Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 JULY 2026

Why AI Is Still Confidently Wrong

Generative AI systems produce plausible but incorrect outputs at rates far higher than traditional software, creating board-level risks that demand new governance frameworks. While recent developments like self-evaluation and grounding techniques show promise, these errors cannot be engineered out entirely. Business leaders must recognize that AI's tendency toward confident falsehoods requires treating it as fallible intelligence rather than infallible automation.

United KingdomStrategy

After years of watching TV and films, I have absorbed unconscious patterns of often-repeated tropes. Rather than keep them to myself, I share predictions about characters and plot with anyone willing to listen. I am often wrong, sometimes spectacularly right, but always confident.

In other words, I behave just like a large language model (LLM).

Of course, real LLMs exhibit a depth of knowledge, speed of retrieval, fluency of recombination, and an inexhaustible ability to follow up that exceeds any human.

And yet, most of us have experienced a definitive response that is entirely false, a reference to a non-existent paper, or a financial summary that does not add up.

For business leaders embarking on AI automation, this is a critical consideration that hasn’t received enough airtime.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from