Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 FEBRUARY 2025

When Is Recording At Work Grounds For Dismissal? A Case Of Nuance And Context

Bennett Jones LLP
Bennett Jones LLP
Contributor
Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones LLP

Bennett Jones is one of Canada’s premier business law firms. With deep experience in complex...

View firm profile
Explore more from Bennett Jones LLP

In an age where technology makes recording conversations easy and common, a recent wrongful dismissal case (Wan v H&R Block Canada Inc., 2024 ABKB 734) raises...

CanadaEmployment and HR

In an age where technology makes recording conversations easy and common, a recent wrongful dismissal case (Wan v H&R Block Canada Inc., 2024 ABKB 734) raises important questions about privacy, workplace ethics and the boundaries of "for cause" termination. The matter offers insight into the complexity surrounding after-acquired cause—that is, justifying a dismissal based on evidence discovered after the termination decision.

Background of the Case

The plaintiff was terminated by the employer for cause due to the alleged dissemination of confidential information at a conference. During the litigation, the employer asserted after-acquired cause based on the plaintiff's previously undisclosed practice of recording workplace meetings without the knowledge or consent of others.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from