Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 JANUARY 2025

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

Draft Revision Of China's Anti-Unfair Competition Law Released

Sheppard
Sheppard
Contributor
Sheppard

Sheppard

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more...

View firm profile
Explore more from Sheppard

China's Anti-Unfair Competition Law ("AUCL") has been amended twice since its enactment in 1993, first in 2017 and another in 2019. On December 25, 2024...

ChinaAntitrust/Competition Law
Yuanmei Lu
Yuanmei Lu
Zhenye Wang
Zhenye Wang
Author LinkedIn connections

China's Anti-Unfair Competition Law ("AUCL") has been amended twice since its enactment in 1993, first in 2017 and another in 2019. On December 25, 2024, the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress released a Draft Revision to the Anti-Unfair Competition Law (the "Draft Revision") for public comment. The public consultation period will end on January 24, 2025.

Below is a brief analysis of the key revisions proposed in the Draft Revision.

I. Introduction of Platform Operators' Responsibilities

One key amendment to the AUCL in the Draft Revision is that the Draft Revision has imposed on platform operators (i.e., operators who provide internet platform services, such as business premises, transaction matching, and information exchange, to natural persons, legal persons, and other market entities) two primary obligations. Specifically, a platform operator should (i) in its platform service agreements with its customers and its platforms' transaction

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

FDA Balances Peptide Policy With Enforcement Against Unlawful Peptide Sellers

Over the past year, industry has had a front row seat as the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA” or the “Agency”) decides just how much leeway it wants to afford the manufacture, marketing, and sale of peptide products, and just where it wants to draw the line. Despite the recent decision of FDA’s Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee (“PCAC”) to recommend a number of peptides for inclusion on the 503A bulks list process — a move that represents a potentially more permissive stance toward peptide regulation, at least in terms of what can and cannot be compounded under 503A...
United StatesFood, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
Sheppard
Sheppard
Article

The Ninth Circuit Affirms Dismissal Of DMCA CMI Removal Claim Against AI Code Generator – Output Is A New Work Not A Copy Of Training Data

There was a significant ruling in the Doe v. Github case involving training of AI code generator models on open source. The United States Court of Appeals for The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court ruling dismissing part of an action brought under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”) by programmers against GitHub, Inc., and other defendants. The issues centered on whether defendants removed copyright management information (CMI) from content used to train the AI code generator models.
United StatesIntellectual Property
Sheppard
Sheppard
Article

Massachusetts Issues Guidance On Data Center Development Under Executive Order 658

Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey has issued Executive Order 658, establishing comprehensive permitting and regulatory standards for data centers exceeding 25 MW of peak electricity demand. The Order mandates community benefits agreements, clean energy procurement protocols, and coordination across multiple state agencies to ensure responsible development that protects ratepayers, communities, and the environment. This action positions Massachusetts alongside other states implementing stricter oversight o
United StatesEnergy and Natural Resources
Sheppard
Sheppard