Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 AUGUST 2026

BIA Changes Longstanding Advance Parole Rule: What Immigrants Should Know

Greenberg Traurig
Greenberg Traurig
Contributor
Greenberg Traurig

Greenberg Traurig

Greenberg Traurig, LLP has approximately 3,200 lawyers across 51 locations in the United States,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Greenberg Traurig

On Aug. 13, 2026, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) issued a precedential decision in Matter of Delcarmen-Lara, overruling Matter of Arrabally and Yerrabelly (2012). The BIA held that travel outside the United States pursuant to a grant of advance parole constitutes a “departure” for purposes of the unlawful presence inadmissibility provisions under INA Section 212(a)(9)(B).

United StatesImmigration

On Aug. 13, 2026, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) issued a precedential decision in Matter of Delcarmen-Lara, overruling Matter of Arrabally and Yerrabelly (2012). The BIA held that travel outside the United States pursuant to a grant of advance parole constitutes a “departure” for purposes of the unlawful presence inadmissibility provisions under INA Section 212(a)(9)(B).

For more than a decade, Arrabally allowed individuals who had accrued unlawful presence to travel on advance parole without triggering the three-year or 10-year unlawful presence bars upon return. The BIA has now rejected that interpretation, concluding that the statute does not provide an exception for travel authorized through advance parole.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from