The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon

Living Wage
GRIFFIN BUILDING, GRAY'S INN, LONDON, WC1R 5LN, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 0202 7404 3447
DX:
400 LONDON CHANCERY LANE WC1
Email:
Web:
www.matrixlaw.co.uk
Matrix Chambers, Andrew Smith, London, ENGLAND

Lawyer rankings

Andrew Smith

Tel:
Work 020 7404 3447
Email:
Web:
www.matrixlaw.co.uk/member/andrew-smith/
Matrix Chambers (Matrix Chambers)

Position

Andrew is a barrister specialising in employment and discrimination law, sports law and commercial law. He is regularly instructed on high value and complex employment disputes involving allegations of discrimination and whistleblowing, and he appears regularly in the Employment Appeal Tribunal (details of which can be viewed on his Matrix Chambers profile). In addition, Andrew is experienced in High Court litigation, including disputes concerning restrictive covenants, confidential information and fiduciary duties. With regard to his growing sports law practice, Andrew has been instructed by UEFA and FIFPro (in connection with their complaint to the European Commission on the issue of third party ownership in football), as well as acting for football clubs, athletes and managers in relation to a range of contractual and regulatory disputes.

Career

Called 2008; Lincoln’s Inn. Publications: author, discrimination law section of Jordan’s Employment Law; contributor to the upcoming book ‘Football and the Law’ (Bloomsbury Professional, 2017); regular contributor and editorial board member of LawInSport.

Member

Employment Lawyers Association; Employment Law Bar Association; Bar Pro Bono Unit; Sports Resolutions pro bono advocates’ panel.

Education

Tavistock Community College; University of Sheffield (2006 LLB, first class); Manchester Metropolitan University (2008 BVC, outstanding).

Leisure

Family time, sport, guitar.


London Bar

Employment

Within: Leading Juniors

Andrew Smith - Matrix ChambersA great tactician and always calm.

[back to top]

Sport

Within: Leading Juniors

Andrew Smith - Matrix ChambersVery bright and a pleasure to work with.

[back to top]


Back to index

Legal Developments worldwide

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Communiqué on Equity Crowdfunding Is Officially Published

    By way of background, in January 2019, the Capital Markets Board (“ CMB ”) had issued an announcement on its website on the Draft Communiqué on Equity Crowdfunding [1] . The CMB has now officially published the Communiqué on Crowdfunding No. III-35/A (“ Communiqué ”), on October 3, 2019. The Communiqué entered into force as of October 3, 2019.
  • Beneficial Ownership Concept new interpretation from the Russian federal tax service

    The recent interpretative letter issued by the Russian Federal Tax Services (“FTS”) on 08th August 2019, has provided further guidance as to the application of the Beneficial Ownership Concept, further to the letter initially provided on the 12th of April 2018 which adopted a strict approach of the concept. 
  • Cyprus and Netherlands Double Tax Treaty Update

    Cyprus has concluded the negotiations for the avoidance of double taxation with the Netherlands. The double tax treaty was agreed at technocratic level in Hague. It is expected to be signed by the end of 2019 or early in 2020.
  • Vacancy - Senior Corporate Lawyer

    The Senior Corporate Lawyer, who will be reporting to Partners, will be working with both the firm’s legal team as well as the financial services team. The successful candidate will be requested to show initiative, take on certain responsibilities within the firm, work in a multinational environment and will immediately be given the opportunity to further advance their career within the law firm.
  • CJEU RULED ON THE APPLICATION OF THE BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP CONCEPT

    The judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on February 26, 2019, in the “Danish Beneficial Ownership Cases”, can be perceived as a landmark on the interpretation of the Beneficial Ownership concept under the Interest and Royalties Directive (IRD) and the Parent-Subsidiary Directive (PSD).
  • Court of Justice rules on source of income for Derivative Residence applications

    On 2 October 2019, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Bajratari v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Directive 2004/38/EC) Case C-93/18 which concerns Chen applications and the source of funds for self-sufficiency. 
  • End of the ‘centre of life test’ in Surinder Singh cases?

    In the recent case of  ZA (Reg 9. EEA Regs; abuse of rights) Afghanistan   [2019] UKUT 281 (IAC ), the Upper Tribunal found that there is no basis in EU law for the centre of life test, as set out in Regulation 9(3)(a) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (the “Regulations”). It further found that it is not to be applied when Judges assess  Surinder Singh  cases that appear before them.
  • ITALIAN RULES ON JOINT VENTURES IN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AND CONCESSIONS

    Italian rules on jointventures concerning public procurement and concession contracts are set out inlight of the European legal framework provided for in Directive 2014/23/EU and 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council. The European rules aim to ensurethe best use of public money so that EU citizens benefit from strategicinvestments and services at fair prices. In this context, public procurementand concessions represent key instruments that need to be regulated and standardisedin order to ensure free movement of goods, freedom of establishment and freedomto provide services.
  • Terms of employment as a sole representative

    In this article we examine the working arrangements of sole representatives, looking at the terms and conditions of employment that the Home Office will expect a sole representative to have in order to qualify as a representative of an overseas business.  
  • Can Sole Representatives Be Shareholders?

    The Immigration Rules require that an applicant for a  sole representative visa  is not “a  majority shareholder in the overseas business”.