Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 SEPTEMBER 2026

No Easy Escape From Gauteng’s Mandatory Mediation Regime

Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr
Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr
Contributor
Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr

Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr

Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr (CDH) is one of the largest full-service business law firms in South Africa,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr

A recent Gauteng High Court judgment confirms that mandatory court-annexed mediation cannot be avoided simply because parties are hostile toward each other or believe the process will be futile. The court ordered an uncooperative defendant to participate in mediation, establishing that only exceptional circumstances will excuse parties from the process introduced by the Directive and Protocol.

South AfricaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In the judgment of Brondani v Brondani (2021-52977) [2025] ZAGPJHC 1157 Adams J confirmed that only exceptional circumstances will excuse parties from participating in court-annexed mediation governed by the Mandatory Mediation Directives of the Gauteng Division (Directive), read with its Mediation Protocol (Protocol). The judgment serves as a stark warning to litigants in the Gauteng Division: mandatory mediation cannot be avoided simply because parties believe themselves to be too hostile towards each other or that the process will be futile. This ruling reinforces the compulsory nature of the mediation regime to all civil actions instituted in the Gauteng High Court divisions.

1848228a.jpg

At a glance

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from