Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 JANUARY 2013

More Clarification From The CRTC? But Still Lots Of Questions

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Last week, I attended a meeting hosted by the Information Technology Association of Canada (ITAC) where representatives from the CRTC spoke about the enforcement of Canada’s upcoming anti-spam law.

CanadaPrivacy

Originally published 21 December 2012

Last week, I attended a meeting hosted by the Information Technology Association of Canada (ITAC) where representatives from the CRTC spoke about the enforcement of Canada's upcoming anti-spam law (also known as CASL). In earlier posts which was about  Anti-Spam and Email Marketing, I talked about the guidelines that the CRTC recently released on how to comply with CASL. The meeting focused on those guidelines and had the following take-aways:

  • Generally speaking, the guidelines are meant to indicate best practices and are not prescriptive. There may be other ways to comply, other than the examples given in the Guidelines
  • When a "commercial electronic message" (the technical term for spam in CASL, or CEM for short) is sent by a parent company on behalf of more than one affiliate, the CEM needs to identify (and consent must be given to) each of the affiliates

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from