Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 NOVEMBER 2026

A Warning To Anonymous Online Wrongdoers: MKR v Cloudflare Ltd And Others

HCR Law
HCR Law
Contributor
HCR Law

HCR Law

The law firm with a passion for people. HCR Law is an award-winning, top 50 UK law firm providing...

View firm profile
Explore more from HCR Law

The recent King’s Bench decision in MKR v Cloudflare Ltd and others [2026] illustrates how the court can offer a remedy to those wishing to ‘uncloak’ an anonymous online user, for the purpose of vindicating a victim of untrue, harmful online content.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The recent King’s Bench decision in MKR v Cloudflare Ltd and others [2026] illustrates how the court can offer a remedy to those wishing to ‘uncloak’ an anonymous online user, for the purpose of vindicating a victim of untrue, harmful online content.

The applicant in the case applied for Norwich Pharmacal relief, which allows the applicant to obtain disclosure from a third party who has become involved in some form of wrongdoing, even if that was innocently done, so that the applicant can identify the wrongdoer and pursue them via legal proceedings where they would otherwise have remained anonymous.

In a world of ever-changing technological advancements, including social media and AI, this relief can be particularly strategic when applied in defamation, harassment or intellectual property infringement matters.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from