Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 MAY 2013

CIETAC Rebranding In Shanghai And Shenzhen

Jones Day
Jones Day
Contributor
Jones Day

Jones Day

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,400 lawyers in 40 offices across five continents....

View firm profile
Explore more from Jones Day

A discussion on the dispute between the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission in Beijing and its Shanghai and South China Sub-Commissions.

ChinaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In our Commentary in August 2012, we reported on the dispute between the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission in Beijing ("CIETAC") and its Shanghai and South China (Shenzhen) Sub-Commissions.

Background

To recap, the dispute came about because CIETAC's amended 2012 Arbitration Rules contain a requirement that all cases submitted to CIETAC should be administered in Beijing, unless the parties have expressly submitted them to a sub-commission in their arbitration agreement. This was a departure from past practice, which saw disputes allocated based on regional connection, party convenience, or cost. In other words, if an arbitration agreement simply refers to CIETAC and states that the hearing should be held in Shanghai, for example, the past practice was that the CIETAC Shanghai Sub-Commission would administer the case. However, the amended 2012 Arbitration Rules now suggest that such an arbitration agreement would require the case to be

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from