The Legal 500

Twitter Logo Youtube Circle Icon LinkedIn Icon
22 UPPER WOBURN PLACE, LONDON, WC1H 0HW, ENGLAND
Tel:
Work 0207 9353522
Fax:
Fax 0207 5351335
DX:
40007 EUSTON
Email:
Web:
www.freemanssolicitors.net

London: Crime, fraud and licensing

Crime: general
Crime: general - ranked: tier 3

Freemans Solicitors

Freemans Solicitors' team is 'hard working, dedicated and committed to achieving the best results for its clients'. Recent instructions for the group include cases of murder, sexual assault, violent crime and high-value fraud. Practice co-heads Michael Field and Kishoree Kotecha-Pau are 'extremely experienced, approachable and friendly lawyers'.

Practice head(s):Michael Field; Kishoree Kotecha-Pau

Testimonials

'Kishoree Kotecha-Pau combines an incisive legal brain with a gentle and reassuring manner. She is approachable, diligent, calm and constructive'.

'Michael Field is an excellent advocate who gets the work done very efficiently'.

[back to top]

London: Private client

Family
Family - ranked: tier 2

Freemans Solicitors

Freemans Solicitors is particularly renowned for its work on both complex public and private law children matters. It represents a wide range of clientele including well-known actors, high-net-worth individuals and members of the aristocracy on various matters such as parental alienation, fabricated illness through to sexual abuse cases. It also frequently acts on the behalf of children either through their court-appointed guardian or by a direct instruction from the children themselves. It has vast experience of complicated cross-border matters and the team often features in reported cases regarding applications under the 1980 Hague Abduction Convention or other areas including the 1993 Hague Treaty on adoption. Its matrimonial practice is also strong and specialises in dealing with high-net-worth individuals. Nina Hansen is ‚Äėexceptional‚Äô.

Practice head(s):Nina Hansen

Other key lawyers:Hilka Hollmann; Laura Coyle; Georgina Stavrou

Testimonials

'Freemans has a strong family team with a vast range of expertise. It deals with all areas of family work from high-net-worth financial cases to complex care proceedings. It is a supportive team that works incredibly well together'.

'Freemans is the creme de la creme for public law family work; and for complex private law work.  What sets the team apart is that it is in the High Court day in, day out, so has expert knowledge of practice and procedure there'.

'Freemans occupies a niche position in family law. It has excellent public law solicitors undertaking work at the highest level in the most difficult cases and unusually also services private law clients and international cases at a very high level. This cross-fertilisation of work gives the solicitors in the firm a very valuable breadth of experience'.

'The team has great energy. The relatively young profile of the partners makes them forward looking and innovative in their approach. The lawyers are notable for their work with modern families and with young people in parental disputes'.

'Nina Hansen is so adept at international children work she could probably do it in her sleep'.

'Nina Hansen is an excellent tactician and fights very hard for all of her clients. She is particularly skilled with vulnerable clients'.

'Laura Coyle's robust yet pragmatic approach to children cases makes her one of London's "go to" solicitors to represent children'.

'Laura Coyle fights tooth and nail for her clients. You want her on your side. She is forensic in her approach to all of her cases. She works diligently to get the right result'.

'Laura Coyle gets up to her elbows in cases. She conducts much of her own advocacy where she is robust and effective'.

'Hilka Hollmann is an outstanding lawyer with an exceptional grasp of international adoption issues from a family law perspective. Georgina Stavrou has quite an astonishing grasp of her work for someone of her level'.

Leading individuals

Nina Hansen - Freemans Solicitors

Next Generation Partners

Hilka Hollmann - Freemans Solicitors

Laura Coyle - Freemans Solicitors

[back to top]


Further information on Freemans Solicitors

Please choose from this list to view details of what we say about Freemans Solicitors in other jurisdictions.

London

Offices in London

Legal Developments in the UK

Legal Developments and updates from the leading lawyers in each jurisdiction. To contribute, send an email request to
  • Court of Justice rules on source of income for Derivative Residence applications

    On 2 October 2019, the Court of Justice delivered its judgment in Bajratari v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Directive 2004/38/EC) Case C-93/18 which concerns Chen applications and the source of funds for self-sufficiency. 
  • End of the ‚Äėcentre of life test‚Äô in Surinder Singh cases?

    In the recent case of¬† ZA (Reg 9. EEA Regs; abuse of rights) Afghanistan ¬† [2019] UKUT 281 (IAC ), the Upper Tribunal found that there is no basis in EU law for the centre of life test, as set out in Regulation 9(3)(a) of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (the ‚ÄúRegulations‚ÄĚ). It further found that it is not to be applied when Judges assess ¬†Surinder Singh ¬†cases that appear before them.
  • Terms of employment as a sole representative

    In this article we examine the working arrangements of sole representatives, looking at the terms and conditions of employment that the Home Office will expect a sole representative to have in order to qualify as a representative of an overseas business.  
  • Can Sole Representatives Be Shareholders?

    The Immigration Rules require that an applicant for a¬† sole representative visa ¬†is not ‚Äúa¬† majority shareholder in the overseas business‚ÄĚ.
  • Immigration Skills Charge - A Guide for Employers

    As a Sponsor, you may be required to pay the Immigration Skills Charge (ISC) each time you sponsor a migrant in the  Tier 2 General  or  Intra-Company Transfer (ICT) Long-term Staff  subcategory.
  • 5 FAQS about paragraph 320(11)

    In applications for entry clearance where the applicant has a negative immigration history in the UK, the application may be refused under the general grounds for refusal, which are found in part 9 of the Immigration Rules. Where an applicant has ¬†‚Äėpreviously contrived in a significant way to frustrate the intentions of the Immigration Rules‚Äô,¬† the application could be refused under paragraph 320(11). In this post we look at five frequently asked questions about paragraph 320(11).¬†
  • Multiple nationality and multiple citizenship (including dual nationality and dual citizenship)

    British nationality law permits multiple nationality and multiple citizenship, including dual nationality and dual citizenship.
  • Applying for Indefinite Leave to Remain in the Exceptional Talent or Promise Category

    The  Exceptional Talent  and Exceptional Promise categories are for individuals who are recognised leaders or emerging leaders in their field of expertise. There are a number of endorsing bodies for lots of different fields of work, including  artists and musicians ,  architects ,  digital experts ,  scientists  and  academics . While there isn’t an endorsing body for every expert, the growing list means that many individuals could enjoy the flexibility that this category has to offer. 
  • PARALLEL PROCEEDINGS ‚Äď CIVIL AND CRIMINAL

    Syedur Rahmanconsiders the factors that determine when civil proceedings can go ahead before,or at the same time as, criminal proceedings relating to the same circumstances.
  • Rights of appeal after the Immigration Act 2014

    The Immigration Act 2014 (‚Äúthe 2014 Act‚ÄĚ) reduced the circumstances in which the refusal of an immigration application will give rise to a right of appeal.¬†The¬† explanatory notes ¬†to the 2014 Act state that the Act was intended to restructure rights of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal. Previously, a right of appeal to the Immigration Tribunal existed against any of the 14 different immigration decisions listed in s.82 of the¬† Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 ¬†(‚Äúthe 2002 Act‚ÄĚ). As explained below, whether or not the refusal of an immigration application currently generates a right of appeal depends on the subject matter of the application rather than its categorisation.