Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 NOVEMBER 2026

Military Deafness Costs Ruling Rejects MoD Challenge To Privileged Schedules

Hugh James
Hugh James
Contributor
Hugh James

Hugh James

Hugh James is a leading law firm, employing more than 680 staff from its headquarters in Cardiff...

View firm profile
Explore more from Hugh James

A Senior Costs Judge has rejected the Ministry of Defence's attempt to use without prejudice costs schedules as evidence of overcharging in military deafness litigation.

United KingdomLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

A judgement by Senior Court Costs Office Judge Whalan in Henderson and McPherson v Ministry of Defence (‘MoD’) has rejected an attempt by the MoD to use without prejudice costs schedules to pursue allegations of overcharging. In a decision on a preliminary issue, Costs Judge Whalan found that the schedules reflected costs actually incurred and that the defendant’s case fell well short of the “unambiguous impropriety” required to remove their privileged status. The decision has practical significance for costs disputes arising from the continuing military deafness litigation, while leaving the amount of recoverable costs to a detailed assessment.

Background to the military deafness litigation

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from