Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 OCTOBER 2022

Observations On The Arbitrability Of Anti-monopoly Disputes

Anti-monopoly disputes are civil cases where an operator's monopolistic conduct leads to another's losses, as described under article 60.1 of the Anti-Monopoly Law (AML).

ChinaAntitrust/Competition Law

Anti-monopoly disputes are civil cases where an operator's monopolistic conduct leads to another's losses, as described under article 60.1 of the Anti-Monopoly Law (AML). As legislators have yet to clarify if anti-monopoly disputes can be resolved in arbitration, courts in practice have arrived at entirely different or even polar opposite conclusions.

Besides generating public debate, these cases serve as cautionary tales on potential risks for enterprises and practitioners alike.

CURRENT LAWS

Under the Arbitration Law, contractual disputes and other disputes over rights and interests in property between citizens, legal persons and other organisations of “equal subject” status may be arbitrated. Articles 3 and 17 of the law set out types of disputes that cannot be arbitrated and circumstances that would invalidate an arbitration agreement, but without mentioning anti-monopoly disputes.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from