Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 MAY 2014

Review On The Case Qihoo vs. Tencent

The third civil department of Guangdong Provincial High People's Court openly delivered its decision on the lawsuit of Qihoo 360 Technology Co., Ltd v. Tencent Inc.

ChinaAntitrust/Competition Law
Ying Yang
Ying Yang

On 28 March, 2013, the third civil department of Guangdong Provincial High People's Court openly delivered its decision on the lawsuit of Qihoo 360 Technology Co., Ltd ("Qihoo") v. Tencent Inc.("Tencent") for abusing dominant market position, denying all claims of the Plaintiff Qihoo and ordering Qihoo to bear the court fees fully. The case that attracted tremendous attention within the field or even throughout the society has so far achieved a preliminary conclusion.

Facts

Qihoo alleged that Tencent's QQ software is dangerous for customers' security so that it launched 360 Privacy Protector, QQ Bodyguard and 360 Security Guard one after another to block the function of QQ. On 3 November, 2010, Tencent published A Letter to QQ's Users calling for users to make an "either-or" choice between QQ software and 360 software and further claiming that it will refuse to provide QQ software service for 360's users and will deploy technical instruments to block users who

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from