Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 APRIL 2012

MOFCOM's "Fusion" Approach To Chinese Merger Control

Sheppard
Sheppard
Contributor
Sheppard

Sheppard

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more...

View firm profile
Explore more from Sheppard

We often hear about how China’s merger review "diverges" from other jurisdictions, most recently in reaction to conditional approvals of the Seagate/Samsung and Western Digital/Hitachi mergers.

ChinaAntitrust/Competition Law

We often hear about how China's merger review "diverges" from other jurisdictions, most recently in reaction to conditional approvals of the Seagate/Samsung and Western Digital/Hitachi mergers. But China's MOFCOM is merely doing its homework. Similar to "fusion" cuisine, MOFCOM practices "fusion" merger control as it blends two aspects: its mandate under the Anti-Monopoly Law ("AML"), and the antitrust theories of other jurisdictions.

Unlike other jurisdictions, which are relatively independent of their respective governments, MOFCOM answers to the State Council. Under the AML, MOFCOM's mission has a political perspective to advance "healthy development of a socialist market" and it has the authority to formulate and implement regulations "suitable for the socialist market economy." Therefore, MOFCOM's mission will vary depending on the State Council's national economic policy: whether to move more to a capitalistic market-driven economy or remain as a socialist

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from