Richard Burrington > 187 Chambers > London, England > Barrister Profile

Richard Burrington

020 7430 7430 richardburrington@187chambers.com View profile

Position

Richard is an experienced trial advocate, noted for his judgement and tactical
skill, Richard Burrington is regularly the first choice of those who instruct him on
behalf of both the defence and prosecution.
Over the course of two and a half decades he has accumulated a wealth of
experience in conducting cases involving the most serious of criminal allegations
including murder, manslaughter, gang related violence, drug supply, rape and
child abuse, fraud and forgery, together with ancillary hearings under POCA.

Career

Criminal Defence:
R v Carter (Central Criminal Court) – Defence counsel in a murder trial lasting 6
weeks. The central issue concerned complex medical evidence that challenged
the fundamental assertion that there had been a ‘killing’ at all – rather than an
accidental death. The defendant was acquitted.
R v Phillips (& others) (Kingston CC) – Defence counsel in a high value,
sophisticated, multi-defendant conspiracy to rob cash in transit vehicles. A case
of its type displaying unique complexity and lasting 5 months. ‘Flying Squad’
police officers were alleged to have perverted the course of justice in fabricating a
nuanced case against the defendants during the course of an undercover
surveillance operation spanning 4 years. This having been set against a
background of a similar attempt by the police to implicate one of the defendants
20 years earlier.
R v Dudley (& others) (Chelmsford CC) – Defence counsel for one of four
nightclub doormen accused of manslaughter, by allegedly having restrained a
customer through the use of excessive force. In a trial lasting 6 weeks, the focus
fell on a multitude of experts who were called to provide opinion on complex
issues of pathology, neuropathology, toxicology and ‘SIA’ approved restraint
techniques. The defendant was acquitted.
R v Daniels (CA (Crim Div) LTL 18/1/2008) – Counsel for the appellant accused
of drug trafficking. An appeal against conviction was successfully brought on the
basis of the jury having reached inconsistent verdicts. Conviction quashed.

Criminal Prosecution:
R v Holland (& others) (Blackfriars CC) – A ‘contract kidnapping’ case, the
substance of which stemmed from an undercover police operation mounted
against an organised criminal gang. The intricate details of covert visual
surveillance and probe recordings were explored during a trial lasting 8 weeks.
All 5 defendants were convicted.
R v Goldstein (& others) (Basildon CC) – An international conspiracy to
counterfeit credit cards and pass them via the UK for use throughout Europe. A
substantial disclosure exercise involved sensitive issues concerning cross-border
police operations.
R v Andress (& others) (Basildon CC) – A sophisticated conspiracy to defraud
insurance companies through the multiple creation of fraudulent applications and
claims for life assurance. 6 week trial.
R v F (Ipswich CC) – Historic child abuse allegations made against a taxi driver
with responsibility for transporting children with Special Educational Needs. 2
week trial.
R v F (Chelmsford CC) – Serious sexual offences committed by a council worker
posing as an airline pilot having met the victim through an online dating website.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex-48558320

Fraud & Financial Crime:
R v Goldstein (& others) (Basildon CC) – An international conspiracy to
counterfeit credit cards and pass them via the UK for use throughout Europe. A
substantial disclosure exercise involved sensitive issues concerning cross-border
police operations.
R v Andress (& others) (Basildon CC) – A sophisticated conspiracy to defraud
insurance companies through the multiple creation of fraudulent applications and
claims for life assurance. 6 week trial.

Memberships

Criminal Bar Association
South Eastern Circuit
Essex Bar Mess

Education

Awards, Qualifications & Other:
Grade 3 CPS Counsel
CPS Rasso Panel