Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 OCTOBER 2026

AI Is Not Replacing Lawyers — It Is Replacing Inefficiency

Druces LLP
Druces LLP
Contributor
Druces LLP

Druces LLP

Founded in 1767, Druces LLP is a leading City of London law firm, renowned for advising public and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Druces LLP

For two years, the legal profession has faced predictions that AI will make lawyers obsolete, but this narrative fundamentally misunderstands the relationship between technology and legal judgment.

United KingdomStrategy

For the past two years, the legal profession has become the favourite target of AI’s doomsayers. Every few weeks, another headline confidently predicts that AI tools such as Copilot will make lawyers obsolete. Why pay expensive legal fees, the argument goes, when AI can answer legal questions in seconds?

It’s an appealing narrative. It is also fundamentally wrong.

The legal profession has heard this story before. In the 1990s, when online legal research platforms such as Thomson Reuters and LexisNexis arrived, many predicted the end of traditional legal research. Instead, they transformed it. Lawyers no longer had to spend days searching shelves of law reports and could devote more time to analysing the implications for clients.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from