Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 JANUARY 2026

Vietnam- New Law On E Commerce – What You Must Know

Duane Morris LLP
Duane Morris LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Duane Morris LLP

On 10 December 2025, the National Assembly officially passed the Law No. 122/2025/QH15 on E-Commerce ("Law on E-Commerce"), marking a historic shift in Vietnam's digital economy governance.

VietnamStrategy
Oliver Massmann
Oliver Massmann
Author LinkedIn connections

On 10 December 2025, the National Assembly officially passed the Law No. 122/2025/QH15 on E-Commerce ("Law on E-Commerce"), marking a historic shift in Vietnam's digital economy governance. Replacing the fragmented regulations of Decree 52/2013, this new Law on E-Commerce establishes a unified, comprehensive legal framework.

The Law on E-Commerce enters into force on 1 July 2026. Key highlights & impacts:

1. Expanded Scope and Classification
The Law introduces a nuanced classification system for digital platforms, moving beyond simple "sales" vs. "service" definitions.

1. Social Networks & Livestreams: Platforms with commercial functions (social commerce) and livestreaming activities are now explicitly regulated.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

Disclaimer: This Alert has been prepared and published for informational purposes only and is not offered, nor should be construed, as legal advice. For more information, please see the firm's full disclaimer.

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

See more popular content from

Article

Vietnam’s Consumer Revolution: A Strategic Opportunity For German Retail

Vietnam is rapidly transforming from a manufacturing hub into one of Southeast Asia's most promising consumer markets. Rising incomes, urbanization, and a growing middle class are driving demand for high-quality international products, particularly in health, beauty, and family care categories. This shift raises a strategic question: which German retail concepts are best positioned to capitalize on Vietnam's evolving consumer landscape?
VietnamStrategy
Duane Morris LLP
Duane Morris LLP
Article

DHS Proposes $70,000 And $30,000 Fees For F-1 Optional Practical Training

The Department of Homeland Security has proposed a controversial new rule requiring SEVP-certified schools to pay substantial fees—$70,000 for a student's first Optional Practical Training recommendation and $30,000 for each subsequent OPT application, including STEM extensions. With only a 30-day comment period and potential annual costs reaching up to $16.5 billion across nearly 2,500 affected institutions, the proposed regulation is expected to face significant legal challenges if finalized.
United StatesImmigration
Duane Morris LLP
Duane Morris LLP
Article

SEC Proposes Rule Amendments To Expand Retail Access To Private Markets

The SEC has proposed sweeping amendments to expand retail investor access to private market strategies, including changes to performance-based compensation rules for registered investment advisers and modernization of the interval fund framework. The proposals also explore new credential-based pathways for individuals to qualify as accredited investors, potentially opening private offerings to a broader pool of eligible participants.
United StatesFinance and Banking
Duane Morris LLP
Duane Morris LLP
Video

The Class Action Weekly Wire – Episode 168: Maryland Federal Court Dismisses ‘Drip Pricing’ Class Action Against Ticket Reseller (Video)

A federal court in Maryland recently ruled on a consumer protection class action against Vivid Seats involving allegations of "drip pricing" - the practice of advertising ticket prices without mandatory fees that are revealed later in checkout. While the court found the company's arbitration agreement unenforceable due to its unilateral modification clause, it ultimately dismissed the lawsuit for failure to adequately allege reliance or injury under Maryland's Consumer Protection Act.
United StatesConsumer Protection
Duane Morris LLP
Duane Morris LLP