Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 AUGUST 2014

Third Circuit Issues Decision Concerning Medicare Secondary Payer Act In New Jersey

The Third Circuit issued an interesting court decision concerning the Medicare Secondary Payer Act that may provide guidance to the parties in tort litigation.

United StatesLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

On July 29, 2014, the Third Circuit issued an interesting court decision concerning the Medicare Secondary Payer Act (MSP) that may provide guidance to the parties in tort litigation, particularly in New Jersey tort litigation, in a case styled Taransky v. United States. The Taransky case involved a slip and fall accident involving a settlement by a tortfeasor who tried to resolve the Medicare lien in the settlement process. The case pitted two statutes against each other, the Medicare Secondary Payer Act and a New Jersey statute prohibiting tort claimants from recovery twice under medical insurance and liability insurance. In the end, the Third Circuit found that the plaintiff had to reimburse Medicare from the tort settlement for medical bills incurred by Medicare. The logic of the case is pretty solid under the Medicare Secondary Payer Act. The beneficiary tried to rely (1) upon a New Jersey statute that said a claimant could not collect twice on collateral sources,

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from