Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 MAY 2018

Why The LEGO vs BELA Decision Is Interesting To All Of Us

LEGO Group announced recently a favorable decision issued in September 2017 by the Shantou Intermediate People's Court, a second tier city in China.

ChinaAntitrust/Competition Law

LEGO Group announced recently a favorable decision issued in September 2017 by the Shantou Intermediate People's Court, a second tier city in China. LEGO Group succeeded for the first time in China to win an anti-unfair competition case in relation to the packaging of the LEGO Friends series.

Despite not written in the several comments and congrats-articles I have read, I implied that the legal ground used by the Chinese Court was art. 5.2 Anti-Unfair Competition Law (AUCL 1993 version). And then I decided to write this note to clarify why LEGO vs BELA might be interesting to all of us (and not only to LEGO Group).

Art. 5.2 AUCL 1993 reads as following: "An operator may not adopt the following unfair means to carry to transactions in the market and cause damage to competitors: (1) [...]; (2) using, without authorization, the name, packaging or decoration peculiar to famous goods or using a name, packaging or decoration similar to that of famous goods, so that his

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from