Psychometric Tests: A Guide

Psychometric Tests: A Guide

Aside from application forms, cover letters and interviews, an additional part of the training contract application process involves psychometric tests. 

Many law firms now use these tests as a shortlisting tool, whether at the opening stages of recruitment or further on at an assessment centre. Wherever they’re set, it’s important that you know what each test entails, so we’ve detailed below the five main types of psychometric tests used by law firms and also included a table which lists the tests various firms use.

Critical Thinking Tests
The Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal is the most common critical reasoning test and is designed to test an individual’s critical thinking ability. It is used by recruiters – especially those in the legal industry – as a way of assessing whether an applicant has sufficient capabilities in recognising assumptions, evaluating arguments and drawing conclusions, all of which we’re sure you’ll agree are important when practising law. The 30-minute, 40-question test is divided into five sections which assess your skills in inference, interpretation, deduction, recognition of assumptions and evaluation of arguments. What does all this mean in practice? Let’s break it down…

Inference
The inference section of the test is all about assessing your ability to draw conclusions from observed or presented facts. You will be presented with information which you should consider as true and below will be a statement that is inferred from the text. Your job will be to decide whether the inferred statement is true, probably true, neither true nor false (meaning there is insufficient data), false, or probably false. Easy peasy, right?

Interpretation
This section measures your ability to carefully evaluate information. You’ll be given a short passage to read and then a suggested interpretation. You’ll have to judge whether the interpretation (or conclusion) follows or does not follow beyond reasonable doubt.

Deduction
The section on deduction tests your ability to judge whether conclusions are justified. You’ll be presented with a short passage following which will be conclusive statements that have been deduced from the text. Your task is to decide whether the conclusion follows or does not follow based on the information from the original passage.

Recognition of assumptions
In the assumptions section of the test you’ll be asked to determine whether an assumption has been made in a given statement. You will be presented with an opening statement followed by a list of assumptions based on the opening statement. You’ll then need to state whether the assumptive statements are indeed assumptive or not, has an assumption been made or not? An example question from Pearson’s Watson – Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal test is below.

Pearsonvue watson glaser example

Evaluation of arguments
Your main task in this section is to evaluate the strength of an argument. After reading a statement and corresponding arguments, you’ll have to decide whether the argument(s) is strong or weak. Strong arguments are both relevant and important to the topic being discussed.

Situational Judgement Tests
Situational judgement tests are used to assess an applicant’s values and how well they align with those of the firm. The test comprises of a set of hypothetical workplace scenarios and asks the applicant how they’d respond to the given situation, either from a selection of answers or using a likert scale. The test gives recruiters an indication of an applicant’s behavioural and cognitive abilities and hints at their communication, teamwork and problem-solving skills. Because firms tailor their tests to their organisation, no two assessments will be the same. There’s no set way to pass a situational judgement test but our advice would be to answer truthfully whilst also keeping in mind the firm’s values and character – how would they expect their trainees to behave in a workplace setting?

Verbal Reasoning Tests
Remember the reading comprehension tests you used to do at school? Well, verbal reasoning tests are very similar. They’re used by employers to suss out an individual’s communication capabilities – how well can they comprehend complex passages and deduce information? Effective communication is important in any workplace, perhaps even more so in law, which is why many firms ask job applicants to complete the verbal reasoning test. The test typically has between 20 and 30 questions which have to be answered within 30 minutes, and will measure an individual’s ability to identify logic through analysis, interpretation and evaluation. How will it work? You’ll be presented with a passage to read and then have to decide whether a subsequent statement is:
a) True, meaning that the statement can be definitively assumed from the information given to you.
b) False, the statement does not logically follow the text that has been given.
c) Cannot say, there is no enough information given to you for you to be able to conclude that it is true or false.

With verbal reasoning tests it’s important to answer the questions based on the information presented to you, after all, the tests are assessing your ability to comprehend, analyse and deduce information, NOT how much you know about the topic being discussed.

Numerical Reasoning Tests
If you’re already fretting at the thought of having to sit a numerical test, you needn’t do so – trust us! The test isn’t full of quadratic equations and probability questions, but rather, presents numerical data for you to interpret and evaluate. You’ll be given graphs, tables and financial reports to analyse, percentage and ratio problems to solve, and perhaps even a question on currency conversion. Recruiters are looking to see how well you can interpret numerical data and draw conclusions from it, as well as if you’re able to identify critical issues from the information. Bonus – you’ll be able to use a calculator when completing the test so you don’t have to worry if your long division skills aren’t up to scratch!

Inductive Reasoning Tests
Inductive reasoning tests are designed to measure an individual’s ability to identify and interpret patterns. They’re similar to abstract reasoning tests in that they both present candidates with a word, number or image sequence to be analysed. Test-takers are asked to consider what is the rule of the sequence and how should the sequence evolve? Your overall test score will reveal how well you can apply logical reasoning and find solutions when presented with new and unfamiliar data. Recruiters use the test as an indicator of an individual’s problem-solving ability, analytic skills and mental flexibility.

Firms and which tests they use as part of their training contract application process*
*Only firms that have specified which test(s) they use are listed in this table. There are additional firms that use psychometric tests as part of their application process but as their website does not specify which, they have not been included in the table.

FIRM  NAME TEST(S) USED
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld             Critical thinking
Baker McKenzie Situational judgement and verbal reasoning
Bates Wells Braithwaite Verbal reasoning
Bevan Brittan Verbal reasoning
Bircham Dyson Bell Situational judgement
Bird & Bird Critical thinking (Watson Glaser)
BLM Critical thinking
Charles Russell Speechlys Situational judgement
Clifford Chance Critical thinking (Watson Glaser)
CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang Critical thinking
Dentons Critical thinking (Watson Glaser)
Fieldfisher Inductive reasoning and verbal reasoning
Fladgate Critical thinking (Watson Glaser)
Hill Dickinson Critical reasoning
Hogan Lovells  Critical thinking (Watson Glaser)
HFW Critical thinking and reasoning (at assessment centre)
Ince & Co Critical thinking (Watson Glaser)
K&L Gates Critical reasoning (at assessment centre)
Kennedys Critical thinking
Mayer Brown Verbal reasoning and situational judgement
Michelmores Verbal reasoning (at assessment centre)
Mills & Reeve Critical thinking
Mishcon de Reya Situational strengths and critical reasoning
Osbourne Clarke Verbal reasoning
Penningtons Manches Critical thinking (at interview stage)
Reed Smith Situational strengths
Royds Withy King Critical reasoning (at assessment centre)
Simmons & Simmons Judgement, logical and verbal reasoning
Stephenson Harwood Critical reasoning
Taylor Wessing Online game based assessment called cosmic cadet. This is a game-based psychometric test, which looks at your behaviour and approach to each task to highlight certain personality traits, such as your ability to innovate. After completion of the assessment you receive a personalised feedback report that details your strengths.
TLT Critical thinking (Watson Glaser) and verbal reasoning

Deal watch: Weil and Slaughters lead on Bain’s £1.2bn esure bid as CC and RPC land House of Fraser roles

Deal watch: Weil and Slaughters lead on Bain’s £1.2bn esure bid as CC and RPC land House of Fraser roles

Weil Gotshal & Manges and Slaughter and May have scooped key mandates on Bain Capital’s proposed £1.2bn takeover of UK insurer esure as RPC and Clifford Chance (CC) wade into the House of Fraser saga.

Weil is advising Bain on the proposed take-private, which will see the private equity player acquire, via its Blue (BC) Bidco Limited subsidiary, all shares in the motor and home insurer for 280 pence per share. The Weil team is led by private equity partner Marco Compagnoni and senior consultant Ian Hamilton.

The mandate is significant for a firm which has historically acted for Bain in conjunction with Advent International on multiple payment processor transactions. These include the $745m acquisition of Concardis and its subsequent merger with NETS in 2017, a $1bn deal to acquire the payments units of Intesa Sanpaolo Banking Group in 2016, as well as the acquisition and subsequent London listing of Worldpay in 2015.

Compagnoni commented: ‘We have worked with the Bain team for a number of years on a range of opportunities, so it is also pleasing that this is our first announced solo deal for them.’

Slaughters, meanwhile, acted for esure in a continuation of its longstanding relationship with the company. The firm’s corporate team was led by partners John Papanichola and Robert Innes.

Papanichola told Legal Business: ‘The team is pleased to have advised esure on its London listing in 2013, its demerger from GoCompare in 2016 and now on this proposed take-private in a relationship that has spanned several years.’

A Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom team led by London corporate partner Scott Hopkins advised the joint financial advisers to Bain Capital: Goldman Sachs; Cenkos Securities and Dean Street Advisers.

The cash consideration will be funded from equity financing drawn down from Bain Capital funds as well as minority equity invested from a number of HarbourVest, Lexington Partners and LGT funds.

Elsewhere, the administration of UK department store chain House of Fraser last Friday (10 August) and its subsequent £90m disposal to Mike Ashley, the owner of High Street chain Sports Direct, has led to RPC and CC being added to the list of advisers.

RPC is advising Sports Direct and CC is advising EY, which is acting as the administrator of the company. The pre-pack administration came about after Chinese investor C.banner, the owner of iconic London toy shop Hamleys, earlier this month backed out of a deal to inject £70m into House of Fraser and issued a profit warning.

Earlier this year, House of Fraser had been looking at a controversial company voluntary agreement (CVA) with landlords, which would have seen several stores closed and rent reductions agreed with unsecured creditors.

To that end, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer was mandated by House of Fraser, with Kirkland & Ellis acting for the bondholders. The Freshfields team was led by restructuring partner Ken Baird and included partner Adam Gallagher, and dispute resolution partner Craig Montgomery.

Travers Smith, with a team led by restructuring partner Edward Smith, advised KPMG as the supervisor of the CVA.

The CVA took an interesting turn recently as a group of landlords, represented by restructuring firm Begbies Traynor and property agency JLL, filed a legal challenge to the proposed arrangement.

The petition in the Scottish Courts challenged ‘alleged unfair prejudice against certain creditors as well as material irregularities in the implementation of the CVA’, according to a joint statement from Mark Fry of Begbies Traynor and Charlotte Coates of JLL. The challenge was last week settled out of court.

[email protected]

‘The time is right’: Ince & Co senior partner Heuvels steps down amid job losses

‘The time is right’: Ince & Co senior partner Heuvels steps down amid job losses

Ince & Co’s senior partner Jan Heuvels has stepped down just weeks after a wave of cuts in the firm’s London office saw 32 job losses.

Veteran partner Peter Rogan, who was Ince’s senior partner between 2000 and 2008, has been named interim chairman of the firm’s board. Rogan will oversee the permanent appointment of Heuvels’ successor, in addition to the day-to-day running of the firm.

Heuvels, who will continue working at the firm, had served as senior partner since 2015. Just last October, he relocated to Hong Kong to expand Ince’s Asia-based client relationships.

Heuvels said in a statement: ‘The time is right for me to pass on the leadership baton of the firm and I will continue to spearhead our Asia growth plan from Hong Kong. It has been an honour for me to lead Ince & Co since 2015 and I look forward to working closely with our new international senior partner following their appointment.’

Heuvels’ decision to stand down compounds a period of serious upheaval for Ince, with 25 business services staff and seven fee earners being let go in July. After the redundancies, the firm also said it was looking to sublet 22% of its 35,000sq ft floor space in Aldgate Tower.

The firm also recorded a poor set of financial results for 2017/18, with overall revenues dipping 6% from £88.5m to £83.4m. In recent years, Ince has taken various measures to improve its performance, such as restructuring its partnership and creating a bonus remuneration pool which saw the top of equity jump from £430,000 to £550,000.

Under Heuvels’ leadership, the firm opened offices in Marseille and Cologne and made significant investments in technology to promote agile working.

Rogan commented: ‘On behalf of all our people I want to thank Jan for his commitment to leading Ince & Co over the last three years. As international senior partner he has successfully overseen the delivery of a number of strategically important initiatives that have significantly modernised the structure and working practices of our firm.’

[email protected]

‘Cracking place to do business’: Burness Paull leverages international growth in 7% revenue uptick

‘Cracking place to do business’: Burness Paull leverages international growth in 7% revenue uptick

It has been a choppy year for the Scottish economy but local independent Burness Paull has used a 30% increase in international mandates to drive its ninth consecutive year of revenue growth.

The firm’s revenue for the year to 31 July 2018 rose 7% to £57.6m, while profit lifted 8% to £23.8m. Chairman Peter Lawson (pictured), who took on the role at the start of August alongside new managing partner Tamar Tammes after the firm changed its leadership for the first time in a decade, told Legal Business he was pleased given it had been a tougher year for the Scottish economy.

‘We’ve set a three-year growth plan and one year in we’re absolutely on track.’

Lawson pointed to a recovery in oil prices, which resulted in growth for the Aberdeen market, as well as investment in renewable energy and technology. Major deals included advising on Savannah’s $125m fundraising and reverse takeover of Seven Energy, as well as the Alternative Investment Market (AIM) listings of i3 Energy, Springfield Properties and Beeks Financial Cloud.

‘Last year was a pretty flat year for the sector, this year there has been a bounce back. Oil prices are a big factor in the Scottish economy, and Aberdeen is a significant part of our economy.’

But the past year was the first in which emphasis on international business, a strategy implemented about three years ago, has been borne out in the results. International clients saw Scotland as increasingly attractive for inward investment and the firm had people on the ground in the US, China, Norway, Canada, India, Germany and Israel every week. This year also saw Burness appointed to the Lex Mundi network of independent law firms.

‘When we speak to clients they see Scotland as a cracking place to do business,’ said Lawson. ‘No doubt the weak pound has helped inbound investment across the UK as a whole but that – combined with it being a good, stable, economy, even with Brexit there – means clients looking to expand their businesses globally are looking at the UK and thinking it’s a safe place to do business.’

Burness Paull’s performance mirrors growth at fellow Scottish independents Brodies and Shepherd and Wedderburn, which saw revenue increases of 3% and 6% respectively. All three firms have seen revenue rise 49% over the past five years.

Burness Paull is paying a 5% bonus to its employees as a result of the performance. The firm has 317 lawyers and 67 partners, promoting five partners the past financial year and hiring former Pinsent Masons restructuring partner Michael Thomson.

Lawson said the changing geopolitical environment and technology would continue to put pressure on prices and the way law firms operated. But he is confident there would be future growth.

‘We think that there will be strong activity, we’ve seen a real increase in capital markets work in the energy sector and private equity will continue to be active. We’re confident that the Scottish market will continue to get strong inward investment.’

[email protected]

White & Case doubles up in the City in continued disputes drive

White & Case doubles up in the City in continued disputes drive

White & Case is continuing its aggressive City expansion with two disputes hires, the firm’s eighth and ninth laterals this year.

Contentious construction and engineering partner David Robertson is joining White & Case’s arbitration team from Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (BCLP), while Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft litigation partner Steven Baker joins the firm’s commercial litigation practice.

Robertson joined legacy Berwin Leighton Paisner in 2013, and has experience acting on major construction, energy and infrastructure projects, while Baker acts on technology disputes, a sector White & Case has highlighted for growth.

Dipen Sabharwal, regional section head of EMEA disputes, told Legal Business: ‘Disputes in London is a core part of our 2020 strategy, and these two hires ticked all the boxes.’

The firm’s much-touted 2020 strategy is about going ‘toe to toe with the Magic Circle’. London-based executive committee member Oliver Brettle, the firm’s former City office head, commented: ‘As we continue to take the fight to the Magic Circle, the arrival of leading partners such as Steven and David propels us forward.’

The headline hires follow that of Chris Brennan’s arrival at the firm in June, with the experienced litigator arriving from Addleshaw Goddard. The latest arrivals take White & Case’s City lateral recruitment count up to nine this year.

Sabharwal added that more disputes hires would be needed if the firm is to make good on its commitment to surpass the City elite: ‘We’re at the halfway mark of our 2020 strategy and we’re not there yet, but it’s a continuing ambition of ours.’

Meanwhile, last month White & Case announced the opening of a new office in Chicago, as the firm continued its dynamic growth drive globally.

[email protected]

Into the mainstream: another big New Law exit sees EY acquire Riverview Law

Into the mainstream: another big New Law exit sees EY acquire Riverview Law

Mere months after New Law pioneer Lawyers On Demand (LOD) secured private equity backers to position itself as a global player, fellow alternative legal services business darling, Riverview Law, has been acquired by big four accountancy firm EY.

The financial details of the deal, announced today [7 August], were not disclosed, but Riverview’s turnover is believed to have risen to more than £10m since it launched in 2012, meaning the acquisition is expected to carry a hefty price tag.

For EY, the buy is touted as a means by which the accounting firm will look to enhance and scale its EY Law managed services offering. EY global head of alliances for tax, Chris Price, will become chief executive of the rebranded EY Riverview Law once the acquisition has been completed later this month. He will be working closely with the existing Riverview leadership as EY looks to service clients across the globe.

The acquisition also sees global law giant DLA Piper offload its stake in Riverview, with the firm previously owning 21% investment in the parent company, LawVest. That stake reduced to 14% after Riverview demerged with Kim Technologies, its highly-rated AI platform, in September 2017.

Riverview’s long-standing relationship with Kim was established when the New Law provider invested in the company in 2014. DLA has maintained a small minority stake in the technology platform following Riverview’s sale.

After launching in 2012, Riverview’s turnover has risen from about £200,000 to what analysts estimate is more than £10m. Riverview invested millions into Kim before the AI platform became separately funded as a global software business.

Speaking to Legal Business earlier this year, Riverview chief executive Karl Chapman (pictured) commented on law firms’ adoption of legal tech: ‘It is fascinating, there is a complacency driven by the profitability and margins that law firms make. It will take 3 to 4 years for that to really come home to roost and there will be some big winners in that changed environment.’

‘Corporate legal departments are moving at a much faster pace, they are adopting technology much quicker, and law firms will be required to catch up because the customer will require them to catch up,’ he said.

Cornelius Grossman, EY global law leader, commented: ‘Legal managed services is one of the fastest growing segments of the legal market. This acquisition underlines the position of EY as a leading disruptor of legal services; it will provide a springboard for current EY legal managed services offerings and bolster the capabilities that we can help deliver for EY clients.’

DLA’s decision to maintain an investment in Kim contrasts with Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (BCLP), which sold its entire 62% investment in Lawyers On Demand (LOD) to buyout house Bowmark Capital in May.

Chapman added: ‘Put simply, we are excited by the next stage in our journey. We believe that the combination of the Riverview Law operating model, operating platform and people, alongside the EY brand, EY clients, existing legal services offering and global scale is a winning formula for the legal market.’

[email protected]

‘The giant is awakening’: Baker McKenzie adds $230m to revenue as partner profits surge 13%

‘The giant is awakening’: Baker McKenzie adds $230m to revenue as partner profits surge 13%

Baker McKenzie has posted one of its best financial performances in recent history as revenue hit $2.9bn and partner profits reached $1.44m in the year to 30 June 2018.

An upbeat chair Paul Rawlinson claimed his firm was winning more higher value work as revenue rose 10% in constant currency and 8% in dollar terms from last year’s $2.67bn. The result confirmed Bakers as the third highest billing firm in the world, behind Kirkland & Ellis and Latham & Watkins.

Rawlison said the firm was climbing up the value chain in the mandates it acted on, pointing to the 13% growth in profits outpacing the increase in revenue.

‘The giant is awakening,’ he added, referring to Legal Business’ feature on Bakers last year. ‘We are going up the market, there is no question about that.’

He saw the results as an endorsement of its strategy of focusing on the key money centres – London, New York and China – as well as integrating the global giant and pitching to clients around industry sectors.

EMEA had a particularly strong year and accounted for 39% of turnover. Americas were a close second at 35% despite a flat Latin American market due to the ups and downs in the local economies. Asia Pacific brought in the remaining 26% of revenue.

Rawlinson singled out the capital markets practice, which saw a significant increase in IPO activity, the international trade group, which was particularly busy advising on sanctions, as well as the employment and antitrust practices. However, he added: ‘You really have to be firing on all cylinders to make sure there is this steady growth across the firm.’

Bakers has been on an unusually high number of large mandates in recent months, such as Chinese internet giant Tencent’s €2.1bn acquisition of videogame publisher Ubisoft from Vivendi and Turkish freight shipping operator UN Ro-Ro’s €950m sale to DFDS. It also advised German company Knauf on its $6bn proposed takeover of USG Corporation as well as DK Telekommunikation and a Macquarie-managed consortium on the $6.7bn takeover of Danish telecoms business TDC.

The year also saw Bakers make a highly significant step towards its stategic goal of integrating along three profits centres in Europe, America and Asia by 2020 as it agreed a deal to unite the bulk of its EMEA business into a single pool. Although Germany and France stayed out of the grouping, Rawlinson said the ‘overwhelming majority’ of the partnership wanted a more integrated firm and promised there would be updates on that front within the next 12 months.

As well as opening its ninth US office in Los Angeles in March, the firm made considerable additions to its partnership over the year with 53 laterals and 64 promotions.

‘The investment in the key financial centres is starting to pick up with a lot of interesting candidates who are increasingly interested in our platform,’ Rawlinson said.

The double-digit revenue growth is particularly good news for a firm that has consistently failed to gain real momentum after the banking crisis.

The five-year performance now looks rosier, with the firm hiking revenue 20% since 2012-13. Profits per equity partner (PEP) still lags the Global 100 average of $1.76m, but this year’s double-digit rise is a good step ahead towards the unofficial target of $2m.

Rawlison admitted that compared to the other giants in the world’s top three the firm has a profitability challenge but concluded: ‘I am optimistic that we can keep this pace. We are beginning to show we can make strides in profitability.’

[email protected]

Bird & Bird Brand Ambassador Blog- Maisie Briggs

Bird & Bird Brand Ambassador Blog- Maisie Briggs

Campus Brand Ambassadorships are a great form of work experience and provide ample opportunities for networking. Maisie Briggs- a Brand Ambassador for Bird & Bird– shares her experience of working with the firm.

The Application Process
I applied to be Bird & Bird‘s campus ambassador at my university because I’ve always had an interest in the firm and thought it would be a good way to find out more. The process was simple – you are required to fill out a form explaining why you are interested in the role, and detail any previous experience you may have. You are then invited to carry out a short video interview. I was told the questions beforehand which allowed me to think through what I wanted to say. It is very important to plan your answers as it ensures you successfully convey your thoughts within the short time-frame of the interview. This was good practice for the video interviews I took later on in the year; I was less nervous when required to record my answers for vacation scheme applications as I was familiar with the process.

My Brand Ambassador Experience
Firstly, the experience as campus ambassador has been hugely beneficial, and allowed me to engage with law firms from the get-go. Not only has it provided insight into how the recruitment process works, but it’s also made clear to me the steps I would have to take when applying for roles at the firm. As previously mentioned, the video interview stage can be very daunting if you have never done it before, but I was aware of what it would entail so found I was able to prepare in a more informed manner than if I hadn’t had prior experience.

As campus ambassador you need to be familiar with the firm you are representing, understand the work they carry out, and know what their main focuses are. This is fundamental knowledge for vacation scheme applications. It is essential that each application is tailored to the firm, rather than using copied and pasted answers. The campus ambassador position gives you unique insight into the firm, and you can use the knowledge you gain to make your vacation scheme or training contract application stand out. You are well informed about how the firm is different from others, and how the tech focus at Bird & Bird is at the forefront of the work they do. I would argue that this is key to a successful application, so being campus ambassador has been hugely useful.

Representing Bird & Bird on campus has also provided me with valuable work experience whilst still studying at university. I have gained skills which are transferable to a career in law. For example, it was important to evaluate the information about Bird & Bird available on their website and brochures, and prioritise the most important aspects to present to students at our pop-up event. This required thinking logically and working as part of a team to ensure the work we produced was efficient and to a high standard. This has not only given me experience that will prove useful when pursuing a legal career, but also provided me with relevant work for my CV. Showing you have thought about the steps you have taken in the lead up to a vacation scheme or training contract is invaluable to your application.

In summary, being Bird & Bird’s campus ambassador has been an enjoyable and beneficial experience. You gain experience for your CV, learn essential skills that will be useful for the workplace, and learn detailed information about the firm which will aid any future applications. It also allows you to meet many other like-minded people who are going through the same process!

Autumn Retention Rates Round-up

Autumn Retention Rates Round-up

Law firms across the country have been disclosing how many individuals from their September 2016 trainee cohort will be taking up associate-level positions with them.

US heavyweight Kirkland & Ellis has reported a perfect retention score of 100% as all 10 of its qualifying cohort will remain at the firm. Travers Smith likewise reported a retention score of 100% as it plans to keep all 21 of its new qualifiers (NQs). Magic Circle outfit Clifford Chancewho recently upped the number of training contact places it will offer – will keep 36 of its 47 NQs giving them a retention result of 77%. Hogan Lovells will keep 27 of its 28 soon-to-be qualified solicitors, giving them a retention figure of 96%. 26 of the 27 newly-qualified solicitors at Bristol-based Burges Salmon will take up associate level roles at the firm, while 8 out of the 10 qualifiers at Mayer Brown accepted NQ job offers from the firm. Sherman & Sterling and Slaughter and May reported near-identical retention scores, with the former retaining 11 of its 13 qualifiers (85%) and the latter keeping hold of 32 trainees from its 37-person cohort (86%). 21 of the 23 offers of newly-qualified solicitor roles were accepted by trainees at Taylor Wessing, giving the firm a retention score of 91%.

Kaplan wins bid to create controversial SRA ‘super exam’ after rivals pull out early

Kaplan wins bid to create controversial SRA ‘super exam’ after rivals pull out early

While education services company Kaplan has emerged as the winner of the race to develop the Solicitor Regulation Authority’s (SRA) controversial new ‘super-exam’, rival providers BPP University and University of Law (ULaw) claim to have pulled themselves out of the running at an early stage.

Kaplan prevailed in a year-long contest between a number of organisations to develop the Solicitors Qualifying Examination (SQE). They were appointed for a period of eight years beginning from the introduction of the SQE, which could be as early as September 2020.

As Kaplan’s appointment was announced, BPP issued a statement saying it had chosen not to participate in the tender process. Director of business development Tricia Chatterton told Legal Business: ‘We looked at the tender documentation and concluded it wasn’t for us. We are in the business of training, it’s always been in our DNA. Why would we want to be the assessment provider for something likely to be problematic?’

ULaw also withdrew itself from the bidding at an early stage. It said: ‘Following an initial expression of interest, The University of Law decided not to tender for the SQE.’

Pro vice-chancellor Peter Crisp commented: ‘The University of Law looks forward to the opportunity to work with Kaplan, to ensure the SQE delivers future legal education and training to the same high standards expected by the profession and the public. It is our hope that this appointment will now lead to the publication of a clear timetable for the assessment implementation, which will provide students, the profession, and ultimately the public with certainty and confidence in the SQE.’

Other unsuccessful bidders have not been identified, largely due to the use of non-disclosure agreements throughout the process. However, the SRA said it featured ‘high quality bids from credible organisations’ that came from ‘a range of expertise in the field, including experience in setting legal assessments’.

The SQE has received substantial criticism since it was announced. Last year a number of City lawyers expressed concern at the single, centrally-set exam. Travers Smith managing partner David Patient said he had ‘serious reservations about the scope and rigour’ of the proposed assessment.

The City of London Law Society (CLLS) also weighed in, slating the multiple-choice nature of the assessment. Its submission to the consultation read: ‘Lawyers need to be able to do more than identify, or worse, guess a correct answer swiftly.’

[email protected]