Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 APRIL 2013

No ‘essentially unlimited right’ To Search Student Mobile Phone

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

The digital age raises difficult privacy issues.

CanadaPrivacy

The digital age raises difficult privacy issues. The Supreme Court of Canada recently said that the expectation of privacy in text messages precludes the use of a general search warrant to obtain them prospectively from a customer's telco; the cops need to seek authorisation for a wiretap, which is more onerous, necessarily time limited and requires notification of the subject of the wiretap: Telus Communications Co v The Queen, 2013 SCC 16. The Supreme Court has also held that a teacher had a legitimate (if 'diminished') expectation of privacy in the school-owned laptop on which he stored child porn: R v Cole, 2012 SCC 53. On the other hand, a warrantless search of a mobile phone with no password protection was upheld by the Ontario Court of Appeal in R v Fearon, 2013 ONCA 106.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from