Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 AUGUST 2024

Speed Is Of The Essence When It Comes To Share Registers

Druces LLP
Druces LLP
Contributor
Druces LLP

Druces LLP

Founded in 1767, Druces LLP is a leading City of London law firm, renowned for advising public and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Druces LLP

The Court of Appeal in Bland v Keegan [2024] EWCA Civ 934 upheld that a company's register of members is conclusive, even if a member was fraudulently removed. Liquidators can rely on this register for validating resolutions unless rectified by a court order.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In this article, written by Hannah Pope, provides an insightful analysis of the recent case  where the Court of Appeal addressed the implications of fraudulent removal from a company's register of members.

The recent case of Bland v Keegan [2024] EWCA Civ 934, saw the Court of Appeal consider the status of an individual who had been fraudulently removed from the register of members of a company.

Despite the removal of the appellant's name from the register of members of the company being as a result of a fraudulently executed stock transfer form, the High Court in this case determined that the register of members was conclusive as to the identity of the members of the Company at any particular point in time and, therefore, a written resolution signed by the transferee, appointing joint liquidators, was valid passed.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from