Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 DECEMBER 2023

Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil – A Landmark Decision For Dispute Resolution

Thomson Snell & Passmore
Thomson Snell & Passmore
Contributor
Thomson Snell & Passmore

Thomson Snell & Passmore

With roots going back to 1570, Thomson Snell & Passmore has been honoured by the Guinness World...

View firm profile
Explore more from Thomson Snell & Passmore

On 29 November 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down its highly anticipated judgment in the case of James Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council [2023] EWCA Civ 1416.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

On 29 November 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down its highly anticipated judgment in the case of James Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council [2023] EWCA Civ 1416. This decision is set to change the way disputes are managed, after it was confirmed that the courts have the authority to stay (or suspend) proceedings and order the parties to engage in Alternative Dispute Resolution ("ADR").

Background to Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil

Mr Churchill made claims that Japanese knotweed had encroached from land that the Council owned (which was adjacent to his property) on to his property, causing damage, a reduction in value and loss of enjoyment. Mr Churchill's solicitor sent a letter before action to the Council in relation to these claims. The Council responded pointing Mr Churchill to their internal complaints procedure, and warned that if Mr Churchill proceeded to issue a claim without making use of the procedure, they would apply to the court for a stay

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from