright and thorough, and able to focus in on the key issues. Barry really rolls his sleeves up and cares about delivering excellence.’

London Bar > Banking and finance (including consumer credit)

(Leading Silks)Ranked: Tier 3

Barry Isaacs KCSouth Square ‘Razor sharp cross examiner. He is like a human calculator when it comes to numbers.’

London Bar > Company

(Leading Silks)Ranked: Tier 2

Barry Isaacs KCSouth Square ‘Razor sharp cross examiner. He is like a human calculator when it comes to numbers.’

Strong across the bench in all things company and insolvency related‘, South Square has a foundation in insolvency related instructions but also real strength in shareholder litigation, as well as the recently popular area of schemes of arrangement. One of the highlights in that area was a scheme to compromise mis-selling claims against Provident Financial plc, one of the largest ever schemes of arrangement, with more than 428,000 creditors voting at the scheme meeting. Barry Isaacs KC led Adam Goodison and Ryan Perkins advising Provident, with Tom Smith KC acting for the FCA on the opposite side. Members of chambers have also been involved in some of the market-leading shareholder disputes, including Ma v Wong, where David Alexander KC led Perkins for the latter party.

The English Bar Offshore > The English Bar Offshore

(Leading Silks)Ranked: Tier 1

Barry Isaacs KCSouth SquareBarry’s prodigious work ethic and attention to detail is second to none.  He is tenacious in arguing his client’s case in court but does so in a manner that is persuasive and doesn’t offend the judge.’