Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 AUGUST 2024

ChatGPT, A Co-Creator? Rethinking Privacy Rights In The Age Of AI Collaborations

Naik Naik & Company
Naik Naik & Company
Contributor
Naik Naik & Company

Naik Naik & Company

The firm Naik Naik & Co is a full-service law firm Headquartered in Mumbai with affiliate offices...

View firm profile
Explore more from Naik Naik & Company

The advent of advanced AI systems like ChatGPT has revolutionized the way we interact with technology. As AI becomes increasingly integrated into creative and collaborative processes...

IndiaTechnology
Bhumika Sharma
Bhumika Sharma
Saanvi Kumar
Saanvi Kumar

The advent of advanced AI systems like ChatGPT has revolutionized the way we interact with technology. As AI becomes increasingly integrated into creative and collaborative processes, it raises significant legal and ethical questions, particularly regarding privacy rights. This essay identifies the collaborative use of AI, such as ChatGPT, as an emerging area needing legal regulation, explains the necessity of such regulation, and suggests possible regulatory measures.

Emerging Area: AI As A Co-Creator

AI systems, including ChatGPT, may now produce writing, music, art, and other creative outputs. These AI technologies are not passive instruments, but active participants in creative processes. They help in brainstorming, droughting content, and even completing tasks alone. The transition from AI as a tool to AI as a co-creator needs a reconsideration of privacy and intellectual property regulations.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Use Of Artificial Intelligence (AI) In Courts

On June 3, 2026, the Supreme Court of India’s AI Committee released preliminary draft of the Regulations for Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Courts, 2026 (“The Draft”). This marks a shift from scattered experiments with AI tools for translation, transcription, research and case management. With over 93,000 pending matters as of March 2026, the guidelines aim to ease processes for officials and citizens. AI could help reduce backlogs through automated cause-list preparation, transcription, research, and defect scrutiny, but its use also raises serious concerns.
IndiaTechnology
S.S. Rana & Co.
S.S. Rana & Co.
Article

CERT-In’s New AI-Vulnerability Guidelines: A Quick-Reference For OEMs, Tech Vendors And In-House Counsel

Cybersecurity regulation in India has, until now, largely spoken to the entity that suffers the breach. The 2022 CERT-In Directions issued under Section 70B of the Information Technology Act, 2000 fixed a six-hour reporting clock on the organisation that detects an incident. The new Guidelines flip the lens onto the entity upstream of that breach, the OEM or technology provider that built the product in the first place. For the first time, vendors supplying software, firmware, cloud platforms, or APIs into India carry direct, time-bound, and independently verifiable obligations of their own and not obligations that are merely passed through a customer contract, but obligations CERT-In itself may enforce.
IndiaTechnology
S.S. Rana & Co.
S.S. Rana & Co.