Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 JANUARY 2025

IBC- NCLAT Fortnightly Summary (October 1 – October 15, 2024)

Argus Partners
Argus Partners
Contributor
Argus Partners

Argus Partners

Argus Partners is a leading Indian law firm with offices in Mumbai, Delhi, Bengaluru, and Kolkata....

View firm profile
Explore more from Argus Partners

The following is a snapshot of the important orders passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ("NCLAT"), under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ("Code"), during the period between October 1 and October 15, 2024.

IndiaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

The following is a snapshot of the important orders passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ("NCLAT"), under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 ("Code"), during the period between October 1 and October 15, 2024.

A. Pre-admission

1.InVisa Coke Limited v. Mesco Kalinga Steel Limited (Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 247 of 2023), the NCLAT held that a Section 8 demand notice which was addressed to the Key Managerial Personnel (KMP) of the corporate debtor would not be a valid notice merely because the notice was delivered to the registered office of the corporate debtor, if the notice itself was not addressed to the corporate debtor.

2.InRahul H. Mehta v. Gajendra Investment Limited (Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 739 of 2022),the NCLAT held that even where the name of the financial creditor is not specifically stated in the balance sheet, if the disbursement can be proved otherwise, a written financial contract is not a pre-condition or an

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from