Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 JUNE 2026

Double Jeopardy As A Result Of An Arbitration Award

South African Municipal Workers’ Union obo Malatsi v South African Local Government Bargaining Council and others [2026] 1 BLLR 95 (LAC)

South AfricaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

South African Municipal Workers’ Union obo Malatsi v South African Local Government Bargaining Council and others [2026] 1 BLLR 95 (LAC)

Summary
The Labour Appeal Court has confirmed that, while employers are not categorically barred from instituting disciplinary action more than once arising from the same factual matrix, they may not do so where a binding arbitration award has already imposed a sanction for the misconduct in question. The Court held that the dismissal of an employee who had already been sanctioned by way of unpaid suspension amounted to unfair “double jeopardy”.

Key facts
The employee, an accountant employed by a municipality, was dismissed after attempts were made from his work computer to access the municipality’s bank account without authorisation. At the first arbitration, the arbitrator accepted that password-sharing was customary in the department and that it could not be established that the employee himself had attempted the access. His dismissal

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from