Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 FEBRUARY 2025

Paul McCartney vs AI: The Copyright Battle That Could Change Music Forever

Naik Naik & Company
Naik Naik & Company
Contributor
Naik Naik & Company

Naik Naik & Company

The firm Naik Naik & Co is a full-service law firm Headquartered in Mumbai with affiliate offices...

View firm profile
Explore more from Naik Naik & Company

Music has consistently served humans across all ages as a medium of emotional and artistic expression. Paul McCartney, a member of The Beatles, has voiced serious concerns about AI...

IndiaTechnology
Seema Meena
Seema Meena
Manasvi Shah
Manasvi Shah
Apurva Ranjan
Apurva Ranjan

Music has consistently served humans across all ages as a medium of emotional and artistic expression. Paul McCartney, a member of The Beatles, has voiced serious concerns about AI music production and copyright issues in the current era of AI development. The emergence of AI-generated music scores raises significant legal ambiguities regarding ownership rights, as well as conflicts related to fair use and ethical considerations surrounding the defense of artists' rights. McCartney emphasizes that AI technology poses risks for creators, leading to the potential unauthorized appropriation of works without adequate compensation, undermining authentic methods of musical creation. The article explores AI's detrimental effects on the music industry while critiquing the inadequacies of current copyright laws and proposing reforms to balance technological advancement with the protection of musician's creative rights.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Use Of Artificial Intelligence (AI) In Courts

On June 3, 2026, the Supreme Court of India’s AI Committee released preliminary draft of the Regulations for Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Courts, 2026 (“The Draft”). This marks a shift from scattered experiments with AI tools for translation, transcription, research and case management. With over 93,000 pending matters as of March 2026, the guidelines aim to ease processes for officials and citizens. AI could help reduce backlogs through automated cause-list preparation, transcription, research, and defect scrutiny, but its use also raises serious concerns.
IndiaTechnology
S.S. Rana & Co.
S.S. Rana & Co.
Article

CERT-In’s New AI-Vulnerability Guidelines: A Quick-Reference For OEMs, Tech Vendors And In-House Counsel

Cybersecurity regulation in India has, until now, largely spoken to the entity that suffers the breach. The 2022 CERT-In Directions issued under Section 70B of the Information Technology Act, 2000 fixed a six-hour reporting clock on the organisation that detects an incident. The new Guidelines flip the lens onto the entity upstream of that breach, the OEM or technology provider that built the product in the first place. For the first time, vendors supplying software, firmware, cloud platforms, or APIs into India carry direct, time-bound, and independently verifiable obligations of their own and not obligations that are merely passed through a customer contract, but obligations CERT-In itself may enforce.
IndiaTechnology
S.S. Rana & Co.
S.S. Rana & Co.