Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 MARCH 2016

Doctrine Of Non-Interference Not Necessary For Public Interest In Competition Between Internet Product/Service Providers

CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office
CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office
Contributor
CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office

CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office

CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office is the oldest and one of the largest full-service...

View firm profile
Explore more from CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office

Baidu Inc. provides the biggest search engine in China and has been the winner in its fights with many competitors in China, such as Google and Yahoo.

ChinaAntitrust/Competition Law

- Baidu v. Qihoo (Beijing High Court, 2013)

Unfair competition cases have been greatly increasing during the last five years, which in many times were between internet giants marketing in China, such as Tencent, Baidu and Qihoo. In a  significant case between Beijing Baidu Netcom Science and Technology Co., Ltd., Baidu Online Network Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. (both under the control of Baidu Inc. and collectively referred to as "Baidu"), and Qihoo Technology Co., Ltd. and Qizhi Software (Beijing) Co., Ltd. (both under the control of Qihoo 360 Technology Co., Ltd. and collectively referred to as Qihoo), made by Beijing High Court for the second instance, the court established, for the first time, a new doctrine against unfair competition, i.e. the doctrine of non-interference not necessary for public interest.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from