Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 SEPTEMBER 2024

Challenging The Legality And Force Of Presidential Directives In Uganda

It has become commonplace for the President of the Republic of Uganda to issue directives and orders to ministers, government agencies and officials, with the public generally believing...

UgandaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

It has become commonplace for the President of the Republic of Uganda to issue directives and orders to ministers, government agencies and officials, with the public generally believing that these orders must be strictly followed. Recently, the High Court in Nanding Christine v. Attorney General has held that presidential directives are self-enforcing and carry the force of law.

The decision has sparked controversy and raised uncertainty surrounding the legality, force, and strength of these presidential directives as it contradicts provisions of the law and earlier decisions by superior courts.

Background

The President of Uganda instructed the Ministry of Finance to raise the salaries of lawyers working within the Uganda Police Force, to align with their counterparts working with Attorney General's chambers and the Directorate of Public Prosecutions. However, in 2022, the Ministry of Public Service reduced the salaries, citing overpayment. The affected lawyers

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from